A Potential Compromise On The Stock Option Reporting Question

from the tossing-out-ideas dept

A popular topic in Silicon Valley these days is the question of whether or not stock options should be expensed. The arguments on both sides can be convincing. Now, Intel's Craig Barrett has come out suggesting a middle-ground compromise. He says that the the stock options granted to the top 5 execs in any company should be expensed, but the options of everyone else shouldn't be. This way, the largest stock options grants are costly, but rank-and-file workers are not effected. It seems like an interesting compromise, but doesn't do much for the argument of presenting more accurate financial statements.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    A slight modification

    identicon
    ghjm, May 23rd, 2002 @ 2:14pm

    How about expensing stock option grants to anyone who already holds 5% or more of the company's stock? It achieves essentially the same effect but it's a class of people that the SEC already tracks, so it might be easier to implement...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    No Subject Given

    identicon
    hgx, Jun 14th, 2003 @ 9:16am

    jffhgff

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This