Time Warner Cable Accused Of Antitrust Violation For Requiring You To Rent Your Modem
from the illegal-tying? dept
A guy in Kansas is suing Time Warner Cable for its practice of requiring customers to "rent" their cable modem boxes. He claims that this is an illegal "tying" arrangement, since most subscribers would probably prefer to just own their modem boxes outright. Modem Box rentals have always been something of a scam. It's just a way to charge more for the monthly service, without having to include this extra "cost" in the price that they advertise to consumers. The guy is even noting that this requirement of renting a specific cable modem harkens back to when AT&T required you to rent your telephone from them. The courts struck that down, so hopefully they'll strike down this practice as well.
63 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- French Court Fails Digital Economics; Claims Free Google Maps Is Illegal
- How Much Of The Collapse Of Recorded Music Sales Revenue Was Due To The End Of Illegal Price Fixing?
- Ex-FTC Officials Remind Current FTC Officials That They're Supposed To Protect Consumers, Not Competitors
- Time Warner Cable CEO Remains In Denial About Cord Cutting
- Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Sure hope he's successful
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Toss Aways
Whenever I cancel service however, they Never ask for the modem back or the little dongles for the telephones. Seems odd to be charging a monthly rental fee on something they give away in the end anyway.
I started giving their own modem to other customers switching about and they don't even recognize that it's been recycled. Odd, but true.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Forced rental?
Maybe Time Warner Kansas is different than Northeast Ohio.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Comcast too
I am happy and ready to pay for Comcast digital cable but have delayed doing so because I have no place or need for the box they will force me to rent.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Toss Aways
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not to mention...
On a side note; If you want to find out how to get thousands of people to send you $10 every day just send me $10 and I will rush you my new self help pamphlet: "Stupidity and You...A guide to why you are so stupid"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Wrong
The headline of the linked article is "Man Files Antitrust Suit Against Time Warner Over Forced Cable Box Rentals".
"Cable box" != "Cable modem".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Comcast too
Or do what I do, have a TivoHD and get a cablecard from comcast so you can get the digital channels. (the cable card is like 2.50 I think).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not to mention...
i would love to own my own box, but i just switched providers and have yet to read into all the agreements.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Comcast
I've been running the same Surfboard 5100(?) for years now and just gave a spare I had to my girlfriend when she get her internet in her new place.
I'd be all pissed off if they required I used that specific box and had to "rent" it.
That'd be analogous to PSNH (power company) charging me a "rent" for the line that goes to my house from the power network.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Digital's great and all, except it costs more, has more channels I'll never watch, requires another box to draw more power and use another remote with more batteries and will just get lost by the kids anyway, and suddenly my "cable-ready TV" is now just a big monitor permanently tuned to channel 3 (or aux video input) -- and the dual-tuner PIP function on the TV becomes pretty worthless...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not quite the same
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Toss Aways
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Its all about the bottom line, and replacing older analog equipment, making all the nodes and amps on the network digital and addressable saves them tons of money in maintenance costs.
Which they wont pass on to you of course, that goes straight to their profit margins...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not to mention...
Besides that, they don't, and cannot bar you from using your own router. The difference in using yours? Lack of support except by the OEM, who almost always want to point the finger at the ISP.
The same goes for those that want their own modems. Sure you could get one in the store, but its not typically better quality no mater what you think. They are all standardized to work on the DOCSIS protocol. The real difference is you know its not been used before.
But if you rented modem goes out, gets struck by lightning, what have you, the cable company will replace it for free. Its added convenience if you want it, and the ability to have your own if you don't; Just accept the consequences.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
And don't forget...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Forced rental?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Why verify anything.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Toss Aways
I have yet to see a cable service that rents equipment that does NOT require the equipment's return. People, if you have questions about that rental equipment, call your cable provider. >.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Modem rental
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cable BOX
My TV has a cable card slot and Time Warner will let me use it instead of a cable box, but then I won't be able to receive the channel guide or PPV movies.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
All hail Optonline.net
Shame on their cable service for making me pay rent for the dumb box and the remote (yeah $3 for the remote)
Thanks to their internet section for keeping the modems free.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Forced rental?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
training the reps? HAHAHAHAHAHA
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sure hope he's successful
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not to mention...
that's my beef and that's the facts IN KANSAS CITY and i'm sticking to it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not to mention...
Sorry, this is just not true. I have an Ambit cable modem + wireless router (they call it a gateway) from my ISP, and it doesn't even touch my Linksys wireless router in features and configuration - that is, how much control I have over it. You could claim that it's the same hardware inside the box with a different interface on it, but I'll only believe you if you back it up with evidence.
To be fair, you did say "not typically better quality", by which you may have meant strictly reliability and longevity. In that case, maybe it's true. I haven't found either to be substantially more reliable than the other - both work flawlessly almost all the time. And it's too early to tell how long they'll last as they're both pretty new. But other than that, there are major differences, and they're all in favor of the Linksys (except of course that the Linksys isn't a cable modem).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not to mention...
OK, so I read your comment again, and you're talking about cable modems and I was talking about oranges. So, never mind. :-) I hope you can get better cable modems from other providers, but I don't know.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not quite the same
How so? That's exactly what they do to customer owned cable modems. Once you connect it to their system the cable company takes it over and basically has their way with it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Modem rental
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I am a technical writer who spends much of my time in the creation and rewriting of company training manuals to reflect current technology and trends.
I have seen reference and training documents from Time Warner, Roadrunner, and Earthlink for broadband over cable technical support, including the hoops they make call center agents jump through to support those Home networking products.
They spend quite a bit of time and money; first in the creation of the training materials and programs, and then in lost productivity and manpower training these reps instead of having them answer the phone.
The quality of the call center not withstanding, the training regiment is there.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not to mention...
Actually that was exactly what I was talking about :)
I should have been more clear in my post, but I was attempting to say; "Since the modems are all standardized to function on the same protocol, the only market differentiation they could have is the included feature sets of the firmware interface, or external features such as Wireless, Support for VPN tunneling, and the like."
I just didn't explain it very well, and for that the only excuse I can offer is I was only on my second cup of coffee this morning when I wrote that ;)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Please (re)move the cable modem comments
It really dilutes the quality of the comments.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sure hope he's successful
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wrong
I cant belive the stupidity
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Wrong
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wrong
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I understand but.........
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sure hope he's successful
You can just call them up tell them you have your own modem and you need to get it provisioned. Tell them further to come pick up their modem and you want the $5.00 a month fee deducted from your monthly bill.
Make sure you get the agents name and I do and put this in an email to yourself and your done!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Toss Aways
You need to return this equipment otherwise somewhere down the line if you don't have a singed receipt of receiving the modem THEY WILL CHARGE YOU.
They are the biggest scum bags known to man but you have to return these items or you will be shafted in the end....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not quite the same
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cable Box
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cable Box
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
time warner cable monopoly
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Yea Right
How i know why New Yorkers are so stupid, They do not send a signal to blow up your box. BS Get a grip and put on your tin hat.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
AND the poor lady's problem had been 'helped' twice before...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Time Warner Cable Boxes
Linda in Milwaukee Wisconsin
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: time warner cable monopoly
It's possible where you live falls short of another company's service area, but I'm pretty sure dish and directv would still be usable alternatives regardless where you live. I'm not 100% on that, though.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: time warner cable monopoly
If those companies were owned by Time Warner Cable or didn't exist.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
law suit
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
piss poor service and wrongfull billing
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
time warner sucks asshole
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Comcast too
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment