RSS
House Passes Bill Saying No To Stock Option Expensing
from the no-big-deal dept
As expected, the House today passed the bill saying FASB can't force companies to expense options, instead saying they should follow the plan suggested two years ago by Craig Barrett, that only top execs have their options expensed. The bill still has to make it through the Senate (and the President, of course), which may be difficult. This still seems like a lot of talk over nothing. It doesn't involve any cash movement, just the shifting around of numbers on a piece of paper -- and the most important part of those numbers is already known. Anyone who really needs to know this information already knows it. The only thing this might change is the perception of some people who haven't been paying attention concerning the profitability of a company.
3 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- SEC Told Pandora To Be More Explicit In Its IPO That Its Business Is Likely Unsustainable Due To Crazy Licensing Rates
- The Fine Line Between Crowdfunding & An Illegal Securities Offering Part II: SEC Fines Ad Execs Over Pabst Stunt
- As Pandora Goes Public, How Come No One Is Pointing Out That It Misled The Press About Being Profitable?
- Don't Try To Make Sense Of LinkedIn Share Price
- DailyDirt: Start-up Pitches And Strikeouts...
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It Just Might Pass
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It Just Might Pass
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It Just Might Pass
the competitive nature of jobs in the Valley
What Jobs ????????[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment