+1 for Fish.
It's supposed to be for commercial infringement, not personal use...
So again I ask, WTF do they think they are going to accomplish?
+1 for jquery mobile, and +100 for the effort!! thx!
+1 for being an honest AC:
Your issue is with the very existence of the DMCA, which, if I may, you want abolished and/or changed. Your logic is tortured, but at least honest.
The same cannot be said about the *AA's with whom you have thrown in your lot, what with their public lies about "protecting corn farmers", "protecting jobs", "protecting artists", "protecting America", etc etc.
Clueless and stuck in a previous century, but honest.
This I thought was the best thing Louis said on Reddit. Shows an intuitiveness that all of Hollywood lacks:
oh one other thing before i go. i did read what that uploader wrote and i will say it was funny to me because he seems or is acting like he's in terrible pain when he does it. he's having a crisis of concious and just... oh man i'm so sorry but I have to do this!" but the crazy thing is, if it's at all bothering him, why is he doing it?? he's sharing it, not taking it. Well, if you look at the page, it's because he's promoting his own stuff and using my project as an attractor. that's happening on youtube also. So i'm learning that SOME pirating is caused by people piggybacking their own product on another. interesting.
There's a bigger issue here than the puny little Masnicks of the world will never understand: protecting America's Creatives.
The RIAA is perhaps the most selfless organization known in late Western Civilization, as evidenced by its willingness to fall on its sword to defend the hard-working artists of this great nation.
And getting into bed with Righthaven (unprotected mid you) qualifies as much as any act imaginable as hari-kari, or falling on your sword.
You're either down with suicide or down with death, either way they're going down protecting the artists who work hard every day.
(Really not too bad for my first mock rant imho. Any critiques, improvements?)
I don't like being bullshitted
It is presumptuous to state whether a site is 'willfully' engaging in infringement. What if said site's activities are perfectly legal in it's home country? What do? Freak out and cut off their payment systems globally?
Speaking of freaking out, who doesn't believe that MPAA member companies won't claim that every single presentation they make to the ITC demands 'expedited' treatment? Hello DMCA abuse geometrically multiplied.
Thirdly, who believes that even the sages w/ ITC can tell the difference between the bittorrent file-transfer protocol and a static server in Uzbeckistan? Not this voter.
I'm thankful for this effort, but highly suspect of it's positioning.
+1 for shell commands on techdirt!
OKAY, experts, then tell us the /right/ way to fight piracy
From the article:
The proposed changes to the law would effectively repeal the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
While SOPA may go overboard, it has nothing to do with, say, suppressing unpopular political opinions, unless those opinions happen to be conveyed in a manner that infringes some copyright or trademark right.
At least you're honest: "break the internet, that's my goal".
A true free market includes respect for BOTH commercial opportunities for a creator AND the benefit and interests of the voting public. It however does NOT guarantee a return on a creators investment.
The current privatization of copyright law ignores the latter half of that equation.
Any half decent CMS (I run several full disclosure) keeps a record of the IP address, author name and URl (if provided) for every comment posted. Typically in a MySQL database. And that's just the beginning.
Actually, running an operation like this carries some fairly heavy responsibilities on the owner in terms of privacy and respect therefore.
Doesn't matter though as speech is not illegal, and "I ripped a DVD" is too vague to pursue.
Most people who rely on the film industry to make their livings are in favor of PROTECT IP.
Second, the issue of piracy today isn't the determined few, it's the masses with easy access.
Making it harder to pirate in public rips down huge amounts of infrastructure, makes P2P pretty much passe,...
But until now, no one has stepped back and looked at this phenomenon as whole, placing it in a historical and legal context, or tried to analyze how it is related to the battles for the future shape of the Internet currently taking place
the internet doesn't forget, but the internet isn't paying them :(.
.brazenpoliticalstatement {
truethat: Despite the inchoate-ness of youth, #OWS is calling out the regulatory capture of our governing institutions (both private and public governance). Support these kids and vote with them.
}
Use The Telephone
As in, if you're horrified by this legislation, call your Senators and leave a message.
Being from Vermont, home to the embarrassing author Senator Leahy, I just called Senator Sanders and left this very polite message with the receptionist:
Dirt simple and very effective use of 3 minutes of your time. No need to explain anything in-depth, hold your rage at bay, just be friendly and short. At the end of the day, the office head will swing by and ask the receptionist for any tallies.
(oh, and amend for your state of course)