(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
itc, loophole, patents

Companies:
broadcom, nokia, qualcomm



Nokia Takes Cue From Broadcom; Uses Trade Commission Loophole To Fight Qualcomm Over Patents

from the loopholes-are-fun dept

A few months ago, we pointed out that since the Supreme Court made it clear that patent injunctions were being used too often, many companies were starting to use a loophole. Rather than just going through the courts to get an injunction, they would go to the US International Trade Commission and ask it for an injunction against those they accused of patent infringement. While courts need to follow the lead of the Supreme Court, the ITC could make whatever decision it wanted on whether or not a particular product actually did infringe and whether or not an injunction should be granted. It gives patent holders a second shot, outside of the court system, to get an injunction. In fact, right after we discussed this, Broadcom used exactly that loophole to get an injunction against certain Qualcomm chips. Qualcomm has been fighting this injunction without much luck, and it seems to have encouraged others to try the same thing. Nokia and Qualcomm have been engaged in a rather vicious patent fight recently -- and suddenly Nokia has come up with a strategy of (you guessed it) asking the ITC to ban the import of Qualcomm chips for patent infringement. Wonder where that idea came from? The folks at the ITC might want to start staffing up in the division that has to review these patent injunction requests. It sounds like there's going to be plenty to do in the near future.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Aug 20th, 2007 @ 5:45am
  • by |333173|3|_||3

    Shouldn't this be under Legal Issues?
    It seems clear to me that the ITC should not have jurisdiction over patent matters, and that these should instead be transferred entirely to the courts, where, for all the problems of the legal system, precedents must be followed and there is the chance of an appeal.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Aug 20th, 2007 @ 8:22am
    • Re:

      by Anonymous Coward

      It seems clear to me that the ITC should not have jurisdiction over patent matters,
      Unfortunately, that's not what the laws says.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Aug 20th, 2007 @ 6:26am
  • For a second there...

    by Sanguine Dream

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Aug 20th, 2007 @ 6:30am
    • Re: For a second there...(Fingerslip)

      by Sanguine Dream

      I thought this was from the here's-how-a-new-business-model-is-made-(and soon to be patented) dept.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It