I'm not too sure why Timothy Geigner needed to state - more than once - his disagreement with the funny.
Maybe his -- "But do we want the financial system running some general check against common terror groups and references to make sure money isn't falling into their hands? Of course" -- general comfortableness with Big Brother watching our every word makes him a little more likely to watch his every word.
Milorad Trkulja is "not a gangster", he just happens to show up the vicinity of gangsters? Meaning - "during google"?
"Mills Oakley is a rapidly growing Australian commercial law firm, resourced by over 75 partners and more than 500 staff across offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Canberra and Perth" and they are known to hire "lawyers" with the name "Stuart Gibson"?
Did you know that Mills Oakley just reported "2014 was a milestone year for Mills Oakley, marking the firms 150th anniversary "?
Did I get everything? Milorad Trkulja, Stuart Gibson, Mills Oakley, google, gangsters? But not a gangster-Milorad Trkulja?
"according to the FCC's own data, the majority of Americans who can purchase 25 Mbps choose not to."
According to my own data, the majority of Americans who can purchase gold plated Senators choose not to. Furthermore, according to my data, the majority of Americans who could purchase a cable package for $300/month choose not to.
I have to admit that many of my comments have gone down the memory hole. Usually sites like The Intercept, FireDogLake or Red State delete me because of touchy moderators/operators . . . These guys just seem like they are cheap.
But c'mon. Fake names and Facebook are like peanut butter and jelly. Do they really expect that to work any better?
You went to that "Watching Adams" webpage - why didn't you keep on reading? Lazy?
"If anyone made a direct threat to the campus or individuals on campus, then I hardly think that a persona non grata status would keep them away. Persona non grata is weak in regards to preventing violence towards the school. If Danny has made direct threats of violence like you claim, why is he not in jail? If you were truly interested in protecting our safety, you would use all of the legal tools available to prevent it. If Danny had made a direct threat against anyone, then he would have been arrested. Why is there no legal case against him? Why have you not been able to procure evidence of these "threats" that he has made? Furthermore, I am not sure how one can "imply" a threat. Tell us all exactly what threats were made and why a hastily implemented institutional policy was used to address it. "
ASU Police Department revises mission Posted on 05/04/2015
"Under the direction of new Chief of ASU Police, Paul Grohowski, the department has revised its mission statement:
“The mission of the men and women of the Adams State University Police Department is to mentor and guide the choices of tomorrow’s leaders by establishing community partnerships with our campus staff and students by providing proactive police and customer-related services aimed at crime reduction and the protection of life and property. “"
He's just proactively adjusting the Constitution. Ya know, cop stuff.
I know that here in San Jose the cops are just lazy and will tell you to your face they are not going to do shit until the city council gives them more money.
The only crimes they will "investigate" will be ones that have bodily injuries. NO blood no help. They, in all intents and purposes, are encouraging criminals so that they can get their %90 pensions and overstaffed department back.