Even if your assertion that it's that easy to determine which torrents are infringing were conceded, you somehow seem to have missed that the posts in question were a) not original to torrent-finder, but derived from other sites, likely through RSS feed, and b) more importantly, not torrents or even links to torrents, but articles and blog posts, i.e., reportage and speech. Ergo, not damning at all, if the putative charge is infringement through bittorrent. Or, if they *are* 'damning', then the New York Times needs to be taken down whenever they post an article to their site about the use of bittorrent, too.
"And ofcourse, if you think that is all they will do again, you would be sadly mistaken.. If that material becomes available and publically available from other sources, I bet they can expect to be closed down as well... "
So, you think they will block or close the sites for the New York Times and the Guardian as well? Doubtful.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by vitruvian.