Customers Angry Over Enterprise Software

from the yeah,-couldn't-have-guessed-that-one dept

If you've been involved in the buying or selling of enterprise software, you're likely aware that much of it is something of a scam. The prices are quite flexible, and the "real" costs show up much later, when people realize that (a) the product doesn't really work the way they wanted it to (b) it needs ridiculous amounts of expensive customization, maintenance and training and (c) the vendor is always breathing down their neck to pay for an "upgrade" and service contract. As it stands, the incentives for the vendors are to make the initial price seem low, but to make sure the actual software doesn't work very well. It appears that customers are starting to catch on and increasingly angry about standard practices in enterprise software. They're also (finally!) threatening to stop playing into the system and changing their buying habits. They're training their own people to support the system, they're renegotiating maintenance contracts and they're switching to "more accommodating" vendors. Clearly, there's room for companies to come in with much more reasonable offerings. In some cases, I imagine this is going to take the form of ASP or hosted offerings, but those are still limited depending on what the customer needs. It could make sense for a company to pull a PR move and start advertising much more transparent pricing plans to better attract customers who feel more comfortable knowing what they're really paying for.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Angry over Enterprise software...

    identicon
    Tracy Vierra, Feb 11th, 2004 @ 11:26pm

    Well just get Cisco Enterprise products adn software and you will be amazed!!

    Thanks!!

    tracyv

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    pricing models

    identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, Feb 12th, 2004 @ 7:47am

    The argument has been made (sorry, I don't have a link) that over the long term most of the cost of software development is in ongoing work (fixing bugs and adding new features) rather than the initial development, and therefore it makes sense for the pricing model to reflect this. In addition, if an enterprise customer pays a relatively small amount for the initial purchase and then they decide they don't like the product, they haven't lost as much.

    The article you linked to is unavailable now (the server is refusing connections) so I don't know whether it mentions these points.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This