I quit buying Ubisoft games because their Uplay system is a horrible tacked on piece of bloatware with almost no user benefits for all the overhead and if it's crashing it won't let you play the game you bought on Steam. Then there was the Microsoft "Games for Windows" program that added itself as another layer of frustration since it wasn't tied to a specific brand. I had one of the Batman Arkham games on Steam that had the MS Games for Windows DRM tacked onto it. When I had the gall to update to windows 8 I couldn't play any of the games locked down for "Games for Windows" because they didn't have a driver for Windows 8 because MS had abandoned the program. About a year later it was re-released on steam as a Game of the Year edition and they had ripped out Games For Windows DRM and offered it free as a replacement to those of us who hadn't been able to play it for nearly two years. I've avoided EA's ORIGIN service because I'm so fed up with janky DRM I just didn't want to have to jump through another set of hoops for another company. I pick up a lot of older games off of GoG, but their selection is pretty small and specific. Still I usually check there first before going elsewhere to purchase a game.
I used to work at a school district doing IT across multiple schools. We had a couple new copiers I had installed over the summer in the staff media room. Within the first couple of days of the school year the machines were giving an error code and wouldn't print or scan, even after turning them off and on again they would still show the code and not allow any of it's functions to work. A staff member had called the company (there was a sticker on the machine with the local business's phone number) and the company had already been out 3 times and was now saying they were going to charge a $100 a pop to come out and "fix" the machine. This was when I was finally informed of the issue. I went out to the school wrote down the code and looked it up via google. The first few pages of results had similar stories and basically the code that locked down the copier was because a teacher had been scanning dollar bills with their face taped to the middle of it for some class activity which teachers have done since they had access to copy machines. Now the machines saw the dollar bill and considered it potential counterfitting attempt and would lock the machine down until a tech would show up and clear the code with PIN number. Luckily one of the posts I found while searching through google also had the clear code (PIN) posted. So I just wrote up a quick explanation with the clear PIN and taped it to the wall behind the copier. Thanks DRM, because I'm sure that crappy 300dpi black and white copy machine has the potential to crank out real looking currency that has been scanned into it.
...having been a geek that enjoys building his own custom computers and tinkers with Arduino's (almost got my 3D Reprap Prusa built) and Raspberry Pi's there's a lot of hurdles they're going to need to be able to jump to make this happen. Things like bus speed that increases significantly for every new chip generation or standards for how it all connects so 3rd party devices can be used too. With all the advancements we've had in the past decade with making digital sensors smaller and smaller I see the potential for these kinds of modular phones to be potentially portable x-ray scanners or blood test kits. If you have decent storage and powerful chip in your hand things like spectrometers and such could become cheap enough for citizen scientists to use. The potential is huge, but it all depends on the implementation. I sure hope Google's ATAP can pull it off because the potential is staggering.
It's like standing up to a bully and their response is "Well, I was going to play nice finally and do all these great things for you, but you just had to go and stand up to me and tell me how much of a lying jerk I've been all these years, such a shame... I always wanted to be your friend. Now all I want to do is take your lunch and kick you in the balls, now gimmie 'yer wallet!".
I've been trying to unlock my iPhone 4s from AT&T. I got the phone new a little over 3 years ago so it's been off contract for about 13 months now. I tried the web page found under their support section of the website for unlocking a phone. It asks for your IMEI number and email and then says you'll get a response back in 48 hours normally. I got this response back...
Thank you for contacting AT&T Customer Care about unlocking your AT&T Mobile device.
We cannot complete your request because this account has reached the maximum number of unlock requests allowed during a given period. If you have questions, please review the AT&T Mobile Device Unlock eligibility requirements by going to this link, att.com/deviceunlock.
Thank you for your business. For other questions about our AT&T wireless service or Mobile devices, please visit att.com.
Sincerely, The AT&T Customer Care Team =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I have never requested a phone be unlocked that was on my account and the only other phone on my account is my girlfriends Galaxy S4, but my name is the one on the account and as far as I'm aware I'm the only one with access to my account. So I called their help line and spent some time on the phone with a support specialist that didn't see any reason for me to be concerned about my account already having the maximum number of phone unlocks having already been reached and she said they contract the phone unlocking through another company and have no way of seeing what phones had already been unlocked using my account. She said she'd forward it onto someone else and I'd get an email back in a couple of days letting me know if AT&T would unlock my out of contract phone. So I have a sneaking suspicion that they just decline everyone regardless of if you're on contract or not, if you're on contract they'll use that as the argument. If you're off contract they'll say you've used all your phone unlocks and do their best to have you run in circles until you just give up.
If this was the article I'm thinking of on Hack-a-day I think they also mentioned that the boards were very expensive to purchase, but could be built for about $20. I not sure what should be considered more criminal the hacking or the insane mark up on $20 worth of hardware. I'm not sure if I condone that kind of hacking or not, but I sure as hell understand why people do it.
Can i go to a library, look through their microfiche of public documents or old newspapers and if I were to find something referring to me that I don't like could I demand they cut out that part of the microfiche so no one else will see it? If it's considered public knowledge that could be read from a court, state or federal institution or newspaper. Maybe I'm missing some of the subtleties of this law, but it seems ripe for abuse and nearly impossible to implement. What if I can find it still on the internet achieves or the way, way back machine?
Maybe I'm just different, but the type of delivery of the message that they're dead doesn't really matter to me. I really don't see a huge difference between some stranger texting you this versus calling you or having some stranger on your doorstep letting you know. In the end they're all strangers telling you that someone you care about is dead. So you acknowledge what they said and then once they're gone you kind of fall apart into a slumped over, sobbing, heaving mess. I'm in my thirty's now and have gotten quite a few emails, facebook messages and late night phone calls notifying me that someone I cared about at some point in my life had passed away and unless it was someone I was close to informing me of this I could really care less what form the message takes to get to me.
With as many companies and businesses on the internet, I don't think one range of businesses(media MPAA/RIAA)should be able to control the internet. The obvious solution is to have all failing businesses part of a consortium that dictates how the internet works.
This week on extreme security state apologists, how to demonize someone who made your department look like an overreaching power hungry monster that likes to crap all over the constitution... after the break we have Martha Stewart on showing us all how to tie a hang mans noose and add some red ribbons to keep the bureaucratic lynching festive during this time of year.
I read it the same way and all I could think is wow... i sure hope I'm never DP'ed by legal council... does not sound like a good time, lets hope he doesn't up the threat to legal DVDA.
Also, if this guy has sooOOooo much money why wouldn't he have a lawyer on retainer that could write out these threats in a way that look legit instead of the angry ramblings of another clueless internet bully trying to sound big in an email to get people to back down and do as they will without any actual legal merit?
Just curious if they ever said what might of flagged the page as being under their license that would give them the 'right' to take it down?
One other question, on a DMCA takedown does it require they point out the link/image/video/text that was the basis of the takedown or can they just say you had something of ours on your site and that's enough....
...call in Micheal Bay to help them dream up ridiculous scenarios of hacking causing fireballs to erupt from the internet killing "literally" trillions of internet users.
This reminds me so much of the overhyped doomsday scenerio's of Y2k where the people yelling loudest about it were coincidentally the same ones offering the expensive(lucrative?)solutions to a more or less non-problem that programmers had been quietly fixing for nearly a decade beforehand. It's like someone Netflixed Die Hard 2 and couldn't fall asleep afterward, what if they hack all the planes!