Manabi’s Techdirt Profile


About Manabi

Manabi’s Comments comment rss

  • Oct 13th, 2017 @ 4:52pm


    The article did mention that police estimate the actual users was in the tens of thousands, which sounds about right given the graphs showing numbers of posts and number of images shared. But the media will mostly run with the million accounts thing and not include that little factoid.

  • Sep 28th, 2017 @ 5:32pm

    Re: Re: Only first episode was aired on TV

    Nah, CBS has been pretty open that they view *Star Trek Discovery* as a gateway drug for their streaming service. They did it that way to try to drive as many signups as possible, and it sounds like it worked. (Although the fact they refused to provide any actual numbers means we should view their claims skeptically. If they had truly massive numbers of signups, they would announce the number.)

  • Sep 28th, 2017 @ 5:29pm

    Re: Only first episode was aired on TV

    It wasn't just in the California area, but everywhere. They aired half the pilot episode, loaded it down with an absolutely obscene amount of commercials, and pushed HARD to get everyone to go signup for CBS All Access to watch the second half. The only reason they did it this way was to try to drive many signups for their streaming service. That much worked, time will tell how many people continue past the free trial.

    I'm with you, we have Netflix, Amazon Prime, and pay for cable TV. I will not pay for another streaming service to watch one series. Especially one that I don't think I'm going to like based on the half the pilot I got to see.

  • Sep 28th, 2017 @ 5:09pm

    It's actually not about copyright or trademark

    More info came out a few days later, it's not about the game mode, it's because Epic Games also provides the game engine for PUBG.

    But there’s another issue that’s potentially at the heart of this conflict: Bluehole’s fear that Epic could be making engine improvements that benefit Fortnite which won’t be shared with the PUBG team. Seeing as the two companies are now competitions, this could be a problem.

    “We’re going to get some technical support [from Epic], and we’re going to work with them to make sure Unreal Engine better supports battle royale gameplay which requires 100 people in one session, and now we’re starting to have concerns that they’re going to develop new features or improve something in the engine to support that battle royale gameplay, and then use it for their own game mode,” the executive elaborated.

    The other side of this is that any improvements made by Bluehole internally to Unreal Engine 4 could leak out, benefiting other studios. Bluehole is also not happy with Fortnite using the PUBG name in promo material, with Epic developers citing PUBG as inspiration for Fortnite’s mode.

    “It was in their promotional video that was posted on Twitter and they would openly mention that they were fans of PUBG, we wanted to make this battle royale game mode, and that kind of gave the impression that we were officially involved in this,” he added. “[Sic] there were players like, ‘Oh it’s cool, now we get to play PUBG in Fortnite’, and there was nothing we could do about it, because it was depicted that we were officially involved.”

    Bluehole's main concern seems to be that Epic is going to screw them over with the game engine now. And their secondary concern is that they felt like Epic was making it seem that that Bluehole was officially involved in Epic's battle royale mode in Fortnight.

  • Aug 19th, 2017 @ 8:40pm

    Re: I member....

    I was working at a Wal-mart in the electronics department shortly before that transition really picked up steam. So many people would come in looking for a single for a song they wanted, only for us to have to tell them that they could only get it if they bought the whole CD. Very, very few of them opted to buy the CD. The general response was, "Well, I'll just go pirate it then." The record labels may have kept profits up a bit longer with that strategy, but it was always going to fail. People knew they were being ripped off and were sick of it. Same thing is happening now with cable TV. People know they're getting ripped off and they're sick of it. It's just a matter of when, not if, the current model collapses.

  • Jun 27th, 2017 @ 9:14pm

    Re: Re: Don't forget the YouTube strike system.

    Your link got lost, I think this is the one you wanted to link:

    As of that video, she'd taken down 42 videos, and attempted to take down a further 30. In a later video from the same person, she'd also DMCA'd Twitch streamers.

    The later video also mentions that some Youtubers are seeing strikes counterclaimed without their taking any actions. So it may be that Imagos and/or Google is working to resolve this situation.

  • Jun 16th, 2017 @ 5:47pm

    Re: Idiots...

    That's exactly what they think. The idea is that growing consumption of media on smartphones and tablets via cellular connections will lead to more overages, thus increasing revenue. And if all the major telcos have limited plans with overage fees, consumers would have nowhere to flee to. Thus ensuring they stay and pay the overage fees.

    No one said Wall Street was nice.

  • Jun 1st, 2017 @ 10:40am


    I believe this is the source article, I Googled some of the quotes to dig it up.

  • Jun 1st, 2017 @ 10:37am

    Re: Re: Re: Follow Common Sense Colorado

    That's not entirely correct. Most states allow for consensual sex among minors within a certain age range (three years is common). So the law recognizes that kids can consent *with other kids*. Just not with adults. Rape can, and is, charged for non-consensual sex between minors, even if they're inside that age range.

  • Mar 27th, 2017 @ 4:33pm


    Unfortunately no, as then there'd have been multiple deaths: one (or more cops), Scott, and his girlfriend. She would have been killed in the hail of bullets unleashed when the cops all opened fire into the home.

    The actual takeaway is: pray that a cop doesn't come to your door in the middle of the night, so that you may live to see tomorrow.

  • Feb 14th, 2017 @ 6:18pm


    Sort of. If the tower you're connected to is congested, then your packets get lower priority and you will see slower speeds. But if it's not congested, the lower priority doesn't mean much and you'll still get fast speeds. It's a much fairer way to do things than a straight slow lane.

  • Feb 7th, 2017 @ 3:21pm

    This is extremely easy to avoid

    This is easy avoid, just don't play ANY media in Windows Media Player. Get VLC instead, there's a portable version too so you don't even have to install it. Open the file in that and this fails.

  • Jan 24th, 2017 @ 7:09pm

    Re: Presidential Authority

    They're part of the executive branch, so he does have the authority to do so. However, he will have trouble if he tries to fire people. In general, civil service employees at or below the pay level of GS-15 cannot be fired on a presidential whim. Those above that pay level can be and are political appointees. People at GS-15 are senior employees who know how the system works and have access to information before their politically appointed bosses do. Combine that with the gag order and leaks of "censored" information will probably become quite common. (Censored here referring to information that Trump's administration tries to prevent being published.)

  • Jan 24th, 2017 @ 6:46pm

    Re: Re: Re: Hm

    It'd be hilarious if that was how the PTO interpreted it, and businesses started raising holy hell because they couldn't get any new patents or trademarks. Especially ones with huge sway with congress like the pharmaceutical companies.

  • Jan 21st, 2017 @ 10:14pm

    Re: That is a red plus sign.

    It's a Greek cross and is one of the earliest forms of Christian crosses. You may not be familiar with it, but it's definitely a cross.

  • Jan 11th, 2017 @ 3:18pm

    Re: Do you have a specific donation page to fund your defense?

    They don't have one yet, but it may be coming soon. From the next to last paragraph:

    At some point soon, we may set up a dedicated legal defense fund.

  • Jan 9th, 2017 @ 1:55pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Works for me...

    I think you missed the part in this case where the image found was in slack space. That means the GS employee had to run forensics software to find the image at all. This particular case goes way, way beyond someone digging through your files when you bring a computer in. This employee was hunting for stuff that wasn't even accessible from the file system. (In this case it was most likely a deleted picture, or something that ended up in slack space from web browsing. However malware could have put it there as well. There's probably no way to prove how it go there, so there's likely no actual case. Thus why the FBI didn't inform the judge of this fact when getting a warrant. Otherwise the warrant would have been denied.)

  • Jan 9th, 2017 @ 1:16pm

    Re: Re: Head, meet desk

    They can defend the bad cops legally without a PR offensive on their behalf. Just refuse to give statements, provide lawyers that provide the cop a vigorous defense and they've done their job just fine. I don't think anyone would complain about that, unions are there to defend their members. And they could, and probably should, do this in all cases.

    The problem is the PR offensive that the unions go on, attacking anyone, everyone and everything in defense of the bad cops. They do far, far more damage to the police than any of the bad cops in the process. People understand there's going to be bad actors that slip through the hiring process in any organization, but they don't expect the union to go out there claiming reality isn't reality in defense of the bad cops. That just tells people the union does not have a problem with bad cops, not that they defend all their members. And so, people stop trusting any cops.

  • Dec 28th, 2016 @ 3:16pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Probably most accurate is: Police departments only care about themselves.

  • Dec 15th, 2016 @ 2:16pm

    I'm pretty sure the GOP will move quickly, not subtly

    Frankly, I'm pretty sure the GOP will move quickly to dismantle net neutrality and neuter the FCC. They have done this before historically, and all signs are that many of the party leaders are eager to overplay their hand again. They gain control and they think they have a mandate for the worst of their ideas (such as Ryan wanting to destroy Social Security and Medicare), then get slapped down by the voters.

    Now some GOP in congress, particularly the senate, are more sane and will block congressional efforts from getting passed. (Notably, GOP senators have already said they won't support Ryan's plans to destroy Social Security and Medicare. And congress as a whole is still largely terrified of provoking another backlash like SOPA did.) But the Republicans in the FCC will probably go bonkers and push their agenda quickly, hoping no one will notice. It's going to take another SOPA-style backlash to reign it in, and even then I won't be remotely surprised if Trump just throws a Twitter hissy fit and refuses to back down. Congress is beholden to the reality of needing votes for reelection. Trump doesn't seem to have a very firm relationship with reality at all. I can easily see him thinking he'll get reelected no matter what he does, because in his world he's always right.

More comments from Manabi >>