Scams

Scams

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
battles, black hat, marketing, spam

Companies:
craigslist



Inside Craigslist's Increasingly Complicated Battle Against Spammers

from the spam-fight dept

John Nagle writes in with a fascinating dissection of the ongoing battle between Craigslist and spammers. The back and forth nature of this battle is fascinating -- and somewhat disturbing when you realize the lengths to which spammers will go to get spam onto Craigslist, and the extent to which an entire ecosystem of scammers and software providers seems to have been built up around this effort:

"Spam on Craigslist has been a minor nuisance for years. Not any more. This year, the spammers started winning and are taking over Craigslist. Here's how they did it. Craigslist tries to stop spamming by checking for duplicate submissions. They check for excessive posts from a single IP address. They require users to register with a valid E-mail address. They added a CAPTCHA to stop automated posting tools. And users can flag postings they recognize as spam.

Several commercial products are now available to overcome those little obstacles to bulk posting. A tool called CL Auto Posting Tool is one such product. It not only posts to Craigslist automatically, it has built-in strategies to overcome each Craigslist anti-spam mechanism.

Random text is added to each spam message to fool Craigslist's duplicate message detector. IP proxy sites are used to post from a wide range of IP addresses. E-mail addresses for reply are Gmail accounts conveniently created by Jiffy Gmail Creator ("Who Else Wants to Create Unlimited Gmail Accounts in Seconds Flat Without Breaking a Sweat?") An OCR system reads the obscured text in the CAPTCHA. Automatic monitoring detects when a posting has been flagged as spam and reposts it.

CL Auto Poster isn't the only such tool. Other desktop software products are AdBomber and Ad Master. For spammers preferring a service-oriented approach, there's ItsYourPost.

With these power tools, the defenses of Craigslist have been overrun. Some categories on Craigslist have become over 90% spam. The personals sections were the first to go, then the services categories, and more recently, the job postings.

Craigslist is fighting back. Its latest gimmick is phone verification. Posting in some categories now requires a callback phone call, with a password sent to the user either by voice or as an SMS message. Only one account is allowed per phone number. Spammers reacted by using VoIP numbers. Craigslist blocked those. Spammers tried using number-portability services like Grand Central and Tossable Digits. Craigslist blocked those. Spammers tried using their own free ringtone sites to get many users to accept the Craigslist verification call, then type in the password from the voice message. Craigslist hasn't countered that trick yet.

Much of the back and forth battle can be followed in various forums.

It's not clear yet who will win. Craigslist may find something that works. If it doesn't, however, it could be toast for the success story of Craigslist."

182 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. May 23rd, 2008 @ 5:42pm
    by Jake

    Hell's bells... I got nuthin'.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:08pm

    One solution...

    CL should surreptitiously purchase a couple of the companies that sell the spam programs and gather data on their users, then use the data for lawsuits or, perhaps, make it available to some of the more vigilante style CL users. Yes, yes, ethical concerns and all that, but man it must be tempting.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:08pm
    by Danny

    Two things I think fascinating about this.

    1. My gut tells me this is not lots of different spammers gutting CraigsList, but a very small number (maybe one). I have no data to support this gut feeling, but the gut feeling is strong.

    2. These parasites are going to destroy their host. They would get much farther much longer if they figured out some sort of symbiotic relationship.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:09pm

    Well

    by Ron

    We could kill the spammers. They're scum anyways.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:26pm
    by Overcast

    Wonder if the spammers = eBay?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:41pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    Unfortunately, the spammers have won on the personals section.

    Over the last several weeks, I have found about 1% of the posts to be non-spam. Many are obvious. They use the same 'catch phrases', have programming errors that generate obvious errors (field names present instead of actual values, mishandled quotes, age mismatch between title and body, etc.), and mismatched pictures.

    If I can catch most of these obvious spam posts via casual inspection, you would think that a Bayesian filter trained in part by feedback from CL users could do the same.

    I don't know what the ramifications concerning failed posts would be, but it might be better than having sections of the website be completely useless.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. May 23rd, 2008 @ 6:57pm

    Re: Well

    by Anonymous Coward

    Agreed, see a spam notice of any kind track its IP to the registered user and kill them.

    However, this is much less profitable than reporting news about it, lobbying about it, using it as a politcal grandstanding technique, creating software to combat it, creating software to support it, creating analytical firms to help comabt and suport the combative and supportive effort, get a review commity to review how well the analyzers analyze, and then create 100 blogs about all of it with ad space, not to mention all the bandwith and hardware it takes to do all of those.

    Kill some scum or spend millions, in the end what's it really matter when all you've done is be wasteful?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. May 23rd, 2008 @ 7:08pm

    Defeating CHAPTCHA is a violation of the DMCA

    by John

    In a recent case decided in the 9th Circuit the District Court ruled that defeating CHAPTCHA was a violation of both 17 U.S.C. 1201(a) and 17 U.S.C. 1201(b). The Court reasoned that CHAPTCHA "both controls access to protected work because a user cannot proceed to copyright-protected webpages without solving CHAPTCHA, and protects rights, of a copyright owner because, by preventing automated access to the ticket purchase webpage, CHAPTCHA prevents users from copying those pages." Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Techs., Inc., 507 F.Supp. 2d 1096 at 1111-1112 (C.D. Cal 2007).

    Now I know many of "us" disagree with the DMCA however, it looks to me like Craigslist could use this to prevent the distribution of the software these spammers are using. Maybe, just maybe, in this instance the DMCA could be a good thing.

    -john

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. May 23rd, 2008 @ 7:11pm

    A fun solution

    by Anonymous Coward

    Most of these ads are easily identified as bogus. Do what I do, and pretend to be interested in the bogus product, drag it out, waste as much of the scammer/spammers time as possible. Send them mail from bogus accounts, give them phoney telephone numbers, etc.
    If they had to dig through hundreds of people pretending to buy whatever they were trying to sell or scam, they would have to work to figure out who was a real target, vs who was just pretending to be a target.We all know they are too lazy to work, or they wouldn't be trying to rip people off.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. May 23rd, 2008 @ 7:21pm
    by Andy``

    Did they try using a random simple question system alongside the CAPTCHA? I have no idea whether such a system would be easily bypassable, nor what amount of variation and fresh input would be needed keep up with attempts to get around it, but it could discourage the spammers enough to make them give up, or at least slow down a bit. I've seen it work very effectively on smaller scale sites that have had spam problems, so you never know what upscaling the idea could do.

    However, how effectively any anti-spam measure works probably, in part, depends on the motivations of the spammer...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. May 23rd, 2008 @ 7:25pm

    there is a solution

    by Bernard

    the simple answer is to charge for posting. CL can charge 99c for single posts and that will address the problem. Spam is not a problem limited to an online world. If the post office was to deliver letters without stamps, it will be killed by "Spammers". Besides, 99c will allow CL to beef up their services.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. May 23rd, 2008 @ 8:11pm

    spammers

    Spammers have completely destroyed the Las Vegas computers section. Up until about 3 months ago it was great, now 1 guy has managed to make it completely useless. Sad thing is that it's been pointed out to CL exactly who this guy is, but they won't do anything apparently cause he just keeps doing it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. May 23rd, 2008 @ 8:13pm

    Re:

    thats was my 1st thought as well.

    although i was reluctant to let the conspiracy theorist in me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. May 23rd, 2008 @ 8:17pm

    Re: Re:

    (oops)

    ... out.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. May 23rd, 2008 @ 11:22pm

    Re: Defeating CHAPTCHA is a violation of the DMCA

    by Anonymous Coward

    The Court reasoned that CHAPTCHA "both controls access to protected work because a user cannot proceed to copyright-protected webpages without solving CHAPTCHA, and protects rights, of a copyright owner because, by preventing automated access to the ticket purchase webpage, CHAPTCHA prevents users from copying those pages."
    CHAPTCHA prevents copying? Now there's a court that really doesn't know what it's talking about. How stupid can they get?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. May 23rd, 2008 @ 11:51pm

    Re: Token Charge is the answer

    by Free Market

    Charging even 1 cent for the posting would be enough. It is the economics of free spamming that make it reasonable for the spammers to keep it up. If we were to charge just 1 penny per posting or email for that matter, the spammers would dry up.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. May 24th, 2008 @ 5:21am

    CL now needs to charge!!!

    by Paul L

    How about 99 cents to post with proceeds benefiting charitable causes in that specific CL market? If it not worth 99 cents for a poster to place the ad, it sure isn't worth my time to read it. Imagine, filtering out all the spam and making CL useful again while benefiting local the local community!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. May 24th, 2008 @ 7:31am
    by Lucretious

    The "Erotic" section is being defended heavily. Thank you Craig!

    BTW, that blackhat site seems to be aware of a rumor thats going around that CL will start charging $5 a pop for sections that require phone verification. I've heard this myself.

    I'm all for it if it decreases spam. I run a weekly ad out of the household services section and would like to see it continue to generate income for me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. May 24th, 2008 @ 7:42am

    Re: Token Charge is the answer

    by david

    How would you charge just one cent?
    ...use a credit card?
    well, the CC company charges percent of the transaction and a minimum transaction fee!!!
    And, than you have to deal with people who want refunds or error or CC scams and so on...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  20. May 24th, 2008 @ 7:54am

    one thing is clear...there will be no clear winner

    by joe

    You don't really need to keep score on this one. Where humans are clicking and the postings are free, there will be spammers, and they will automate (they will start by hand but if its profitable, competition will come and then they will need to scale to keep ahead of each other, not so much Craigslist). The commenter who thinks its mostly 1 guy fails to note that there are several products in the marketplace to assist this sort of advertising,not to mention the many talented programmers that make their own systems so they are not caught when CL develops techniques to counter the techniques of the most common applications. CL has worked harder than almost anyone else of size tocounteact spam, but if they succeeded,they'd be the first ones who did.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  21. May 24th, 2008 @ 7:57am

    These spammers will eventually kill craigslist. When people start to see that everything is spam, they will stop shopping there. It is in the interest of the spammers and craigslist to work out some sort of resolution. Or CL needs to beef up the security even further.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  22. May 24th, 2008 @ 8:38am
    by Lucretious

    It is in the interest of the spammers and craigslist to work out some sort of resolution.

    what sort of resolution could be worked out? It isn't one connected group. Its thousands of separate individuals looking to get their ads in-in any way possible.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  23. May 24th, 2008 @ 8:46am

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    "These parasites are going to destroy their host. They would get much farther much longer if they figured out some sort of symbiotic relationship."

    A symbiotic relationship would mean these scammers are clever. They aren't. They're lowlifes who go for the biggest profit with the least possible effort. People with this kind of ethics and IQ (somewhere between the ebola virus and the crackhead who smashed my car window to steal a GPS that wasn't there) aren't able to think long-term.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  24. May 24th, 2008 @ 8:51am

    Best way to avoid spam altogether is to read posts and investigate the links yourself ..then decide if it is relevant or not

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  25. May 24th, 2008 @ 9:13am

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    Actually there are many of them. Someone posted a link to a black hat forum, and there were a lot of people making money off of this. They are using the group/open approach to figure out how to bypass all these safety features.

    They are determined that they have every right to destroy CL to make money through spam.

    The real gold here is the email lists these bozos generate.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  26. May 24th, 2008 @ 9:19am

    Re: A fun solution

    by Anonymous Coward

    AC - these guys are harvesting email addresses, and sending porn spam.

    There is no long drawn out playing with them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  27. May 24th, 2008 @ 10:36am

    Re: there is a solution

    by Chiropetra

    Charging a small amount for a service is probably the best answer from an economic standpoint.

    Spam exists because it is essentially free to the spammer. The returns are so low that even a 99 cent charge would make it unprofitable.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  28. May 24th, 2008 @ 10:44am

    Pay Ads and Human Verification...

    by Freedom

    Seems like the best way to solve this is to do the $0.99 per ad listed and then follow up with human verification of all postings. The $0.99 will provide enough money for human verification services and also ensure that the person listing is serious.

    You could also setup a special verified account holder status and after certain milestones are meet they no longer have to pay and be verified until someones flags their listings as suspect.

    Besides that, best way to stay in front of automated listing agents is to constantly change your verification methods - use different CAPTCHA's, random questions, and keep it as variable as possible. Any system can be broken, but a system that changes every day and is unique for every listing is for all practical purposes a royal PITA for the spammers.

    Another interesting idea would be to setup a wiki like volunteers that would review ads before they are listed and can any that are questionable. Essentially local moderators for high-spam sections, etc.

    Freedom

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  29. May 24th, 2008 @ 11:59am

    99 cents per account

    by Paul

    Charge 99 cents per account, or 5 dollers per account, just dont charge per post, if your account gets hit with the spam button a few to many times, im sorry, your a spammer.

    Put the rules out ahead of time and you will be fine.

    somethingawful forms costs I think 20 dollers for an account, Thousands of people pay this fee, mods are free to ban accounts and those who get banned are free to make new accounts, making the website more money. Spammers are non-existant on that website (from a readers point of view)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  30. May 24th, 2008 @ 12:54pm
    by chrism

    gotta love a linkbait article condeming spammers!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  31. May 24th, 2008 @ 7:15pm

    Re: there is a solution

    by Ramez

    As Bernard said, I think they'll need to charge as well, but I dont think they will be able to charge per post. That would limit the number of new people that use it as well as the long tail of items people post on there. Instead, I think they should charge $1 per email account you register with them and maybe ask you to set up a small profile. That way, spammers would have to pay $1 for every email they try to register and then you could also tie the credit card to a real address and name. As their email addresses continue getting blocked, it will get more expensive for these spammers to keep registering. Maybe even $0.50 is enough to charge.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  32. May 24th, 2008 @ 11:07pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    So, what's going to stop spammers from jacking other people's account information (bank, credit card, etc.) instead and use those for the 99c charge?

    It's back and forth, a never ending battle. You need to strike at the root of the cause, not the symptoms. What's the incentive behind spamming anyway? I can never figure it out. But if you take away the incentive, you'll take away the reason for spammers being there in the first place.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  33. May 25th, 2008 @ 2:05am

    Re: one thing is clear...there will be no clear winner

    What REALLY gets my 'goat' so to speak, is that they seem to concentrate on single cities.
    I live in Atlanta, and just about
    - every - single - category -
    in the Jobs section is innundated with these pathetic frakking ''work from home___vgthzq4fc6th'' and such like type ads - easy to spot but a pain in de derriere iff'n yer really looking for anything OTHER than a scam - I wish Craigs (this might be a solution) would offer a reward to
    1) sign in as your client ID to the list
    2) track your activity on the List
    3) REWARD you for spotting the spam's!! (30 spotted=free post in a paid section or something like that - hell, there's lots of ways to pay back - and, eventually you'd have the peeps that develop the spamming s'ware developing stuff that SPOTS the spam because they'd get rewarded for it - nice little twist on reality there, hey?)

    I go to a few different cities each day looking for biz, {not posting!!} Replying to posts, and I dont see nearly the amount of spam in any other city - -
    Soo, thats my bee-atch for tonite - SEO rules!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  34. May 25th, 2008 @ 7:03am

    Re: Defeating CHAPTCHA is a violation of the DMCA

    by Haywood

    Once the genie is out of the bottle...
    DVD-Decrypt is no longer allowed to be distributed, give me 10 minutes and I'll have a copy.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  35. May 25th, 2008 @ 7:17am

    It wouldn't make it go a way.....

    by Haywood

    But it would slow it down if you had to log on to post. I was surprised when I first posted; that you didn't even need to register to post. The $0.99 per post, or even account idea would work, but it would kill off the free stuff section. CL has grown exponentially because of the open and free nature of it, but that is also its Achilles heel. I do devote as much time as I can to moderating, and so do a lot of others in my area, consequentially, spam isn't all that bad here.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  36. May 25th, 2008 @ 9:13am

    uhhh really simple solution

    by Stinkles

    just require users to register with a paid email account (your ISP email account)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  37. May 25th, 2008 @ 9:46am
    by John Smith

    No. If software is what they are using to bypass the spam filtering then software can block them permannetly

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  38. May 25th, 2008 @ 10:21am

    Re: A fun solution

    by Moschops

    I agree, there's a time to fight fire with fire - even better do it automatically.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  39. May 25th, 2008 @ 10:40am

    Their business model has run it's course, and just use RSS.

    by Steevo

    The trouble Craiglist has is that their business model has run it's course. It no longer works. Free ads are being subverted by the spammers and CL now has to adapt.

    Things that are free have no value, and CL likely has insufficient capital to fight fire with fire.

    They need to hire human mods to review all ads before they go live. Expensive. A couple weeks of that and the spammers would go away. But they probably can't do it.

    They could sue the people who are posting the spam, but that might cost too much for their "free" business model.

    There is no good solution for their method of doing business to fight the legions of spammers who are trying to make money by stealing resources from CL and everyone else.

    One thing that makes CL still pretty useful for me is by taking it as an RSS feed. I use Sharpreader to read CL and it picks up my searches and loads them locally.

    One thing this does is it gives you the ad "instantly". You don't have to click the website to see what the heck that is or whether it's the same as the one right below it. It's all there.

    Come to think of it, if CL gave you a brief abstract of each ad right in the category list, enough to tell whether it's spam or not, you wouldn't have to click on the spam to find out what it is and that might make the spam nearly worthless.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  40. May 25th, 2008 @ 1:20pm

    How can you promote a service or product Legally on CL?

    by Phill

    I have been looking for new ways to advertise on the net and was told by a friend that CL was a graet place to advertise because of the high exposure. I've spent several days researching ways to advertise on CL and all I've seen are ways to GAME the system with either software or hiring a firm to post for you like POST2CRAIG or ITSYOURPOST which I'm not even sure are legal and trying to post manually one at a time seems like an effort in futility. This leads me to ask the question is CL a viable way to effectively advertise on the net?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  41. May 25th, 2008 @ 6:54pm

    agreed

    by katy

    besides the complete anonynmity of craigslist and the associated dangers,I find the spamming to have gotten overly ridiculous. Recently I have come across a website caleed flugpo.com which blows craigs out of the water. I seems safer, its free, and is much cleaner, of both content and spam.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  42. May 25th, 2008 @ 7:14pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    Phill: the people who tell you craigslist is a place to advertise your product or service AT ALL are the spammers and scammers and get-rich-quickers.

    If you're a business selling product or service, PAY FOR ADVERTISING and STAY OFF CRAIGSLIST.

    Thank you, good night.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  43. May 26th, 2008 @ 1:52am

    You know what would be funny?

    by Dave

    While browsing that lowlife "blackhat" spammer forum you linked to, I suddenly realized that it would be the most hilarious thing in the world if, all of a sudden, somebody decided to build an efficient forum-spamming tool tailored for this site.

    That somebody would definitely be my personal hero.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  44. May 26th, 2008 @ 10:03am

    One solution.

    by magoo

    Have a human review all submittals before they get posted to the live site.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  45. May 26th, 2008 @ 12:29pm

    Re:

    by comboman

    So, what's going to stop spammers from jacking other people's account information (bank, credit card, etc.) instead and use those for the 99c charge?

    If I was a criminal with access to someones bank or cc info, I can think of a lot better ways to spend it than funding spam (a different criminal activity with a much lower payout rate).

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  46. May 26th, 2008 @ 1:04pm

    stop it at the source

    by Dutch

    I agree with Brooks, except purchasing the SPAM companies doesn't sound financial feasible. However I do agree that the best way to stop the spam is to attack it at the source. I'm not sure the legality of a SPAM post on a site such as Craigslist but maybe the company can follow Nintendo's suit when they raided the MOD chip creators, I guess that may be difficult unless they can prove they used the anti-SPAM software...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  47. May 26th, 2008 @ 3:31pm
    by Sigmund Leominster

    Steevo (comment 39) has probably hit the proverbial nail on the head with his comment on the business model based on "free" services. The old adage of "there's no such thing as a free lunch" is still serviceable and when someone claims something is "free," it's worth digging a little to see who benefits - cui bono, as those Romans said.

    With Craig's List, the fundamental issue is that when benefits comes in the shape of a response to a post, the way to increase your chance of getting a response is simply to increase the number of your posts. And if those post take no effort and are free, then the result is clear - spam.

    We all want things free. Some people will spend hours online looking for a crack/hack to a program that costs $30 - and if a few hours of your time is worth MORE than that, you'd be better of paying the cash and doing something more productive! But free can also mean poorer quality, no support, flaky performance, and lots of hassle. Sometimes the "free" solution ends up being expensive.

    And here is where Craig's List sits - a great idea and very very free, but now a victim of its own success to the point of near extinction. Like many "free" enterprises before, the choice is now between closing the doors and charging a fee. I hope the later is preferred.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  48. May 26th, 2008 @ 7:47pm
    by Jayson

    Charge 5 dollars to open an account. 'Nuff said.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  49. May 26th, 2008 @ 10:04pm

    Re:

    I've been impressed with the ASIRRA CAPTCHA here: http://research.microsoft.com/asirra/ Very difficult to hack...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  50. May 26th, 2008 @ 11:37pm

    A Solution

    by Software Engineer

    For those that recommend charging, this would kill CL's business model. However, the need to charge is still valid. To reconcile the two, CL needs to partner with a number of companies (itunes, amazon, paypal, a paid email service, etc). The user then has the option to a) purchase a CL account or b) purchase something from a partner store who will essentially verify to CL that the account is valid. I wouldn't pay to post a small item on CL, but I WOULD buy something from a partner store - that I needed - if that would verify me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  51. May 27th, 2008 @ 2:27am

    Safe Websites

    Spaming has to be stopped by some other means. But Charging for the service will not the serve the purpose. It can restrict spams to some extent but it will afect the company's image in the marke. Craigslist is a free online classified and charging will cause complete change in a business policy. Other online classified which provide there service for free include clickindia.com and thisismyindia.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  52. May 27th, 2008 @ 5:41am

    open proxy check

    I've done it with a Movable Type plugin before and CL should do it as well: for each submission, go back to the originating IP and check if you find an open proxy server there. This check is done within seconds and it will weed out a heck of a lot of spam submissions.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  53. May 27th, 2008 @ 5:50am

    Re: One solution.

    by mkam

    Do you have any idea how many posts are submitted to craigslist per minute. Even if a human can make a spam/no spam decision in a couple of seconds, sustainable for a 8 hour work day, you would still need a ton of reviewers. I think it is probably a scaling problem that can't be solved with more people.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  54. May 27th, 2008 @ 9:58am

    Theft of Service?

    by Anon C. O'ward

    Can someone be charged with 'theft of service' if the service is provided free-of-charge. Providing the service has costs associated with it, which spammers are, in effect, stealing by violating the TOS.
    If they could, would not anyone providing the software that enables the theft be liable for some kind of criminal enterprise charges?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  55. May 27th, 2008 @ 10:06am

    Re: Re: A fun solution

    by Einstein

    If you use CL you can set up an email that is only used to respond to postings or post merchandise. That is how I get around it. I just empty the mail before I post so I can see if I get any responses.
    Cheers!

    (perhaps only a short term fix but it works for me)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  56. May 27th, 2008 @ 1:44pm

    Fight fire with fire

    by Anonymous Coward

    Though probably against Craig's "moral compass", I think those blackhat forums would be a lot less useful if, oh, I dunno, one day an onslaught of spam started appearing in them... and their own tactics were used to continue to do so...

    Sometimes the best defense is a good offense.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  57. May 27th, 2008 @ 10:34pm

    cl

    by screw it all

    everyone who talks about the erotic services section complain about spammers, well all girls post more then one ad on there. The real problem is with craigslist promoting prostitution. Everyone gets mad when they are a legal service and consider it spam, wtf... get mad at the hookers how are spreading stds and setting you up with the cops, not the girls who offer a legal erotic service..

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  58. May 28th, 2008 @ 7:30am

    Better than CAPTCHA

    by David Rowell

    Very interesting indeed. I'm amazed that OCR systems can read the distorted letters and numbers that are part of creating a Google email account or apparently Craigslist posting. I find it increasingly hard to do this myself!

    Here's an idea - they should replace the character recognition requirement that is the CAPTCHA process with instead a little question/answer such as 'What is the result if you multiply 2 by two' or 'Enter the third word in this sentence into the verification box', or 'What day of the week is it tomorrow' or anything like that. The possibilities of simple question/answer routines are vast, and if they act as a filter requiring people to have a double digit IQ as well that would be a bonus. :)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  59. May 28th, 2008 @ 7:40am
    by Robabard

    Brilliant! I've thought the same thing.
    eBay is the great enemy of CL.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  60. May 28th, 2008 @ 9:30am

    Charging and flagging don't mix

    by mellymai

    I use Backpage all the time and have no problem whatsoever with paying to post an ad, but I do think it's ridiculous that even Backpage has buttons by which you can flag a PAID post. It's a well known fact that there is not only excessive spam on Craigs and other similar sites, but excessive flagging. If I am a legitimate poster who has paid for my ad, that doesn't mean that someone can't come along and for invalid reasons of competition or just plain trolling flag my ad down. If Craigs starts charging for its posts, too, it needs to eliminate invalid flagging, or trolls will be sitting out there getting the biggest kick out of seeing PAID ads disappear for no reason.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  61. May 28th, 2008 @ 2:37pm
    by SluttyNerdGirl

    I think they should just pay a few of the wankers that read craigslist personal ads anyway to have authority to pull down obvious spam.

    I'm here because my favorite category, Missed Connections, is totally overrun by formulaic ads for fake women looking for dates.

    There must be legal issues involved because these all have photos of women. I'm sure these women didn't give consent to have the spammers use their images.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  62. May 29th, 2008 @ 1:24pm
    by dave

    but who pays the spammers anyway? Seems like those guys are almost worse....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  63. May 30th, 2008 @ 12:49am

    Stopping spammage

    We've just spent the last 6 months fighting spam on our site. Some lessons: - Human review is quite ineffective, many spam posts are copies of real posts from real people; we have seen human moderation regularly disagree with our spam detection and on a closer look prove wrong. - There are different kinds of spammers, running all the way from script-kiddies running scripts, dudes sat in African Internet Cafés to serious hackers (quite a few coming out of Russia). - Think iterative, don't try and come up with the best system ever. Start, review, improve. We have got to the point where our accuracy is not really quite high, it is possible! For those of you asking about how spammers get paid, see here for some examples (also there are some tips on how to stay safe online): http://classifieds.justlanded.com/en/stay_safe_online

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  64. May 30th, 2008 @ 12:51am

    Re: Stopping spammage

    Doh! "where our accuracy is not really quite high" should read "where our accuracy is really quite high"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  65. May 31st, 2008 @ 1:48pm

    what i don't get is

    by geoff

    why is it when i am looking for a stepvan or whatever i see the same bastard's ad A HUNDRED TIMES (http://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/sss?query=step%20van) and yet when i post just TWO similarly-worded yet very distinct sales ads in two different categories to maximize my search results i get a notice saying that it's "too similar" to another ad. What are these spamers using to have such success? and what kind of fool would pay $4600 for a 30 year old stepvan anyways?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  66. Jun 6th, 2008 @ 8:32am

    Anti-Technology

    I've been on the move away from landlines for years now. It started for me in 2003 with trying out Vonage. The only line I have is my cell phone but I route most of my calls through Skype and now GrandCentral. This is a bad move. There could certainly be something in place to establish the age of Skype accounts as a means to verify that they weren't created just yesterday. How about authentication to a third party tied into OpenID? I agree the spam has increased and someone was actually murdered in Minneapolis here after responding to a Craigslist ad (http://wcco.com/local/katherine.ann.olson.2.461959.html) but blocking VOIP services isn't the solution.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  67. Jun 13th, 2008 @ 3:25pm

    email lists

    by mb

    Are email lists that lucrative? The spam posters in the "motorcycles" section don't respond to emails so they must just want your email address.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  68. Jun 14th, 2008 @ 9:00am

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    stop spamming with your link this website www.custompcmax.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  69. Jun 16th, 2008 @ 12:24pm

    CL could prevent some spam by allowing a little more flexibility

    by Mike W

    There are some pretty simple things that Craigslist could do to help fight some of the spam.

    One typical type of spam that I see is when someone posts the same ad in numerous geographic locations, which Craigslist prohibits.

    Craigslist should re-think this policy. If someone is selling something that might interest buyers in multiple geographic regions, why not make it so that the poster can post one single ad that can appear in whichever geographic regions the poster chooses?

    Similary, if a poster is selling something that fits more than 1 category, allow the poster to specify up to 3 different categories, such that the one ad appears in all 3. (EBay does this.)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  70. Jun 21st, 2008 @ 12:24am

    Re: Re: Defeating CHAPTCHA is a violation of the DMCA

    by jimbo

    Hey, what do you expect? Court decisions are made by LAWYERS. Enough said.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  71. Jun 29th, 2008 @ 11:35am

    Post2Craig services

    Lately, Post2Craig.com is getting a bad wrap about it's services. People need to understand that Post2Craig is set up to help the consumer with valuable postings for Craiglist. Post2Craig.com will not and cannot post stupid pyramid schemes or cash gifting programs. ITV Ventures or any kind of marketing techniques that you are selling. Post2Craig.com has the right to post who and what they want. Currently they are helping a lot of consumers post valuable services, and products on Craigslist. If you are interested in posting I urge you to check out www.Post2Craig.com but if you are just looking for someone to bail you out because your service is crap and you cannot post on craigslist anymore do not pay because we do not offer refunds.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  72. Jun 29th, 2008 @ 1:46pm

    craigslist spam

    by michael bolick

    Maybe this is slightly off subject but my problem with spam on craigs list is on the other side. When I post to cl I will get a response(do you still have it) and I reply yes ,almost immediatly I start getting spammed.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  73. Jul 3rd, 2008 @ 11:36pm

    the answer is comprehensive reform

    by SpammersGoAway

    I read every single posting above and have decided that the only solution is a comprehensive approach:

    1.Rotating anti-spam software, because no one version is infallible
    2.Human moderators to both screen ads (for legitimacy only, not content) and to remove obvious violators of policy
    3.Above to be paid by LEGIT advertisers who partner with CL to display their banner ads, special offers, etc.

    Costs for updating steps 1 & 2 would be off-set by revenues from 3. It'd be a wash, and a small price to pay (figurtively speaking) to have our CL back without asking for posters to pay any money out of pocket =)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  74. Jul 8th, 2008 @ 11:18pm

    Yess.. craigslist is very interesting for spammer

    I agree.. craigslist is one of very popular web application. and million user from US. You know from US only in one month spent million dollar for buying online!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  75. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:08pm

    Re: How can you promote a service or product Legally on CL?

    by rob

    Hey Phil, it's unfotunate for you that spammers have created a hostile attitude towards advertising. You know damn well most people hate spam. Craiglist has a "services" section where LOCAL people can advertise their services. Yes, there is a large group of people there, but don't ruin our experience for us. If Craigslist wanted ads, they would charge for them. Or is it that you're just looking for free advertising for which you give nothing back? I don't symapthize with you in that respect, and don't give me that "but, I'm a small business owner" crap. Follow the rules and don't cry when no one wants what you're selling.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  76. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:08pm

    Re: How can you promote a service or product Legally on CL?

    by rob

    Hey Phil, it's unfotunate for you that spammers have created a hostile attitude towards advertising. You know damn well most people hate spam. Craiglist has a "services" section where LOCAL people can advertise their services. Yes, there is a large group of people there, but don't ruin our experience for us. If Craigslist wanted ads, they would charge for them. Or is it that you're just looking for free advertising for which you give nothing back? I don't symapthize with you in that respect, and don't give me that "but, I'm a small business owner" crap. Follow the rules and don't cry when no one wants what you're selling.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  77. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:16pm

    Re: Post2Craig services

    by rob

    uhm , wait, you're charging money to post in a free ads website? Fuckin jerks! It's supposed to be free!!!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  78. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:18pm

    Re: Charging and flagging don't mix

    by Anonymous Coward

    good point!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  79. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:24pm

    Re: Post2Craig services

    by rob

    p.s. your website looks like you spent all of five minutes to put together with your wack template. But I guess credibility doesn't matter to you. After all, you ARE doing selling a service in the grey area. I don't wish you the best of luck on your desperate attempt at a legit business.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  80. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:29pm

    Re: craigslist spam

    by rob

    I've had the same thing done to me. next time, edit your ad to say "if the ad is still up, I've still got it" and clearly state to "leave a number"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  81. Jul 9th, 2008 @ 2:41pm

    Re: the answer is comprehensive reform

    by rob

    Hey, I really liked your post. I could deal with banner ads(NO POP UPS THOUGH!!!!!) on craigslist in exchange for better reliability. Craigslist has been a godsend, thanks guys & gals @CL. and thanks to the flagging community!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  82. Jul 10th, 2008 @ 4:02pm

    We the Spammers of Craigslist

    by John Doe

    We are the largest CL posting company, we have approached craigslist on numerous occasions in order to conduct a merger that will allow paid & free postings and a guaranteed way of permanently removing spam however Newmark still thinks that this is his little baby and he refuses to let it grow. Captcha has been bypassed, Phone verification is crap since we are making more money selling verified accounts than anything else what’s next? Voice recognition? Well guess what we have someone working in craigslist so no matter what comes out we will always get past it even if they invent paid postings! For all those that think that we are a scam well maybe the smaller companies like post2craig and ItsYourPost are but I can guarantee you that every ad we post are legitimate ads for jobs or services since we do what no other company does and that’s quality control, we don’t just post any junk for anyone and never will, we wish to preserve craigslist but not with the crap people post we even tried sending links to all the spam posts and scam ads and they repaid us by shutting down our server, well we are back up and with a vengeance, CRAIGSLIST HAS BEEN ASSIMILATED RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  83. Jul 23rd, 2008 @ 1:17pm

    Re: spammers

    by Batman

    Tell me who they are and I will go deal withthem personally.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  84. Jul 23rd, 2008 @ 1:20pm

    Spam the Spammers...

    by David

    Let's develop some software to spam the spammers. Over load their mail box's so badly that it make it unprofitable for them to spam.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  85. Jul 28th, 2008 @ 2:21am
    by Peugeot-rider

    I tend to agree that the most effective anti-spam tool is to make listings not free but it also has consequences. Most of what I put on CL is free so now it will cost to give away and couple that with more people reluctant to drive to pickup will probably mean Goodwill or the Salvation Army will be the best solution again.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  86. Aug 2nd, 2008 @ 9:39pm

    C/L and spamm

    by Vince

    Yeah I think C/L gets benefits from spammers
    I try to stop them
    by flagging spamm
    and C/L shut me down !!!..
    C/L told me they were going to BLOCK ME !
    for trying to block spammers,
    And all those illegal non paying job listing
    AND SOMETHING ABOUT TOO many entries on their data base
    I live 30 miles in between 4 different C/L lisiting
    So I know that C/L is in bed with The Spammers for the MONEY !!
    every good paying job SPAMM
    every good freebee SPAMM
    every good anything ( NOT GREAT ) SPAMM
    You flagg and they kick you off !!!!

    ?????? lets see ?????

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  87. Aug 4th, 2008 @ 1:28pm

    anyone know how to design an interactive site similar to craigslist?

    by zachary

    I have a concept and need a websie developed. It has nothing to do with craigslist and will not be competition. If anything it may HELP craigslist customers.

    Telecommuting would be ok and while not necessary it would be helpful if you were in the Dallas / Ft worth area.

    Part time to start and as it grows we will need full time web support . . . would you be available then too?

    if this sounds interesting to you or you know someone that might "fit" please email me at zachary@e-scrapsolutions.com

    thanks!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  88. Aug 6th, 2008 @ 7:05pm

    GRRRRR

    by me

    I say we just start tracking down the spammers, going to their houses and cutting off their fucking heads with large hunting knives. It's the only surefire way to make them stop.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  89. Aug 17th, 2008 @ 9:26pm

    Re: GRRRRR

    by John

    That's sounds really bright, Einstein.
    Many of these spammers use trojan horse programs to hijack the computers of innocent people and then use those computer IPs to post spam until the IP is blocked by craigslist.

    Fools like you make these suggestions without even thinking about the consequences. Thank God you're not in charge of policing Cl. You should be ashamed of yourself for even considering such a suggestion.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  90. Aug 21st, 2008 @ 11:12am

    Re: question!

    by Tim

    Thats it! Make posters answer regional questions that only people who live there could know-- like if you lived in sacramento, just ask a question like "what city is next to roseville?" and change the questions all the time. If they actually live there, they would have no problem answering. It would require someone to make new questions all the time, since repeated questions would go into a database for spam programs.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  91. Aug 21st, 2008 @ 11:27am

    Re: craigslist spam

    by Tim

    the only thing you should post when replying to "for sale" is : whats your phone number-- thats it. NO phone number, no talky, no saley.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  92. Aug 24th, 2008 @ 9:43pm

    Spammers on craigslist? - You fools!

    by PH

    All you people talk about is spam! You talk about wits, IQ, etrc...Uh...duh. Think about it! - What is spam? - spam is unsolicited mail you crack heads!!! An organization such as Craigslist may call unwanted ads spam "internally" - but that's as far as it goes!!! No one put a gun to your head to read it!!! DUH!!! - Screw them! This is their problem if you call it a problem! Oh yeah - and you idiots that keep flaggin everyone else out to put your "self rightious ads in"... - I am the one flagging you back you peice of crap idiots! - Thinking you are all "rightious" all "knowing" and so on..."YOU DO NOT OWN CRAIGSLIST!!!" - It is not for "YOU" to decide anyways!!! - Flag those around you - "YOU" get flagged back and so "THERE GOES YOUR AD TOO" you morons!!!
    People talk about spammers "They probably work harder than you do" to get get good affiliated info out to the public in the first place! Honestly, I think most people are "too lazy" to post ads to begin with, so then, they are jealous because the "other guy" had "the brains" to get more ads than they could out on the net!!! - Jealousy!!! - That is what all of this is about! - You are pissed because you do not make good money, and the legit ad posters that actually "work" and "think" "DO!" Think it's easy to post, and that these people are low life's etrc, etrc..."TRY IT YOURSELF!" - You talk about killing "spammers" which are actually business people advertising? - Think again!!! - Go "get one of em' " ...and they might just be military trained like me, and do not miss like me you peice of crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  93. Aug 24th, 2008 @ 9:52pm

    Re: Spammers on craigslist? - You fools!

    by Jim D

    Yeah, I have to agree. Before people talk about going out and grabbing up people to do this and that to them, (spammer or not) they should really think about it a great deal. I mean, do they really think they are going to go up to someone's door and do all of this to them? A lot of folks are pcking shotguns for home defense, and if anyone thinks they are going to waltz right in should really think again. They might get a waltz of buckshot right at them in the end...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  94. Aug 24th, 2008 @ 10:15pm
    by Master P Jam

    There are a lot of work at home mother's out there following instructions from their main companies to post legitimate ads for things like dieting, overall health related products and so on, and they often do not make very much money for their families, but stuck at home with the kids unable to pay babysitting costs. More often than not, they post ads to free classifieds to get the word out. What is not lawful, is unsolicited email! If you send an email to someone without permission, you are breaking the law. If you post adds to classifieds, there is no law broken. At best an organization's policy may be broken, but that really is their problem. Mainly, it is one thing to have your email invaded. It is another when it comes to classified ads. The other poster is correct, in that no one is putting a gun to your head to read that ad. If you get "suckered" into it, I would say that writer was one hell of a writer and wrote a great subject line/ad body to get your attention in the first place! Do not look at is as getting spammed because you really were not. Instead, give that writer a medal, regardless of your short attention span, and just consider them better than you are. Perhaps the one's that do well with that, living in better homes and driving better cars than you may make you mad. Do not be mad. Copy that success for yourself, or get a high degree with a high paying job. Ultimately, "We the people" can decide, but you have to get in there and speak up! Until everyone get's together and make "ad posting" illegal, and form it all into law, we have what we have, and that is it. For now, I will tell you this...I post 1,000 ads per day. I don't think that you can do that, but I would love to see you try...

    Then, I want to know what your definition of spamming really is...Oh yeah, I defend my home rather heavily. Beyond that, what I have standing ready in my yard, I will not tell you, but anyone looking to trespass might be in for an unfortunate surprise..."FACE TOWARD ENEMEY"...click, click, click...bye bye.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  95. Aug 27th, 2008 @ 12:38am

    reply

    I think the management at Craig's List ought to hire some big time spam fighters on full time basis. With a staff of less than 30, I'm sure they can afford it...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  96. Aug 30th, 2008 @ 6:04am

    Re: 99 cents per account

    by Brooke

    "if your account gets hit with the spam button a few to many times, im sorry, your a spammer."

    Not true. In my area, spammers actually flag down all the real ads to dominate certain sections. I think craigslist has actually blocked my IP due to my multiple attempts to keep my ad up. The spammers have craigslist convinced I'm a spammer... It's becoming a useless website.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  97. Aug 31st, 2008 @ 1:36pm

    Re: One solution.

    by rockwell

    Remember in the 90's, when you wanted to post to CL you had to have your ad approved by Craig? Had to sometimes wait a few days to see it show up on the site, but when it got there, you knew it was real. I remember being shocked when CL went to automated posting - it was 6-7 years ago? And am suprised it took this long for it to become a site killing issue...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  98. Sep 1st, 2008 @ 2:02pm

    Re: A fun solution

    by Jim H.

    It would never work in Personals, the most abused section on CL.
    Without fail, every spammer in this section leads you to visit xxxblackbook, ifriends, etc.
    Whether you actually join or not doesn't matter; just visiting the target site for one brief page view gets the spammer paid.
    Want a real bonus? i friends will pay you $80 if you get someone to join as a FREE account, betting on the come that the free account will becaome a paid account.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  99. Sep 1st, 2008 @ 2:12pm

    Re: Re: 99 cents per account

    by Jim H.

    It's long been my contention that spammers flag legit ads in Personals in an attempt to limit the # of viewable ads.
    It makes sense that a spammer who posts 6 ads in a row flagg all the ads before and after his/her block of spam.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  100. Sep 1st, 2008 @ 2:16pm

    Re: uhhh really simple solution

    by Jim H.

    And programs like CL Autopost will gladly generate 1000's of real gmail address's, all of them throwaways.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  101. Sep 2nd, 2008 @ 2:49am

    It's a damn shame

    by D.

    It was a fantastic site years ago but now it's turning to complete garbage. Give it time and it's going to be completely over run and there's nothing that can be done to save it now. Too bad.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  102. Sep 3rd, 2008 @ 4:48pm

    Spam

    by Arbi

    Why would anyone who is just been fooled by replying to posting on CL want to visit the site or try the products the spammers are pushing?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  103. Sep 7th, 2008 @ 7:15am
    by Anonymous Coward

    4chan /b/ has a higher volume of posts than any one city's craigslist, and less than 30% spam, because they have some volunteer mods with the power to permaban anyone's IP address unilaterally.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  104. Sep 8th, 2008 @ 1:04am

    You people are stupid

    by jason

    HAHAHA! I read everyone of your post on here. Every suggestion you people have to stop spammers will not work. I know because I am one. You people are not code programmers so you really do not know what you are talking about. The only way to stop spam is to shut the internet down. Thats it...period. Everytime they make something to stop spam, the spammers just get around it. There is no possible way to end it. You can't track IP addresses because we use different ones everytime. and haha no we don't hijack someones computer with trojens. Trying to find a spammer is like picking up a rock in the middle of the desert and tracking the last person in the world that ever touched it. The only smart thing i saw in there was for there to be some sort of alliance between the spammers and the sites we are posting on. But still we are not going to play by the rules if it means less money. What the hell is wrong with making the most money possible with the least effort possible. I'll make 800 bucks in one day with out even doing anything. What the hell is so wrong with that. I think that maybe you people are just jealous because you can't figure out how to do it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  105. Sep 9th, 2008 @ 10:01pm

    Re:

    by me

    maybe that is their goal: destroying the host.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  106. Sep 12th, 2008 @ 10:42am

    Re: spammers

    by Brad

    Craigslist doesn't really care about the ads or that legitimate ads get flagged & people have to repost. It keeps their user count & posted/reposted ad count high. They claim Billions of hits each day, but I'm guessing the actual count is only millions. All the others are generated from auto-posting tools, & the crusade of flaggers trying to play internet police and causing an endless flow of re-posts.
    Craigslist is uniquely positioned to become a commercial enterprise, yet they keep their "non-profit" status... Why? They rely on private & government monies to continue their operations. The more hits, the more $ they can get.

    The only solution is to ID Verify users when establishing accounts & eliminate the flagging system all-together. Limit the # of ads that can be placed to about 20 a day, & suspend accounts for 10 days that are spam or fraudulent.

    When Legitimate businesses post on craigslist and are shot down by the flaggers, they step up their efforts (such as captcha outsourcing) to combat the attack on their advertising. (Advertising by legitimate business is what drives craigslist, not the personals or pets sections). Legitimate business has the $ and resources to get around CL security features, and as long as there's money to be made someone will develop programs to get around CL efforts.
    I'd like to see less spam, and also less flaggers. As a legitimate business, I'd also be willing to pay for Verified Ads that cannot be flagged.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  107. Sep 12th, 2008 @ 5:35pm

    WOW I have also noticed a massive decline in quality all over Craig's List. Too bad....it is a great idea that has gone to the dogs. No such thing as quality free anymore is there? I wonder how oodle will handle this issue?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  108. Sep 13th, 2008 @ 4:36pm

    Craigslist crappy spammers

    by Jerry V

    A lot of talk has been going on about charging for the job postings...not much ( which already goes on in CA in think) to keep them out of there. It agreeably has gotten completely out of hand!!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  109. Sep 22nd, 2008 @ 10:57am

    Changes

    by Ej

    I foresee Craigslist eventually removing the phone authentication and simply charging for every ad in every category, why would they just stop with Job & Real estate, it is going to happen.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  110. Sep 24th, 2008 @ 5:39pm

    Email Spam

    I am more worried about receiving email spam from the ads that I post on craigslist rather than just reading spam postings.

    These email spams from my craigslist ads fill up my inbox.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  111. Sep 29th, 2008 @ 1:00pm

    For Job Seekers

    by Snoodles

    The real frighting part of all this is the people that are looking for jobs on CL, that send in their resumes to total strangers! Simply do a little research folks! Check the email address in Google. Does it appear in the same ad in 9 other cities? Then it's SPAM! Contact the "employer" and ask for a FAX number and ask where the are located, I mean an actual street address! If they are a REAL place of employment, they won't have any problem giving you this info.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  112. Oct 4th, 2008 @ 6:10am

    Take a leaf out of the Government's approach with Gambling

    by JMK

    Ultimately, someone downstream buys something that the spammers' customers are trying to sell. It's at that point where the credit card companies can be used as a legal mechanism to shutdown accounts (or reverse charge) those companies who are illegitimately using spam. The government has already shutdown international gambling this way, so there is a precedent for legally enrolling the CC companies in the fight. The final piece of legal mechanism required to make this work: is to have an unambiguous "opt-opt" which cannot be circumvented by any of the wrangling that even legitimate commercial companies try to do with email address databases - the answer - anyone that has "optout" as part of their email address, automatically removes permission for anyone to send them unsolicited mail. If it happens, the user then invokes the legal mechanism above and requires the credit card company "reverse charge" for using their email address, simply by using their purchasing mechanism set up by whatever means the spammer's customer's are trying to sell their wares.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  113. Oct 8th, 2008 @ 9:31am

    You are all Crazy Craigs Nut Jobs !!! Losers

    Let me get this...if someone is not hurting anyone, and desperate to sell a product because they lost their job they are bad? Doesnt every marketing book say get your message out????

    Nobody wants to earn their living on Craigs, its not glamerous and chances are they are doing it out of desperation to pay the electric or their childs clothing and electric bills. You call them criminsals??

    Woud you rather these harmless people posting messages be on a corner selling crack or dope? What are you crazy and that angry that you are saying you will kill over it?

    The fact is posting things on the internet saying you are going to chop there heads off, kill them or blow their brains out shows YOU are the criminal and if anyone wanted to track your IP address you would be the one committing a crime with death threats.

    I have seen no spammer ever post a death threat, only here where the righteous people who deny those below the poverty level an income. One thing I know for sure is the righteous are always the vermin of society and your death threats are the criminal acts not the spammers posting to sell their solar powered toasters Jerks!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  114. Oct 8th, 2008 @ 9:33am

    Re: Yess.. craigslist is very interesting for spammer

    by You are a nut and a criminal

    Let me get this...if someone is not hurting anyone, and desperate to sell a product because they lost their job they are bad? Doesnt every marketing book say get your message out????

    Nobody wants to earn their living on Craigs, its not glamerous and chances are they are doing it out of desperation to pay the electric or their childs clothing and electric bills. You call them criminsals??

    Woud you rather these harmless people posting messages be on a corner selling crack or dope? What are you crazy and that angry that you are saying you will kill over it?

    The fact is posting things on the internet saying you are going to chop there heads off, kill them or blow their brains out shows YOU are the criminal and if anyone wanted to track your IP address you would be the one committing a crime with death threats.

    I have seen no spammer ever post a death threat, only here where the righteous people who deny those below the poverty level an income. One thing I know for sure is the righteous are always the vermin of society and your death threats are the criminal acts not the spammers posting to sell their solar powered toasters Jerks!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  115. Oct 8th, 2008 @ 9:34am

    Re: GRRRRR

    by You are a nut job and criminal

    Let me get this...if someone is not hurting anyone, and desperate to sell a product because they lost their job they are bad? Doesnt every marketing book say get your message out????

    Nobody wants to earn their living on Craigs, its not glamerous and chances are they are doing it out of desperation to pay the electric or their childs clothing and electric bills. You call them criminsals??

    Woud you rather these harmless people posting messages be on a corner selling crack or dope? What are you crazy and that angry that you are saying you will kill over it?

    The fact is posting things on the internet saying you are going to chop there heads off, kill them or blow their brains out shows YOU are the criminal and if anyone wanted to track your IP address you would be the one committing a crime with death threats.

    I have seen no spammer ever post a death threat, only here where the righteous people who deny those below the poverty level an income. One thing I know for sure is the righteous are always the vermin of society and your death threats are the criminal acts not the spammers posting to sell their solar powered toasters Jerks!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  116. Oct 18th, 2008 @ 7:00am

    Who gives a fu*K???

    by Shawn

    Really?? Just skip over it and go to something else. Not very hard to see the spam in their. People call them a lowlife but really your just like them when you have the time to worry about it. I know what is spam immediately and its not very hard to point it out, just don't click the ad if you don't like it. Very very easy solution.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  117. Oct 18th, 2008 @ 7:06am

    Also

    by Shawn

    Dumbasses all crying about CL spam. Spam wouldn't be their if noone actually bought into their program. Also many of these people who are promoting their product are not doing it themselves, they hire people like me and guess what, I have 4-5 clients every week coughing up a $1000 each one to promote what they have. So something is obviously working.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  118. Oct 20th, 2008 @ 9:40am

    tired of this all

    Iam really tired of these searching these sites as it has huge number of ads, so i would rather depend on some new seo friendly classified site like hindlist.com for my ads which is still new but worthy to post ads.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  119. Oct 23rd, 2008 @ 10:59pm

    Data Entry Job

    The internet brings to you an excellent home based business
    opportunity to earn online with your convenient timings. Genuine
    Online Jobs for Indians. No Age Limit. No Experience. Required only
    basic knowledge of computer and internet. Anyone can do this work like
    housewives, retired, students and working persons. Visit our website
    to start making EXTRA MONEY From Home www.easypostjob4u.com , or
    email us at universalpostjob4u@gmail.com, posted id GyuXXXX,
    call us at +91-9474425752

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  120. Nov 14th, 2008 @ 4:10pm

    It is a Crime... here in Texas and most states

    by Mark

    BUSINESS & COMMERCE CODE

    TITLE 4. MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL PROVISIONS

    CHAPTER 46. ELECTRONIC MAIL SOLICITATION


    § 46.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
    (1) "Commercial electronic mail message" means an
    electronic mail message that advertises, offers for sale or lease,
    or promotes any goods, services, business opportunity, property, or
    any other article, commodity, or thing of value.
    (2) "Electronic mail" means a message, file, or other
    information that is transmitted through a local, regional, or
    global computer network, regardless of whether the message, file,
    or other information is viewed, stored for retrieval at a later
    time, printed, or filtered by a computer program that is designed or
    intended to filter or screen those items.
    (3) "Electronic mail service provider" means a person
    that:
    (A) is qualified to do business in this state;
    (B) is an intermediary in sending or receiving
    electronic mail; and
    (C) provides an end user of an electronic mail
    service the ability to send or receive electronic mail.
    (4) "Established business relationship" means a prior
    or existing relationship of a person formed by a voluntary two-way
    communication between a person and another person, regardless of
    whether consideration is exchanged, regarding products or services
    offered by one of the persons, that has not been terminated by
    either party.
    (5) "Internet domain name" refers to a globally
    unique, hierarchical reference to an Internet host or service,
    assigned through a centralized Internet naming authority and
    composed of a series of character strings separated by periods with
    the right-most string specifying the top of the hierarchy.
    (6) "Obscene" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.
    21, Penal Code.
    (7) "Sender" means a person who initiates an
    electronic mail message.
    (8) "Sexual conduct" has the meaning assigned by
    Section 43.25, Penal Code.
    (9) "Unsolicited commercial electronic mail message"
    means a commercial electronic mail message sent without the consent
    of the recipient by a person with whom the recipient does not have
    an established business relationship. The term does not include
    electronic mail sent by an organization using electronic mail for
    the purpose of communicating exclusively with members, employees,
    or contractors of the organization.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.002. CERTAIN ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES
    PROHIBITED. (a) A person may not intentionally transmit a
    commercial electronic mail message that:
    (1) falsifies electronic mail transmission
    information or other routing information for an unsolicited
    commercial electronic mail message; or
    (2) contains false, deceptive, or misleading
    information in the subject line.
    (b) A person may not intentionally send a commercial
    electronic mail message that uses another person's Internet domain
    name without the other person's consent.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.003. UNSOLICITED ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES. (a) A
    person may not intentionally take any action to send an unsolicited
    commercial electronic mail message unless:
    (1) "ADV:" is used as the first four characters in the
    subject line of the message or, if the message contains any obscene
    material or material depicting sexual conduct, "ADV: ADULT
    ADVERTISEMENT" is used as the first word in the subject line of the
    message; and
    (2) the sender of the message or a person acting on
    behalf of the sender provides a functioning return electronic mail
    address to which a recipient may, at no cost to the recipient, send
    a reply requesting the removal of the recipient's electronic mail
    address from the sender's electronic mail list.
    (b) A sender shall remove a person's electronic mail address
    from the sender's electronic mail list not later than the 3rd day
    after the date on which the sender receives a request for removal of
    that address under Subsection (a)(2).

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.004. SALE OR PROVISION OF ADDRESS ON ELECTRONIC
    MAIL LIST PROHIBITED. A sender or a person acting on behalf of the
    sender may not sell or otherwise provide the electronic mail
    address of a person who requests the removal of that address from
    the sender's electronic mail list under Section 46.003(a)(2),
    except as required by other law.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.005. CRIMINAL PENALTY. A person commits an offense
    if the person intentionally takes any action to send a message
    containing obscene material or material depicting sexual conduct in
    violation of Section 46.003(a)(1). An offense under this section
    is a Class B misdemeanor.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.006. CIVIL PENALTY. (a) A person who violates
    this chapter other than Section 46.009 is liable to the state for a
    civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the lesser of:
    (1) $10 for each unlawful message or action; or
    (2) $25,000 for each day an unlawful message is
    received or an action is taken.
    (b) The attorney general or the prosecuting attorney in the
    county in which the violation occurs may:
    (1) bring suit to recover the civil penalty imposed
    under Subsection (a); and
    (2) seek an injunction to prevent or restrain a
    violation of this chapter.
    (c) The attorney general or the prosecuting attorney may
    recover reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining a civil penalty
    under this section, including court costs, reasonable attorney's
    fees, investigative costs, witness fees, and deposition expenses.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.007. DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES. A violation of
    this chapter is a false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice
    under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, and any public or private right or
    remedy prescribed by that subchapter may be used to enforce this
    chapter, except as provided by Section 46.008(d).

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.008. CIVIL LIABILITY. (a) A person injured by a
    violation of this chapter may bring an action to recover actual
    damages, including lost profits. A person who prevails in the
    action is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs.
    (b) In lieu of actual damages, a person injured by a
    violation of this chapter arising from the transmission of an
    unsolicited or commercial electronic mail message, other than an
    electronic mail service provider, may recover the lesser of:
    (1) $10 for each unlawful message; or
    (2) $25,000 for each day the unlawful message is
    received.
    (c) In lieu of actual damages, an electronic mail service
    provider injured by a violation of this chapter arising from the
    transmission of an unsolicited or commercial electronic mail
    message may recover the greater of:
    (1) $10 for each unlawful message; or
    (2) $25,000 for each day the unlawful message is
    received.
    (d) A court may not certify an action brought under this
    chapter as a class action.
    (e) At the request of a party to any action brought under
    this chapter, the court, in its discretion, may conduct a legal
    proceeding in such a manner as to protect the secrecy and security
    of the computer, computer network, computer data, computer program,
    and computer software involved to prevent a possible recurrence of
    the same or a similar act by another person and to protect any trade
    secrets of a party to the action.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.009. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL. (a) A person who
    brings an action under Section 46.008 shall give notice of the
    action to the attorney general by sending a copy of the petition by
    registered or certified mail not later than the 30th day after the
    date the petition was filed and at least 10 days before the date set
    for a hearing on the action.
    (b) The attorney general may intervene in the action by:
    (1) filing a notice of intervention with the court in
    which the action is pending; and
    (2) serving each party to the action with a copy of the
    notice of intervention.
    (c) A person who violates Subsection (a) is liable to the
    state for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $200 for each
    violation. The attorney general may bring suit to recover the civil
    penalty imposed under this subsection in the court in which the
    action is instituted.

    Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.010. BLOCKING OF COMMERCIAL ELECTRONIC MAIL
    MESSAGE. An electronic mail service provider may on its own
    initiative block the receipt or transmission through its service of
    any commercial electronic mail message that the provider reasonably
    believes is or will be sent in violation of this chapter if the
    provider:
    (1) provides a process for the prompt, good faith
    resolution of disputes related to the blocking with senders of
    commercial electronic mail messages; and
    (2) makes contact information publicly accessible on
    its Internet website for the purpose of dispute resolution.

    Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


    § 46.011. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. (a) In this section,
    "telecommunications utility" has the meaning assigned by Section
    51.002, Utilities Code.
    (b) A telecommunications utility or an electronic mail
    service provider may not be held liable under Section 46.002 or
    46.003 and is not subject to the penalties provided under this
    chapter.
    (c) A person injured by a violation of this chapter does not
    have a cause of action against a telecommunications utility or an
    electronic mail service provider under this chapter solely because
    the utility or provider:
    (1) is an intermediary between the sender, or any
    person acting on behalf of the sender, and the recipient in the
    transmission of electronic mail that violates this chapter;
    (2) provides transmission, routing, relaying,
    handling, or storing, through an automatic technical process, of an
    unsolicited commercial electronic mail message through the
    utility's or provider's computer network or facilities; or
    (3) provides telecommunications services, information
    services, or other services used in the transmission of an
    electronic mail message that violates this chapter.
    (d) An electronic mail service provider that provides for a
    dispute resolution process as described by Section 46.010 may not
    be held liable for blocking the receipt or transmission through its
    service of any commercial electronic mail message that the provider
    reasonably believes is or will be sent in violation of this chapter.
    (e) A person may not be held liable under this chapter for a
    commercial electronic mail message that is sent as a result of an
    error or accidental transmission.
    (f) A sender may not be held liable for the transmission of
    an electronic mail message that violates this chapter if the
    sender:
    (1) contracts in good faith with an electronic mail
    service provider to transmit electronic mail messages for the
    sender; and
    (2) has no reason to believe the electronic mail
    service provider will transmit any of the sender's messages in a
    manner that violates this chapter.

    Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1053, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  121. Nov 14th, 2008 @ 7:41pm

    Flag them Spamholes

    by Jeffery Markus

    Illegal it maybe, there are holes in that TOS that people have been exploting. Look at www.craigshitman.com . Flag for Hire! Social patrolling does not work anymore.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  122. Nov 22nd, 2008 @ 8:26pm

    spam /overposting

    by judy moores

    i am sick of looking for a used bedroom set and 25 out of 30 postings being from mesa mattress just by adding a # behind their name. im to the point of not using craigslist any more this is a shame that these businesses get away with this free crap of addvertisement. i dont care if they were giving away a bed i would not deal with this business ever

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  123. Nov 24th, 2008 @ 1:19pm

    Reno Craigslist Jobs - spam

    by Mike B. - Reno, NV

    Hunting for a job on Criagslist has become a nightmare trying to figure out legitimate from not. It appears that approximately 95% of ads for jobs on Craigslist are now fraudulent / phishing or frankly just scams. After reading your article I now know why. We the job seekers have been trying to police and educate other individuals with our own posts but, for some funny reason they can remove our ad, but if we try to remove the spam ad, it just sits there. LOL We are posting the following guidelines:

    This is an awesome place to find jobs however be cautious when applying for jobs
    here in regards to sending our of your personal information/resume, where the following information does not appear.

    REMEMBER, LEGITIMATE companies have nothing to hide, and display the following information proudly.

    *+* Company Name
    *+* Company Location
    *+* Company Contact Information
    *+* Specific Job Location watch for general locations like "Tahoe" "Reno/Tahoe"
    *+* Description of Job
    *+* Compensation

    ADDITIONAL THINGS TO WATCH FOR:

    +*+ Poster Requests money/cash to process application for submitting of resume
    +*+ Links in the ad takes you to another web site and...
    +*+ The Website requires one to give personal information before giving any job info
    +*+ Website does not provide a secure connection (S) in the browser address bar i.e. httpS://
    +*+ Sites that claim to be representative of a large organization like Home Depot
    +*+ Website does not contain any contact information for company or agency
    +*+ Send an email to the email link in the ad, request info, see what comes back
    +*+ Pay particular attention to regular email address, If you have questions email mail them and see what comes back, and search then in Google
    +*+ Watch for unrealistic Wages for job classification i.e. 45k for a receptionist
    +*+ Watch for unrealistic range of pay for job classification

    There are individuals and entities out there attempting to obtain our
    personal information to use it for who knows what. Only apply with reputable, verifiable, Companies, for all other tag appropriately

    A fellow Job seeker

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  124. Nov 25th, 2008 @ 10:35pm

    Re: Well

    by john

    At least i have never seen spam saying to kill someone ???never...have i seen a spammer say that. Just you who is really the jerk?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  125. Nov 25th, 2008 @ 10:40pm

    Re: Re: Token Charge is the answer

    by john

    agreed...backpage.com makes money but they let you post for a small fee....seems easier than fighting so many. If the spammer product or service is worthless....they wont pay to list, thus no spam.agreed.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  126. Nov 27th, 2008 @ 7:24am

    Re: Flag them Spamholes

    by Jeffery Markus

    Since I can't edit my post, I just wanted to point out that the craigslist flaggers website is over at craigshitmen.com , not craigshitman.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  127. Nov 30th, 2008 @ 3:31pm

    I make spam

    I would just like to comment on this a little bit seeing as how I regularly use Craigslist to generate traffic to affiliate programs.

    The truth is that there is a big difference between SPAM and SCAM.

    And not all spam is necessarily bad.

    My spam DOES fall primarily in the jobs category. However I'm not trying to obtain personal information. If a user were to follow my link, and sign up with my affiliate (by posting a resume), I make $1 and they actually get their resume submitted to the job that they applied for. (At no cost to them)

    Basically my strategy is to sign up people for websites like monster.com.

    If you browse some forums for affiliate marketers you'll see that most (but not all) marketers do things like this. There are very few people out there that are actually trying to phish your personal information.


    If your still reading let me give you one piece of advice from the "bad guys" perspective.

    If you get led to the website of a large reputable company that you recognize, go on ahead and sign up. If you never heard of the company before, do a quick Google search to see how legitimate they are. Know the difference.

    And consider this as well, how many companies that are hiring post to Craigslist? Probably a very small percentage of them. Thanks to people like me, Craigslist surfers are able to find jobs that might have otherwise never made it to CL.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  128. Dec 29th, 2008 @ 2:04pm

    Re: there is a solution

    by J dub

    CL has it coming. Even in paid categories they are all to trigger happy to blow away your ad if there is even the slightest sense that it is not in the somewhat communist spirit of CL. It's the worst form of censorship I have ever seen carried out by people who supposedly believe in free speech. And we are not talking about illegal garbage either. Meanwhile legitimate business suffers while they let prostitution thrive save for the government stepping in.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  129. Dec 30th, 2008 @ 6:58pm

    Let the marketplace rule

    by todd

    I am called a "spammer" when I want to post one ad a day in different cities promoting my home based business. I have NEVER sent anyone an email that didn't request it and I have shown many people a real way to profit from home, yet I am forced to do the things that I can do to get around CL issues and I will always be able to get around them and so will others. It's a game that is played and those of us that actually enjoy the game will find ways to post our ads. The solution is to let the marketplace rule. Let the buyer beware and sort through the ads or simply charge a fee.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  130. Dec 30th, 2008 @ 7:35pm

    Re: Craigslist loosing the battle

    by JC

    If you dont want to see all the spam go to www.informationex.com instead. The spammers have not gotten to that site as of now.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  131. Jan 5th, 2009 @ 4:24pm

    CL Auto Poster / Plimus = SCAM

    by DZ

    do not buy from these people, the software will work for a few weeks then stops. then they try to take money from you claiming that there is another vendor that is the legit owner... it's all the same company just one big scam.

    Also Pamela Martinsek at Plimus is the manager there and runs this operation; I have reported them to the FTC and will to the IC3/FBI as a fraud/scam.

    Do not waste your money.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  132. Jan 17th, 2009 @ 7:13pm

    1thru99.com

    by 1thru99.com

    True craigslist has tried to fight back etc, etc, etc,. For everyone who is tired of paying 5.00 go to 1thru99.com and advertise yourself or your services for free. Plus you need to email all adult you know and tell them that 1thru99.com willnot censor you and we support free speech... 1thru99.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  133. Feb 2nd, 2009 @ 2:26pm

    I NEED A CL Posting solution HELP

    by Need Money

    Does any CL posting solution out there still work. I still see that people are using something please help.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  134. Feb 2nd, 2009 @ 4:36pm

    Corkin.com

    by Stever

    I have been using http://www.corkin.com lately.. Its a brilliant site, that has a great way to get rid of spammers. You guys should all check it out.. I never use Craigslist anymore.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  135. Feb 6th, 2009 @ 6:47am

    I got ghosted and I'm not a spammer

    by Jim

    Yeah, this sucks. I posted 10-15 ads around the country for a nationwide service that I provide linking to my website.

    Within a few minutes my posts appeared to go live. It was a few hours later that I realized that none of the ads actually were posted, they just appeared to be.

    I think even legitimate people have to find some black hat way to get around CL's anti spam stuff. Otherwise you are limited to one post in one city (your city) and thats it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  136. Feb 7th, 2009 @ 12:51pm

    Spammers = Scammers = Scum

    by Onefedup

    Desperate people are looking for work and being misled by false job offers just to get their personal information which is used against them and/or those they know. Since I am one of those who are out of work and have been hurt by spammer/scammer/scums, I have taken up the cause of reviewing Craigs Lists Job section on a continuing basis - If I even remotely suspect stink I flag the ad and notify CL. So if your ad was flagged and removed - maybe it was me - go fuck yourself!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  137. Feb 11th, 2009 @ 5:52pm

    craigs list spammers

    by martin barnes

    I get so tired of the garbage from spammers that take my email off of craigs list. in a fit of rage and not thinking clearly I created an free email account and decided to send them their own stuff - except I sent them several hundred copied of the same thing. I figure that they want to hear from me or they wouldn't send the email address.
    So I cc'd them about 50 times in each email and sent about 5 of them. Imagine what would happen if 10 people did that to the same email address? They might find something else to do.
    I warn you: 1. DON'T OPEN THEIR EMAIL 2. DON't SEND YOUR EMAIL FROM YOU PERSONAL ACCOUNT and 3. DON'T SEND TOO MANY OR THEY WILL BE REJECTED BY THE FREE EMAIL SERVICE.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  138. Feb 19th, 2009 @ 12:41am

    Re: Well You are crazy MORONS

    Ron you want to KILL spammers? I would far rather see an extra posting than some internet pscycho killing someone...they talk about crazy people.....this guy wants to kill...compared to harmless spammers jerk.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  139. Feb 19th, 2009 @ 12:43am

    Re: You are crazy people

    People on this board are talking about killing spammers, one person said they want to drive up to a spammers house and shoot them???? Internet people are so scary, they take the slightest thing in life over the top...spammers? or Killers ...I choose spammers any day. Crazy, gods speed to normality wackos. Spammers dont drive to your house and hurt you...are you people crazy?? You are talking about killing, shooting, and the spammers are the problem...alas the downfall of mankind has become lonely obsessed internet freaks.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  140. Feb 20th, 2009 @ 10:16am

    OK how about this?

    by Michael

    Craigslist new anti spam posting strategy:

    1. You must make a simple account that uses IP address, email address, password and phone number.

    2. It will be free to post on craigslist but you must pay a deposit via Credit Card or Pay-pal (returnable if you choose to close your account) (A vaild phone number would also be required)

    3. Use of an auto-dial (like the computers use for telemarketing over the phone), to call and verify an automated captcha question sent to you when you start your account.(i.e. please say in English the verification word sent to you in your confirmation e-mail)

    4. If your message gets flagged, it isn't removed. It is only temporarily placed in a new category called (suspected spam) where users can vote, comment and the poster can defend the message if they wish. Maybe a flag could even require the auto-dialer to call and confirm the account again. (It should have an option to change your password through the automated system to keep people from stealing accounts))

    5. Repeated violations = Your deposit is taken for violation of TOS on craigslist. To re-activate your account, you must submit a satisfactory letter of explination or re-pay the deposit.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  141. Feb 22nd, 2009 @ 6:30am

    killing spammers

    by Phil

    No we aren't crazy. It's that spammers are seen as soulless individuals that do not have any care about the well being of the community at large. Really, cold heartedness is begetting cold heartedness in return.

    I do think some kind of public humiliation and/or corporal punishment would be in order.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  142. Feb 23rd, 2009 @ 4:52pm

    Craigslist just isn't creative enough!

    Did anyone ever visit "hell.com" ten years ago? What was interesting about hell.com is that every time you hit it, it acted randomly and led you to different pages and different options. Craigslist needs to apply some A.I. to this idea and make users jump through random hoops to get a posting put up. Vary the code on a page based on multiple factors such that automated agents can't parse it: no two Craigslist authentication pages are the same in code nor in appearance. Combine false CAPTCHA images with instructions in somewhat terse English that explain what CAPTCHA is the correct one to fill out. Record which methods any given IP address is most successful with, and use that information to serve up more of the unsuccessful ones to that IP, effectively poisoning the spammer's authentication method. Limit CAPTCHA authentication timing to ~30 seconds so that failure to respond fast enough results in an invalid CAPTCHA authentication, effectively rendering middleman software that presents them to human solving farms incapable of producing responses fast enough due to the latency involved in such operations. Craigslist isn't approaching this like they're dealing with humans armed with computers, they're using concrete blocking techniques like blocking IPs and phone verification types instead of thinking with their own "fuzzy logic." We know the spammers use human problem-solving agents paid a penny per solution to bypass human authentication, so we target the weak link by using their latency against them; we know that spammers tend to leave "signatures" that tip everyone off (using "Raleigh/Durham/Ch" as the "city" in the "raleigh/durham/CH" section was a dead giveaway, because no human would post such a thing for their city!) so we block those signatures. We know they automatically repost ads when we notify them that the ad is flagged or removed, so we don't notify them that the ad is gone. Perhaps we show them a listing that includes their removed ad while others don't see it.

    I just don't think Craigslist is creative enough in their filtering efforts.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  143. Mar 9th, 2009 @ 5:29pm
    by babe

    got a solution for ya

    http://neverflagged.com

    no flagging, hmm what a concept

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  144. Mar 14th, 2009 @ 1:35pm

    cut the spam

    by andy

    One thing CL can do right now is to eliminate to multiple geographic area in each category, for example, in Manhattan NYC, they have each area in the city (about 40)as a sub category, spammers can multiple listings in each sub-category that will appear in the main category. The CL system only block duplicate ads in the same category, thereby, allowing the spam to continue.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  145. Mar 29th, 2009 @ 11:47am

    A simple answer to the Beijing problem

    The Beijing spammer is a MAJOR problem.My solution involves the graphic for contact info they use to avoid text filtering.
    The properties of those graphics (width,height and byte length or even byte length alone) are unique enough for global banning or removing posts that contain them.
    This would take little time to code and even less time to collect parameters of new images.Now if only Craigslist had contact info...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  146. Mar 31st, 2009 @ 9:51pm

    Re: Re:

    by The bad guy

    God the lists of emails...think of how many addresses they can use once you respond. Craigs is a 2 way street. Even if you make a patching decision; the counter could be worse lol.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  147. Apr 4th, 2009 @ 8:06pm
    by roy

    I agree that craigslist and the spammers should work something out.. maybe craigslist could post ads for the "spammers" so that way the spammers would not have to post on craigslist but instead have their own site ad posted on craigslist with a direct link to the spammers site. although no on will purchase from the spammers ad because they are all in china....
    dunno.. maybe craigslist needs to start putting ads from other companies to generate more income to fight off spammers.

    I used to use craigslist to sell and buy all the time under electronics... but now all i see are spammers and its really sickening so I do not use craigslist anymore. too bad soo sad....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  148. Apr 4th, 2009 @ 8:18pm
    by roy

    but hey... if you have an awesome idea and know how to make a website now is your chance to overtake craigslist and make your own money:) if i knew how id do it:P

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  149. Apr 21st, 2009 @ 10:29am

    Re: A fun solution

    by Anon

    I get it. Spam the spammers! Then they will just deploy the same defenses as CL. Where does that get us. I prefer to just wipe out the scum.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  150. Apr 21st, 2009 @ 10:41am

    Re: Re: uhhh really simple solution

    by Anonie Moose

    I think the key was the word "paid" and last i knew, gmail is free.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  151. Apr 27th, 2009 @ 9:44pm

    Re: there is a solution

    by joe

    You are right on! If you just charged 10 cents it would probably get rid of most of the spam!
    These idiots on here that waste there time trying to annoy the spammers... it just don't work, if they have a system for getting spam on CL, then they have a system for dealing with annoying people!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  152. May 10th, 2009 @ 3:55pm

    CL and sites automatically replying back to posted adds with links to dating sites or other psrsonals sites

    by Martu

    How do they do this? I get replys to my postings, but I also get replies from seming individuals but the reply always contains links to age verificaton sites, or other personals web sites. The are always come from someone@gmail.com Why isn't GOOGLE doing something about this problem? It's using their serves and bandwidth.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  153. May 11th, 2009 @ 9:46am

    Search emails before reply.

    I was selling an Lap-Top on Craig's list this weekend and my ad was attacked by SPAM/Fraud, I design a website that creates a list of SPAMMERS/fraudulent email accounts, the website is: www.whoisemailingme.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  154. May 17th, 2009 @ 2:52pm

    Re: Well this man is an idiot

    by fred

    No spammer ever threatend too kill anyone in their postings...yet you say they are horrilbe? YOU write about killing people.

    What Spammer ever wrote I will kill you.

    So justified are the unjust.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  155. May 17th, 2009 @ 2:53pm

    Re:

    by fred

    No spammer ever threatend too kill anyone in their postings...yet you say they are horrilbe? YOU write about killing people.

    What Spammer ever wrote I will kill you.

    So justified are the unjust.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  156. May 17th, 2009 @ 2:56pm

    Re: Re: Well You are crazy MORONS

    by Jack

    I dont know they want to kill spammers, no spammer posts that they want to KILL them oh well who knows peace to you normal people who dont want to kill anyone so righhteous they are against spammers....ooooo over posting http://www.blowoutdiamonds.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  157. May 18th, 2009 @ 1:54pm
    by Paco

    Craigslist should not just block the effing spammers, they need to fight back. Find a way to upload viruses or some way to destroy the spammers systems or something.... I hate those damn spammers...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  158. May 19th, 2009 @ 6:20am

    regarding spam on craigslist

    by adele

    I like Craigslist, but may you should charge $1 per ad. It will be kind of a hassle, but is still pretty close to free. And maybe it will slow the spammers down.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  159. May 23rd, 2009 @ 3:31pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    I've been posting and replying to CL personal ads for like 2 years now, and out of all the replies i've gotten over the past 2 years, only 2 of them were real, one only waned to compliment my dreads, the other wasn't interested...fucked up. You know what's dumber, these automatic bots that reply and respond to emails and ads are more than likely responding to their own ads and emails, lol. Imagine that conversation.

    Replier -
    "Hey, i'm a hot and sexy girl who's so lonely and wanting you t o come over right now!"

    Ad Poster -
    "Oh my God thank you so much for replying to my ad, I'm dripping wet thinking about how much I want you. I just want to be safe and make sure you're not some crazy person, please visit this site and come find me...I'll be waiting"

    Replier -
    "Glad you're interested in me, If you go to my website you'll find way more pictures of me, and you can view my webcam too. See you soon."

    Retarded, lol

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  160. Jun 1st, 2009 @ 2:18pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    It's even more awful that you can mash F5 once every minute or so and, like clockwork, more posts will show up. "Holy shit. There's some horny ass women.. oh bots. fuck it."

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  161. Jun 11th, 2009 @ 1:52pm

    This has been hilarious reading thanks! I think the spammers are not that big a deal. It's obvious what is spam and what isn't, so really they only affect the lives of the STUPID people who are too moronic to recognize spam. Hmm...maybe I'll start spamming...is there a Spamming for Dummies book out yet?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  162. Jul 7th, 2009 @ 10:28am

    Scammer

    by Donald Courtney

    Two possible scams by the same scammer

    First possible scam (e-mal to me)
    Hello
    Thanks for your prompt reply.Am okay with the price and the condition,
    and like have said my mode of payment will be through cashier
    check,Concerning the shippment, my shipper will be at your place for
    the pickup of the item and am going to include the amount of shipping
    charges into the cashiers check am going to send to you,so when you
    have this, you will deduct the amount for your item and have the rest
    money sent to my shipper for them to come for the pick up of the item
    for me at your place..I really wish to be there to check out the item
    but i have a tight schedule i will call you as soon as the check is
    made out to u and pls stay in touch with me .
    so i will like to have the following so that the payment can be
    mailed out to you
    Full Name to be on the check
    Full contact Address ,
    your Zip Code
    phone number
    Reply me soon.
    Thanks brown

    Second possible scam
    Re: 1983 Toyota Truck - $999 (Las Vegas, NV)‏
    From: Kelvin Martins (kelvinmartins5@gmail.com)
    Sent: Tue 7/07/09 7:44 AM
    To: Donald Courtney (dondomore@hotmail.com)


    Greetings,
    Thanks for the quick response to my earlier mail.like I
    said i will like to buy the item and I will have love to come for for inspection but I am a busy type and also my business will not allow me to come for the inspection.

    I will also like you to know that i will be making the via
    check due to the distance ,I will need you to provide me with the following information for my Client facilitate the mailing of the payment.


    1.Your full name..........
    2.Your mailing / postal address(NOT P,O BOX ).....
    3.Your phone number.........


    **I will like you to know that you will not be responsible for the shipping I will have my mover come over as soon as you have receivedthe payment**

    Also I want you to know that the check will come with an excess amount, rather than the actual amount of the Stuff. So the balance will be send to my Mover (for swift & quick pick-up) once the check cleared from bank.


    NOTE: Do withdraw the advert from Craigslist


    Do understand with me that everything is OK from here, you should have the check in the next few days.


    Kindly let me know if this sound good to you, and once I confirm from you, payment will be mail out. Thanks again for your understanding,
    and I will wait to hear from you soon.

    Have a nice day.

    K. Martins

    My answer to both was:

    Dear sir:
    I am sending you this this second notice. It seems that you did not receive the first one.
    I have been advised not to accept any cashier’s checks as per the note below. Therefore I must insist on a cash payment for the truck. I do not pay shipping on my items. It is cash deal and you pick up the merchandise. I hope we can still do business. Please advise me of your intensions.
    Thank you
    Don
    distant person offers a genuine-looking (but fake) cashier's check

    you receive an email (examples below) offering to buy your item, or rent your apartment, sight unseen.
    cashier's check is offered for your sale item, as a deposit for an apartment, or for just about anything else of value.
    value of cashier's check often far exceeds your item - scammer offers to "trust" you, and asks you to wire the balance via money transfer service
    banks will often cash these fake checks AND THEN HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE WHEN THE CHECK FAILS TO CLEAR, including criminal prosecution in some cases!
    scam often involves a 3rd party (shipping agent, business associate owing buyer money, etc)

    I am in hope that your fraud division can catch this scammer and others like him.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  163. Jul 18th, 2009 @ 8:27pm

    Re: How can you promote a service or product Legally on CL?

    by mike

    dont waste your time! all you will get is spam,bots and replies offering get rich quick nonsense! i have quit using craigslist,its worthless!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  164. Jul 27th, 2009 @ 8:55am

    Re: there is a solution

    by John

    Absolutely why not just charge a FEE , to post ALL ads, if they charged what the spam companies do they would make money, cut down spam. The average person wanting to put up an ad can easily pay 40 cents for an ad...it would limit people spamming with software its just simple and makes them money.....Craigs doesnt understand that you cant broadcast on TV free, radio for free, its not something grown on a tree...so its a man made site. So stupid how they can solve the problem and have better postings and a better site by simply charging a nominal fee...plus they have operating costs to run the site so they should just go ahead and charge. Personally I would be happy to pay.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  165. Aug 19th, 2009 @ 11:55am

    Re: 99 cents per account

    by prg

    you are forgetting the app that these guys use to kick every one else off.. now everyone is a spammer and nobody can use it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  166. Aug 25th, 2009 @ 12:05am

    CL personals

    by josh

    i posted an ad looking for someone who wanted to catch a movie and got 73 and still counting fake gmail addresses that replied. The first one tricked me and it turned out to be someone promoting a webcam girl site...it's disgusting. craigslist used to be useful...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  167. Aug 25th, 2009 @ 7:03pm

    Re: Re: Token Charge is the answer

    by Dos

    Your feedback is exactly correct, I presume. Great idea....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  168. Aug 30th, 2009 @ 6:20am

    ?

    by Jason Rose

    Craigslist should adopt zerohedge dot com's strategy. You have to answer a math problem before you are allowed to post.

    for example:

    (minus six) minus (-44) equals

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  169. Aug 30th, 2009 @ 12:29pm
    by JW

    Simple solution..........make it illegal to send spam mail and if you are caught doing it, you are fined $10,000 per instance and face jail time on multiple offenses.

    But no that's wishful thinking that our government and congress would actually do something and pass a law that is really needed.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  170. Sep 2nd, 2009 @ 12:23pm

    It is not hard to stop spammers

    The MORONS that run Craig's List, refuse to use technology to regulate their site. The spammers are ripping it apart... soon people will get fed up with it.

    Many places like wired.com say criagslist gets more traffic than any other site...but the truth of the matter is that the traffic is BOT traffic, which makes it pretty irrelevant traffic.

    The hyper about this traffic is pure moronic, its BOT traffic which means it is WORTHLESS traffic and full of scams.

    Craig himself is a moronic, nerdy fool that is stuck in web0.1 backk when the web was just links and text with NO security in place at all... he REFUSES to change and hires people that clearly do not know how to stop the spam.

    The problem with Free For All's is that you WILL get spam. You can try to stop this with tracking IP addresses and cookies, but all of which can be circumvention by proxies and cookie cache flushing...

    The way google deals with Click fraud is by having a combination of computer programs, but mostly filtered by HUMANS... google can afford this because, google is a well oil company, unlike CraigsCrap(List) which does nothing to try and make the most out of potential profits.

    until Craigslist hired technologically savvy internet geeks, that know HOW to combat internet spam/fraud/bots as well as real staff filtering what the BOT's can not... craigslist is going to become nothing more than a BOTNET full of worthless BOTs and no more humans.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  171. Sep 16th, 2009 @ 10:08am

    Re: Re: 99 cents per account

    by frustrated

    I agree. It has been over a year and I still can't respond to any ads. I have been looking for a particular vehicle and found some that I was interested in. Every time I send an email it bounces back. I use a shared IP email server so I have no control over that. The bounce messages says the IP is blocked due to excessive spamming. Why don't they get software to verify the actual email and view the SPF to confirm the email is not a forgery. I wish the people would offer another option to contact them instead of the craigslist email address.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  172. Sep 17th, 2009 @ 2:48pm

    phone verify

    by the raleigh boyz

    Easy to beat...just clean your browing data cookies etc and unplug the modom reseting the IP and you are back up posting in minutes

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  173. Sep 30th, 2009 @ 8:53am

    spam/overposting

    by Ken

    Charge every post a dollar, paid in advance by credit card

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  174. Oct 1st, 2009 @ 4:10am

    There are some retarded PPL out there I guess.

    Are you joking me. Do you guys have any idea how much money is made from posting ads on craigslist? Companies and ppl a like are making 10's of thousands a day. You think that isn't the case? Good! Enjoy working that 9-5 while I relax on the beach making more then a doctor while my posting software does all the work.

    Just because some ppl are spammers doesn't make them scammers. Its just a black hat method of funneling traffic from a rich community to your business, offer, product, etc.

    Bottom line is no matter what changes are implemented its only going to make it more worth going through all the loop holes to get even better traffic with less saturation.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  175. Oct 10th, 2009 @ 6:26pm

    CLBOT PRO users

    by icon googlebotz (profile)

    These people really piss me off,they spam craigslist with their garbage and it is impossible to flag them and if you
    call them out they flag you in microseconds with their programs that are against craigslist TOU.
    The only way to get rid of these pos people is to start flagging forums in your city.It takes up to 300 people to
    flag a BOTPRO tool because of rotating proxies.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  176. Oct 10th, 2009 @ 6:26pm

    CLBOT PRO users

    by icon googlebotz (profile)

    These people really piss me off,they spam craigslist with their garbage and it is impossible to flag them and if you
    call them out they flag you in microseconds with their programs that are against craigslist TOU.
    The only way to get rid of these pos people is to start flagging forums in your city.It takes up to 300 people to
    flag a BOTPRO tool because of rotating proxies.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  177. Oct 10th, 2009 @ 6:26pm

    CLBOT PRO users

    by icon googlebotz (profile)

    These people really piss me off,they spam craigslist with their garbage and it is impossible to flag them and if you
    call them out they flag you in microseconds with their programs that are against craigslist TOU.
    The only way to get rid of these pos people is to start flagging forums in your city.It takes up to 300 people to
    flag a BOTPRO tool because of rotating proxies.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  178. Oct 18th, 2009 @ 8:01pm

    Anti-Spam Obsessives

    by icon Kaz (profile)

    The real problem is that the anti-spam measures, as noted in the article, do not work.

    What they do, as with gun prohibition, is punish the legitimate users. They've made posting, or replying, ever-more complicated, until this damned phone verification thing, which for me is the final straw.

    I hate the constant struggle to post, far more than the annoying spam.

    I've had an account on CL for years, and suddenly now THAT account has to be verified? I could see if it were a new account, but this is just absurd.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  179. Oct 27th, 2009 @ 7:20am

    Spam will break them..

    Craigslist has fallen way behind the times. Poor website, zero user support.. They (craigtslist.org and spammers) will drive all over their users away. I no longer use the site... It has been a waste of time to even try.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  180. Oct 29th, 2009 @ 10:35am

    legit autoposting

    by mike b

    i provide a service to car dealers posting their used car on CL. i have been doing this manually but now has grown to be too much. Even playing by CL rules (no dup ads within 48 hrs and one city only) can i use an autoposter?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  181. Oct 31st, 2009 @ 10:26am

    emails sent to email address never used in sign-up

    by dan

    Spammers are contacting us not through the email we opened a Craigslist account with. How did they get that email address when we never typed it? Now, instead of getting emails sent to the intended address, spam email is now coming in daily at a protected address.

    What don't spammers understand? Go after clients who want your product. What a waste of their time to go after uninsterested clients who will say no.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  182. Nov 13th, 2009 @ 5:55pm

    •spam/overposting

    In their user policy they say they will charge $100 per ad if it seen as spam.. That will stop spammers.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It