Don't construe this as disagreeing with you. I detest asset forfeiture as it currently exists:
Due process doesn't really apply to civil cases, and these forfeitures are run under the civil banner, unless it's beneficial to call it criminal, then it's schroedinger's case of sorts.
Half of this mess could be resolved by not permitting these to be civil proceedings in the first place.
Re: Re:
Don't construe this as disagreeing with you. I detest asset forfeiture as it currently exists:
Due process doesn't really apply to civil cases, and these forfeitures are run under the civil banner, unless it's beneficial to call it criminal, then it's schroedinger's case of sorts.
Half of this mess could be resolved by not permitting these to be civil proceedings in the first place.
I can certainly echo on the price increase BS.
161/mo prior to merge without promos.
Now 192/mo with nothing else changed...
Froth at the mouth first, check facts later I guess...
Even with fixed wireless, would Google not have to at least run the backhaul?
Granted that should be far less work, but the reasoning here still seems a tad off