Who asked for evidence for what? There is not a single shred of real, science based evidence that support the official story. All crime scenes were cleaned and removed BEFORE investigations started. That is evidence in itself. There were 86 cameras in the direct environment of the Pentagon. FBI took all the tapes within the hours after impact. The very few frames that were released only after great legal pressure, don't show us a Boeing. On the contrary: it shows that there was no Boeing involved! A pilot was asked by air traffic control to fly over the Pentagon to have a look. He said: there is lot of smoke, but I don't see any remains of a large plain. This is recored on official tapes and therefor are official evidence.
People, just believe your own eyes and common sense. There is not ANY piece of hard evidence which confirms the official story. There IS evidence that the official story is not correct.
If the 'terrorism' argument will be busted, you can bet on it that a new false flag operation will be constructed (and probably is underway allready, because US gov is loosing credibilty rapidly).
We should not ask ourselves 'who did it'. We should just ask 'what happened'.
You, American people, have to insist for a new investigation. It is the government who should come up with sound evidence that scientifically supports their story, instead of using Hollywood methods of putting fraudulent frames and stories into our heads.
The truth is staring at us. The wounds will never heal if you keep ignoring it.
I am not sure if I understand your remark. Maybe I was unclear: WTC Building 7 fell down in its own footprint later that day. No plane hit this one, as we all know. The official explanation comes from NIST (and not from me!!) claiming that WTC7 went down due to regular office fires. What do you think? WTC7 housed offices of the CIA, FBI and the NY Police. WTC7 is the smoking gun. Doesn't smell good...
Go away? You are funny. Please do me a favor: take a look at that video. Even NIST couldn't explain why these buildings went down almost at free fall. Simple facts and rules of nature, my friend. And they don't add up. The truth is staring at us but is too dark to handle. So don't be naive: this IS the discussion, and you don't want to face it. Don't you see what is really at stake? Power, control, money. Terrorism is a false flag.
Thanks for looking. There is no speculation in this video, sorry too say. Based on scientific and professional testimonies it shows that the official version doesn't explain what happened: - symmetric free fall in own footprint? (impossible with regular office fires) - explosives found in the dust and metal pieces? (NIST never looked at explosives because they didn't expect them to find them) What????? - 100rds of first responders who report explosions (completely ignored by 9/11 commission and not mentioned in the official report) What??????
This IS the evidence which is being ignored. You do the same and that is the reason why all those lies and false flags by your government and their allies are kept being used to expand power and control through mass surveillance.
Your response is the exactly why a new investigation is needed.
These are my final comments on this topic. All the best, God Bless America...
ad 41: My anonymous friend, your are right. We should remember that 'terrorism' as a global enemy is invented and created by the CIA as early as the 80's. Even the term Al Qaeda is invented by the CIA. Five of the so called 9/11 hijackers were trained by the CIA and put on the CIA's Al Qaeda list, and send to Bosnia (Balkan, Europe) to heat up the fight and to discredit the muslims over there. And it worked: soon the US came with their fighters.
If we want to get rid of these unjustified claims of terrorism, we should get rid of all the open questions regarding 9/11 and find out how those 3 buildings really came down.
Look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
Al-Qaeda is invented by the CIA in the 80's and started just as a list of people. The so called hijackers of 9/11 were broad into the US by the CIA through a rogue visa office in Jemen.
Btw: do you remember mr Atta? They say he flew into one the WTC Towers. The towers went down due to extreme heat and impact: concrete was pulverized, metal was molten, everything went into dust and ash (despite the fact that the kerosine was largely burned outside the building within a few minutes as you can see on all the footage), and also the plain was completely vanished. They couldn't even find any hard evidence anymore to determine which plan it actually was. The impact was so big that the lower 80 stores, which were completely in tact, all collapsed almost in free fall, as if now construction was in between to resist. They fel symetrically into their own footprint. BUT NOW THE GOOD NEWS: in this gigantic pile of glowing, burning, boiling dust and molten metal they found the paper passport of Mr. Atta! Amazing achievement, don't you think? There were also more than 500 first responders who heared large and many explosions in basements, starecases, all over the place. But NIST and the 9/11 Commission found those not relevant. Why would they: they had the passport of Mr Atta, so the problem was solved. Hahah, big joke! Unbelievable that citizens and lawmakers of the US (and the rest of the world!) are taking this crap. We need a REAL investigation - ae911truth -
The 3rd building (WTC7) wasn't even hit by a plane.
This issue needs to be cleaned up. ALL US CITIZENS MUST DEMAND FOR A NEW INVESTIGATION. I have the feeling that Snowden is going to come up with some evidence....
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Thom.
Re: Re: Response to: Thom on Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 1:43pm
agree
Re: Re: Re: Re:
No doubt, false flag operations are as old as humanity. You know that so don't be surprised.
And here you can read what is actually behind all this:
http://www.newsofinterest.tv/video_pages_flash/politics/misc_neocon_globalist/wolfowitz_pnac_nph.php
How clear can it get? Here another one from 2002:
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/nc-pilger.html
Who asked for evidence for what? There is not a single shred of real, science based evidence that support the official story. All crime scenes were cleaned and removed BEFORE investigations started. That is evidence in itself. There were 86 cameras in the direct environment of the Pentagon. FBI took all the tapes within the hours after impact. The very few frames that were released only after great legal pressure, don't show us a Boeing. On the contrary: it shows that there was no Boeing involved! A pilot was asked by air traffic control to fly over the Pentagon to have a look. He said: there is lot of smoke, but I don't see any remains of a large plain. This is recored on official tapes and therefor are official evidence.
People, just believe your own eyes and common sense. There is not ANY piece of hard evidence which confirms the official story. There IS evidence that the official story is not correct.
If the 'terrorism' argument will be busted, you can bet on it that a new false flag operation will be constructed (and probably is underway allready, because US gov is loosing credibilty rapidly).
We should not ask ourselves 'who did it'. We should just ask 'what happened'.
You, American people, have to insist for a new investigation. It is the government who should come up with sound evidence that scientifically supports their story, instead of using Hollywood methods of putting fraudulent frames and stories into our heads.
The truth is staring at us. The wounds will never heal if you keep ignoring it.
Re: Response to: Thom on Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 1:43pm
I am not sure if I understand your remark. Maybe I was unclear: WTC Building 7 fell down in its own footprint later that day. No plane hit this one, as we all know. The official explanation comes from NIST (and not from me!!) claiming that WTC7 went down due to regular office fires. What do you think? WTC7 housed offices of the CIA, FBI and the NY Police. WTC7 is the smoking gun. Doesn't smell good...
Re: There goes this discussion...
Go away? You are funny. Please do me a favor: take a look at that video. Even NIST couldn't explain why these buildings went down almost at free fall. Simple facts and rules of nature, my friend. And they don't add up. The truth is staring at us but is too dark to handle. So don't be naive: this IS the discussion, and you don't want to face it. Don't you see what is really at stake? Power, control, money. Terrorism is a false flag.
Thanks for looking. There is no speculation in this video, sorry too say. Based on scientific and professional testimonies it shows that the official version doesn't explain what happened:
- symmetric free fall in own footprint? (impossible with regular office fires)
- explosives found in the dust and metal pieces? (NIST never looked at explosives because they didn't expect them to find them) What?????
- 100rds of first responders who report explosions (completely ignored by 9/11 commission and not mentioned in the official report) What??????
This IS the evidence which is being ignored. You do the same and that is the reason why all those lies and false flags by your government and their allies are kept being used to expand power and control through mass surveillance.
Your response is the exactly why a new investigation is needed.
These are my final comments on this topic. All the best, God Bless America...
Just look at the video first and tell what you think. Rules of nature...
ad 41: My anonymous friend, your are right. We should remember that 'terrorism' as a global enemy is invented and created by the CIA as early as the 80's. Even the term Al Qaeda is invented by the CIA. Five of the so called 9/11 hijackers were trained by the CIA and put on the CIA's Al Qaeda list, and send to Bosnia (Balkan, Europe) to heat up the fight and to discredit the muslims over there. And it worked: soon the US came with their fighters.
If we want to get rid of these unjustified claims of terrorism, we should get rid of all the open questions regarding 9/11 and find out how those 3 buildings really came down.
Look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
Re: Re: you know what the bad thing is?
Al-Qaeda is invented by the CIA in the 80's and started just as a list of people. The so called hijackers of 9/11 were broad into the US by the CIA through a rogue visa office in Jemen.
Btw: do you remember mr Atta? They say he flew into one the WTC Towers. The towers went down due to extreme heat and impact: concrete was pulverized, metal was molten, everything went into dust and ash (despite the fact that the kerosine was largely burned outside the building within a few minutes as you can see on all the footage), and also the plain was completely vanished. They couldn't even find any hard evidence anymore to determine which plan it actually was. The impact was so big that the lower 80 stores, which were completely in tact, all collapsed almost in free fall, as if now construction was in between to resist. They fel symetrically into their own footprint. BUT NOW THE GOOD NEWS: in this gigantic pile of glowing, burning, boiling dust and molten metal they found the paper passport of Mr. Atta! Amazing achievement, don't you think? There were also more than 500 first responders who heared large and many explosions in basements, starecases, all over the place. But NIST and the 9/11 Commission found those not relevant. Why would they: they had the passport of Mr Atta, so the problem was solved. Hahah, big joke! Unbelievable that citizens and lawmakers of the US (and the rest of the world!) are taking this crap. We need a REAL investigation - ae911truth -
Re:
Agree, the evidence is clear overwhelming:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
The 3rd building (WTC7) wasn't even hit by a plane.
This issue needs to be cleaned up. ALL US CITIZENS MUST DEMAND FOR A NEW INVESTIGATION. I have the feeling that Snowden is going to come up with some evidence....