The most straight forward policy would be to allow VPNs but require they be from the same region as the billing address.
I haven't had to deal with Comcast directly, so I don't know if they include the first box gratis, but around here they charge $13 for the extras.
Yes I did. By minimum would mean one SD STB or a cable modem with an ethernet port I can either plug in to directly or connect to my own router.
I suggest a rule that the "minimal necessary hardware" for a service be included in the base fee for that service. In regards to cable services that would mean a set top box or basic modem.
Maybe Netflix should just make their VPN policy be "You I must match the region of your billing address.
Interfering with the flight of a Comercial aircraft is a felony.
As I understand it ITARs only applies to the import and export not the domestic sale of these items.
You expect researchers are going to be willing to forgo getting credit for their papers?
Your right ContentID does need to be separate from the paid music. However, there is something that would prevent me from signing up.
"5) The contract lasts for 5 years."
In today's fluid music scene, a multi year contract for electronic distribution is crazy. Even Amazon doesn't require more than three months exclusivity for KDP Select (which includes the Kindle Lending Library and Kindle Unlimited.)
My brother in law is a NYC Puerto Rican and his family Christmas meal is a slow cooked pulled pork roast, with rice, salad, empanadas, and baked ziti. most of those I don't think are weird but the baked ziti through me.
My understanding is that Netflix doesn't have a Canadian office or employes. They also don't have servers in Canada.
They do have a .ca website that contains the content they have Canadian licences for. However, claiming because they have a .ca website the CRTC has jurisdiction over them is like claiming Tuvalu has jurisdiction over Twitch.tv.
I was visiting some family and we were watching Jeopardy. In the credits they gave kleargear.com a photo credit. I just about fell off the couch.
Since they brought a suit and she says she has a license, if she produces the license could she counter sue for attorneys fees?
Can't agree more. The original article being referenced absolutely reads as a pro Hachette hatchet job.
The key to Orion was to think BIG
Do you even know the meaning of "public domain" or its relationship to works created by US federal employees or officers?
As to paying a fee to receive a copy of the work in the public domain. It is a regular practice to charge a nominal fee to make copies of public records. I don't think anyone would mind paying for high quality images or videos.
Personally I think the company should not both get paid to digitize and make the works available while charging for access to the works.
Channels that actually pay for a license to use music are being hit by this. Here is an explination from Docm77 http://youtu.be/dNaLY_2_Uzc
This reminds me of when the Curiosity rover landed on Mars and NASA's videos got flagged because a news network put one of their broadcasts into the Content ID system.
Make sure everybody knows what happened.
The event organizers should prominently post notices around the event explaining the legal fight. And make announcements over the PA system about why they can't use lightsaber.