Wireless

Wireless

by Mike Masnick


Print



Naked Women And Wireless Security

from the illegal-search? dept

Yes, I'm a bit worried about what kind of people will find this post via Google in a few days, but... It appears that mobile phone security is suddenly getting a lot more attention -- and for some reason, it's got a lot to do with naked women. First, there was the whole Paris Hilton incident, where her naked camera phone photos were spread all over the internet due to weak server security from Danger and T-Mobile, and now comes the amazingly bizarre story of two cops who arrested a woman for drunk driving and then downloaded her naked camera phone photos to a PDA. No one seems to want to explain why a drunk driving arrest would involve checking out the photos on someone's phone. Then again, this case has a number of oddities, including the fact that the cop's partner later called the woman to ask her for a date. However, as the article points out, the cops might not have done anything illegal -- and someone even claims that this is no different than if someone had lost their wallet and it had nude photos inside. Except that doesn't seem quite right. This wasn't a case where the woman lost her phone. This was a situation where the cop clearly took it and then actively went through it, apparently looking for photos. That seems to go beyond the standard investigative technique needed to judge whether or not a driver is sober. Either way, it appears that pictures of naked women are suddenly driving forward the important discussion on increasing wireless security. People always said that porn leads the way towards technology innovation, but they probably didn't mean this way.

27 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Dirty Cops stealing wireless phone pictures

    by Notonmywatch - Mar 26th, 2005 @ 8:14am

    Just another case of out of control cops. This has nothing att all to do with wireless phone security, although if one would password their data that woiuld help. The cops are crooked bums plain and simple. If you take a bum from the streets and give him a badge and the right to carry a gun, well he is still a bum but, now has a gun. I wounder how many other crooked deeds these two leeches have accomplished.
    I think nude photos should be posted of them on the internet. This way they can see how many phone call dates from BUBBA in prison they can get and compare notes.
    Just my 2c

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Encryption Software

    by August Jackson - Mar 26th, 2005 @ 3:47pm

    It seems to be that an additional element of the software installed on camera phones that might be a good idea is some kind of encryption based on a personal password. That way even if you lose your phone (or someone takes it) the picture files will not be viewable either on the phone or as files transferred to other devices.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. No Subject Given

    by Jon - Mar 27th, 2005 @ 11:27am

    illegal search

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. add a PIN

    by nonuser - Mar 27th, 2005 @ 1:53pm

    end of problem

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: No Subject Given

    by Oliver Wendell Jones - Mar 28th, 2005 @ 7:05am

    illegal search

    Sure, but that just means they can't use it as evidence at trial

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Re: additional remedies

    by Rick Colosimo - Mar 28th, 2005 @ 8:20am

    Actually, the exclusionary rule is just the most common remedy for a 4th amendment violation. Section 1983 (42 U.S. 1983 for those who care) offers remedies for violations of constitutional rights by state actors, and the 5th Amendment provides similar protection re: federal actors.

    Beyond the exclusion of any evidence gained from the search/seizure, the woman would have a civil action against the officers (certainly in their official capacity and perhaps in their individual capacities) as well as against the relevant jurisdictions and intermediate agencies.

    In fact, this alternate recovery for violations of constitutional rights is the primary backup/rationale behind the arguments for eliminating the exclusionary rule. It focuses on the idea that if you are actually guilty, most of the rationale for the criminal procedure rights and processes we've created goes out the window, leaving only the raw "we don't want the government doing this stuff" argument. The camp that dislikes the exclusionary rule believes that these other remedies are a better mechanism for redressing wrongs than letting people who are factually guilty run free.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. fdsa

    by woohoo - Apr 9th, 2005 @ 5:55pm

    urrr teh second one on google search fer naked wemon!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Re: fdsa

    by Anonymous Coward - Apr 22nd, 2005 @ 4:51am

    can i fuck you

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Re: fdsa

    by Anonymous Coward - Apr 25th, 2005 @ 11:53am

    if your pretty

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. Re: fdsa

    by christian see - Apr 28th, 2005 @ 6:34am

    yes u can sexy lady

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Re: Dirty Cops stealing wireless phone pictures

    by christian see - May 6th, 2005 @ 5:43am

    lets have somen fuck

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Re: No Subject Givenukyfky

    by dylan - May 11th, 2005 @ 7:30pm

    frktggggluiulll

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. Re: fdsa

    by Ur mum - May 17th, 2005 @ 6:41am

    i had sex with your mum

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. Re: add a PIN

    by nihkil - May 19th, 2005 @ 6:09am

    can i fuck u

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. Re: fdsa

    by chris - May 19th, 2005 @ 6:11am

    yes u can

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. Re: fdsa

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 25th, 2005 @ 8:25am

    no you cant

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. hey baby

    by quinton brown - May 4th, 2007 @ 7:39am

    hey baby how are you doing are you feeling well and call me at 1-334-295-9604 or 1-334-295-4231 yeah baby i love you .

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. jfdvghgh

    by asdf - Jul 30th, 2007 @ 10:51am

    i love everything beautifull

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. Re: Re: add a PIN

    by Anonymous Coward - Aug 7th, 2007 @ 9:40am

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  20. LIAR

    by GEORGE W BUSH - Aug 16th, 2007 @ 9:10pm

    YOU KNOW I JUST FUCKED PARIS HILTON INSIDE THE JAIL

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  21. Re: Re: fdsa

    by bill - Mar 29th, 2008 @ 1:14pm

    are you a woman?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  22. Re: Re: fdsa

    by bill - Mar 29th, 2008 @ 1:15pm

    sure.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  23. Re: Re: fdsa

    by bill - Mar 29th, 2008 @ 1:19pm

    yes! call me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  24. Re: fdsa

    by bill - Mar 29th, 2008 @ 1:21pm

    yes! call me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  25. Re: Re: fdsa

    by bill - Mar 29th, 2008 @ 1:22pm

    phone number

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  26. Re: Dirty Cops stealing wireless phone pictures

    by mike - Apr 24th, 2008 @ 9:35am

    Well once a person is placed under arrest cops can automatically search your vehicle, your person, you are no longer under any protection. I don't really see them flipping through her phone that much different then digging around her seats looking for drugs.. but I still don't like cops and their ethics, or lack thereof it should have stopped at them seeing the pictures, the point where they decide to copy them, now that seems like a crime, if not a civil digital intellectual property right violation.

    just my 2 cents

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  27. sex

    by tyler - May 31st, 2008 @ 4:41am

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It