Video Game Nominated For Award, But Too Graphic To Show
from the so...-why-nominate? dept
Why would you nominate a video game for a design award if you believed that it was too graphic to show at a museum exhibiting the nominees? You would think that if they believed the game was that graphic and a problem to show, that it wouldn't be deserving of a nomination. It's somewhat indicative of the standard censorship double standard, where someone decides that, while they've survived (with no ill effets) seeing something "awful", it's their job to prevent others from seeing what they've seen.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Cybersecurity Bill Backers Insist This Isn't SOPA... But Is It Needed?
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work





Add Your Comment