The "brother-in-law" clause?
Why not just invoke the "government gets the best price on commercial items" rule used by the Feds today in other areas?
I've always wondered why the cable companies aren't paid by the content provider for the carriage rather than vice versa as now. After all if the content provider broadcasts its product it has paid the govt for the bandwidth.
In the future NO POOL to draw upon make it a per person fine: in this case, fine is $125 per person for ALL WHO WERE EFFECTED. 147,000,000 * $125 = $18.375 Billion
The current AT&T is nothing more than a re-named Cellular One, not the Bell system of your memory. And if you remember Cellular One wasn't the the fastest bit on the cell network either. The current "Cellular One" was the left-overs no-one wanted.
This is Walgreens https://goo.gl/mhJHYr
This is Nats https://goo.gl/x4G2qG
You gotta be kidding with the block W being close !!!
Let requester petition the EU court because you'll only consider an "erasure" if it comes from the court -- they passed the "law" let them enforce it. And if you get one, block the requester, i.e. forget them !
Too bad we can't tape the crude, rude, and down-right MEAN mouth of our Prez. He's now expanded his meanness from Puerto Rico hurricane, to the Dreamers, onto the 17 year Salvadorian refugees, and now to "half" of the world. Guess his PR for his "base" was running low.
... or in this case, are mostly totally ignorant, will do a "Streisand" (big time).
... should have the same answer as Google's problem of removing "forget mes"
and that is if a court decree or govt law "requires" such the court or govt should provide not just parameters but the EXACT account BY NAME or EXACT POST by URL in writing signed by THE JUDGE or an govt official.
... for their detailed order on each and every request.
Oh yes, the charge idea is also great.
Might as well save the $$$ to pay the court awards
Same arguement AT&T (when it was Ma Bell, not the re-tred Cellular One) used about 3rd party Phone book covers -- calls wouldn't go thru, THE network would collapse, dogs and cats would live together.
Remember the Ma Bell and MCI. You couldn't put a cover on you AT&T provided phone book and that was the only phone book.
BTW today's AT&T is just a new name for that wonderfully remembered Cellular One.
Why is Comcast allowed to buy media providers and be a carrier? Very conflict of interest, very.
This belongs to the "you can't make this stuff up" file.
I've always wondering why the cable transport company (Cable) pays the content "generator" (CG) and not the other way around since the CG gets an audience they wouldn't otherwise have, and they (CG) gets the increased ad revenue.
Does CBS still exist? When did they last have content anyone watched?
Horseshoes, hand grenades, and sometimes dancing. The latter is what Verizon is doing and getting well paid for it.
They and Comcast the rest of this gang are more like a Yugo.
You can't make this stuff up !