Canada has had a long tradition of charging extra fees on recordable media, as a way of "subsidizing" the potential for losses to the entertainment industry. There are, of course, a number of problems with this (including the somewhat obvious question wondering if you're paying that subsidy, does that then give you the right to copy unauthorized files?), but it's why blank CDs and such tend to be more expensive up north. Two years ago, the government extended that fee to mp3 players, but a court later struck that down after retailers (and Apple) complained. The Canadian Supreme Court has refused to hear the case, meaning that iPods and other such music devices won't be taxed for such potential losses any more. Of course, the recording industry is upset, but in their typically clueless way: "Obviously we're disappointed. We felt it was self-evident that those products are sold for the purpose of copying music." Someone want to let them know that these players aren't for copying music, but for listening to music.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Feds Insist It Must Be Kept Secret Whether Or Not Plaintiff In No Fly List Trial Is Actually On The No Fly List
- Documents Show LA Sheriff's Department Hired Thieves, Statutory Rapists And Bad Cops
- Unarmed Man Charged With Assault Because NYC Police Shot At Him And Hit Random Pedestrians
- Judge In No Fly Case Explains To DOJ That It Can't Claim Publicly Released Info Is Secret
- German Court Says CEO Of Open Source Company Liable For 'Illegal' Functions Submitted By Community