RSS
Google As Benevolent Dictator: The Gatekeeper And The Data Collector
from the are-you-scared-yet? dept
Two separate stories in the NY Times provide fodder for those who view Google as the new scary borg. The first, looks at Google's sometimes slippery slope role as a "gatekeeper" of information within certain countries. For example, it looks at Google's agreement to help block access to certain YouTube videos in Thailand and similar decisions in other countries. The article plays up Google's reluctance to be involved in making these sorts of decisions (and highlights how the company hopes that more countries learn to accept free speech a bit more), but it still leaves you with this questionable feeling of Google as quasi-government censor. No matter how well-meaning the people may be who are making the decisions, it still feels questionable.
The second article isn't just about Google, but talks about how, with various online services, many people are effectively giving up their privacy. This is hardly a new topic, and it's one that's been discussed repeatedly -- often with a nod to the famous Scott McNealy quote from almost a decade ago: "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it." The article touches on a lot more than just Google, but does mention the fact that Google seems to have access to all sorts of data that, when clumped together, could be seen as a violation of privacy for some.
Between the two stories, you can see why there's a growing sense of worry among some about how Google could become dangerous. It has access to all sorts of data about you -- and has the power to make decisions about what you can access, often with no explanation or recourse. Put that together, and you get this picture of Google as the benevolent dictator of the internet -- where it may be using its powers (mostly) for good, but there's plenty of potential that eventually it could turn evil. And, to some extent, it's worth highlighting these issues, so that people don't become complacent about Google's actions. But, there's an undercurrent to these stories that seem to miss out on a few things: if Google really does start abusing either of these "powers," unlike with a dictator, people have pretty easy choices to go elsewhere. Furthermore, as more concerns are raised about any potential abuse, people are rapidly working on technologies that solve both issues -- allowing people to surf the internet much more anonymously, while also routing around censorship. So, while it's not problematic to highlight these potential issues with Google, that doesn't mean that there aren't necessary checks and balances in place.
10 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Iranian Filmmaker Banned From Filmmaking... Makes Documentary Via His iPhone About His Plight
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- If The Internet Is Treated Just Like The Offline World, We'd Never Have Ridiculous Laws Like SOPA/PIPA
- Trustwave Admits It Issued A Certificate To Allow Company To Run Man-In-The-Middle Attacks
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
As long as there are people involved with systems, sooner or later some employee will dig into records to look at things they shouldn't. If Verizon employees can look into Obama's calling patterns (credit Verizon for disclosing that) does anyone really think that they could be safe from such action?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's still pretty tough to get anonymity when you're dealing with money or physical delivery of goods.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Or any website that uses Google Analytics.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What? You haven't gotten your Google tattoo yet? You know it's required before you can condict buisness in the Google Marketplace don't you?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
privacy
When I start typing in the Google search bar, it usually comes up with auto completetions that are crazy awesome. Why the time I type in "Wor", it has already recommended "world of warcraft". When I type "Add" it already says "addons" if i type "addons x" it already says "addons x-perl".
it knows i'm looking for world of warcraft addons and it sometimes even lists a few addons I haven't seen before, but other people have searched for. I'll look into those addons because Goggle is "recommending" them in that other people find these searches useful
I find this VERY useful. this also means they know a lot about me. It's a trade off, privacy vs convenience. You CAN'T have both
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
And some say the same thing about security and safety.
Do consumers really know what they are trading away?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment