Surprises

Surprises

by Mike Masnick




Can Direct Revenue Generate Revenue Without Being Sneaky?

from the questions-questions-questions dept

The story of adware maker Direct Revenue has been both amusing and depressing at the same time. The company, who has gone through a number of name changes (each time the negative attention was too strong, basically), claimed late last year that it had learned the error of its ways and was going to become much more "transparent". Of course, even after this announcement plenty of people were still claiming they had no idea how Direct Revenue's adware got on their computers at all. In fact, when anti-spyware researchers went and checked it out, it appeared that Direct Revenue was anything but transparent. Almost everything the company claimed was at least somewhat misleading. However, with a big lawsuit facing them down, the company is claiming (once again) that it's really (no, seriously, we mean it!) going to clean up its act this time. How, exactly? Well, by getting rid of their affiliates. It seems like the new strategy of these adware firms isn't to take responsibility for their sneaky software, but to blame affiliates. It's the same thing 180Solutions did in suing a bunch of affiliates. That gives these companies an "out" where they can claim all the bad stuff was really the fault of these affiliates. Most people believe that's not quite true -- and even if the adware firms weren't directly involved, they at least looked the other way as sneaky install procedures were put in place. At the same time, most of these adware apps have license agreements and start up wizard screens that mask the real purpose of the adware -- and that's usually not the affiliates creating those. Still, the bigger question looms: if Direct Revenue is really getting rid of their affiliate program and promising to be "more transparent" can they actually still make money? The early evidence isn't too encouraging. Either way, given Direct Revenue's promises in the past, it would seem that they really need to prove they've cleaned up their act instead of just telling everyone they have.

Leave a Comment..

 
 

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It