Beale now has 45 reviews in Google, 43 of which are 1-star reviews. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Dr.+Mark+D.+Beale,+MD/@32.7862915,-79.9832517,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x88fe7bc12bb4e605:0x13b716d73fc6efff!8m2!3d32.786287!4d-79.981063?hl=en-US
XKCD raised one of your points re: encryption: https://xkcd.com/538/
Me, I think the more likely possibility is that an encrypted camera would have a close encounter with an axe. A solid swings and neither the camera nor the storage media will be usable.
I've read your sources, and you have zero evidence to back up the claim that "US Refuses To Ratify Because Publishers Association Hates Any User Rights"
"Very confused, because obtaining an image from a site that complies with the DMCA doesn't suddenly make those images royalty-free, free to use in commerce, or even non-infringing themselves. "
This is true, but if I found an image uploaded to Flickr with the appropriate CC license how am I supposed to know it is pirated?
And how do you know they didn't try to make sure the image was legal to use?
Beale now has 45 reviews in Google, 43 of which are 1-star reviews.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Dr.+Mark+D.+Beale,+MD/@32.7862915,-79.9832517,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x88fe7bc12bb4e605:0x13b716d73fc6efff!8m2!3d32.786287!4d-79.981063?hl=en-US
That worked well.
So basically this means I can nuke accounts belonging to the Red Cross, political campaigns, charities, and my enemies - just by mentioning Syria?
DOS attacks should not be that easy. It's no fun anymore.
So basically this means I can nuke accounts belonging to the Red Cross, political campaigns, charities, and my enemies - just by mentioning Syria?
DOS attacks should not be that easy. It's no fun anymore.
"If you die, I'll follow you to the bowels of Hell"
I have no interest in visiting your neighborhood, James.
Re: Re: Re:
fairy dust.
Boom, solved.
Re: Re: Mr Camera, meet Mr Axe
Agreed, the attacker would be just as happy to keep you from having the data by destroying it.
Mr Camera, meet Mr Axe
XKCD raised one of your points re: encryption:
https://xkcd.com/538/
Me, I think the more likely possibility is that an encrypted camera would have a close encounter with an axe. A solid swings and neither the camera nor the storage media will be usable.
Re: Here is an idea...
I don't see the problem with that; the FCC website is quite usable.
obscurity
If the thumb drive was secure so long as the cops couldn't find it, does this prove that security through obscurity actually works?
I don't know why you paid it any attention.
This is an unsigned editorial, which basically means that this piece was decreed by Rupert Murdoch or some other high muckety-muck at Newscorp.
It's not an editorial so much as it is a position paper, and should be regarded as such. (The same goes for previous unsigned editorials.)
I just new someone was going to use last week's attack to climb up on their SOPA box.
this is not the blackout you are looking for
"Ok, so what do we make of this?"
Maybe they just wanted to sell ads:
"pretty much every major play in an NFL game yesterday was posted almost immediately to the league’s Twitter account, often with preroll ads attached"
But I thought you hated takedown notiues?
silence
So basically I could silence all Gawker sites simply by writing a bot which threatened a lawsuit over each and every post?
That's scary.
P.S. It occurs to me that I wouldn't even need to code a bot; I think I could pull this off using only IFTTT.
Some people use either IFTTT or dlvr.it to auto-tweet links. There are also WP plugins.
Me, I prefer to tweet the links with a bookmarklet.
???
"the Copyright Officer had filed a really bizarre and legally dubious comment with the FCC"
Suddenly the arbitrary Youtube ContentID enforcement makes a lot more sense.
"You have the right to remain silent, and should you choose not to exercise that right we will exercise it for you.
Clickbait
I've read your sources, and you have zero evidence to back up the claim that "US Refuses To Ratify Because Publishers Association Hates Any User Rights"
Swing and a miss, Mike.
I would dispute your claim that everything created by the President while in office is in the public domain. (what if he wrote a novel?)
But yes, this is clearly a gov't-created document.
Re: Squint
Agreed.
I read the original text and I think that both Masnick and Band are reading too much into it.
"Very confused, because obtaining an image from a site that complies with the DMCA doesn't suddenly make those images royalty-free, free to use in commerce, or even non-infringing themselves. "
This is true, but if I found an image uploaded to Flickr with the appropriate CC license how am I supposed to know it is pirated?
And how do you know they didn't try to make sure the image was legal to use?