RSS
With Cameraphones, Scorn Is Just A Snap Away
from the crowd-rule dept
As the internet allows for the rapid diffusion of information and easy coordination of large groups of individuals, a rise in vigilantism seems inevitable. We saw this last year when Digg users helped to drive a sleazy online photo store offline. In New York, one site has been set up exclusively to publicly shame men who expose themselves to women. The ubiquity of cameraphones helps this task immensely, as women can instantly snap pictures of offending creeps, and send them to the site. While the threat of being exposed (no pun intended) on the internet may serve as a powerful deterrent for would be flashers, there are some problems with this kind of justice. One worrisome aspect of vigilantism isn't the outcome per se, but the fact that targets of it are afforded none of the due process to which they'd be entitled under the courts. If a picture misrepresents a situation, or if a person's name is wrongly associated with a blurry photo, there's almost no way for them to get recourse. At least if a court makes a mistake the ruling can be reversed. It would seem that attacking someone's character or business online shouldn't be completely without cost should the accusations prove baseless. Furthermore, while nobody has any tolerance for flashers, what do we do with regards to other kinds of behavior that people would like to keep private. Would it be ok if a group posted pictures of anyone who entered into an adult bookstore, or, to use an example from the above article, an abortion clinic? Though these questions are complex, and raise many legal and ethical questions, much of this debate has been anticipated in discussions of sousveillance. If technology seems bound to erode privacy, then perhaps the next best situation state is one in which everyone can watch everyone else. This includes the right of individuals to watch the state, making abuses of power more difficult. Unfortunately, discussions of sousveillance seem to have an element of utopianism to them. In the real world, reputations can be unfairly destroyed, and some things are worth keeping private.
12 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Rep. Doyle Introduces Bill To Provide Public Access To Publicly Funded Research
- Beware Of Those Who Claim They're 'Saving The Culture Business' When They're Really Protecting Those Who Strip Artists Of Rights
- The Rise Of The 'Professional Amateur' And The Fall Of Gated, Exclusionary 'Clubs'
- OK Go Shows, Once Again, How Content Is Advertising... And How There Are Many Revenue Streams For Musicians
- We're Living In the Most Creative Time In History
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Good post
In a way one could look at the rise of the Internet as giving power back to the people -- groups of people now have the power to inflict justice on individuals (flashers in NYC) and businesses (camera scams). The problems occur when the mob goes too far (how much punishment is enough?) or people disagree strongly about the end result (should we "shame" abortion doctors?).
It'll be interesting to see how these issues play out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Unrelated -- way to "flag" or mark stories?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"flags"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Reminds me
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "flags"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
RE: With Cameraphones, Scorn Is Just...
Yes, good things ( woman posting pics of flashers ) and bad things ( zelots posting pics of women entering abortion clinics ) can come from people powered technology...
...but in the grand scheme of things I would rather have too much than not enough, or worse, none at all.
Also, imagine all of the things considered in this article, but replace static cameraphone generated images with the new abiltiy to broadcast live video using a mobile phone:
...ComVu has created the world's first live video broadcast solution from a mobile device to a global audience. ( more at comvu dot com )
It reminds me of the 80s tv show Max Headroom.
T
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Don't forget about men posting pictures of woman flashers: girlsgonewild.com.
Don't you love the double standard of naked men = bad, naked women = good. Granted, I'm straight so I don't go for the naked men, but objectively, why is one bad and the other good?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Because in this case the naked men are imposing themselves upon unwilling women. In the case of GGW, the men are more than willing to see the girls with low self esteem show their stuff.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Sure... lol
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment