This whole ruling is a dystopian hell-scape, but something humorous struck me: IF Elon Musk does eventually own Twitter, he would not be able to remove tweets critical of him or his company. Union organization could happen in the open, posts of his cars driving over people cutouts, etc. Mind you, It will be much better for SCOTUS to smack down the 5th Circuit for this utter stupidity.
"I am with dpartment of IRS. You owe taxes. Pay USD$4239 in Amazon gift card to..."
report spam
delete
block sender
Lawyers using dictionary definitions in bumptious defamation threats should be considered "literal feces".
I would think FyreTV would have a better case against Fyre Festival, TBH.
Fuck Roane! And fuck QI in general and totality!
Personally, I'd be FOR banning autoplay, especially ads. Penalty should be dragging and quartering for the perpetrators.
At least here in California, it is illegal to drive with headphones. You may want to change the wording away from "do your daily commute".
.... in other news .... it takes 4 months for a vehicle put on the 'hot list' to be 'found' by police. :rollseyes:
Speaking as a cancer survivor, I cannot say strongly enough ... F**K THAT GUY AND ALL SNAKE-OIL CHARLATANS!
Not only should this be thrown out, but he should have to pay for every Google lawyer, executive, secretary, and mailboy that dealt with this! Also, he should have to pay for every judge, clerk, and bailiff that got near this 'suit'!
People like him do real harm to the vulnerable cancer patients desperate, or ignorant, enough to buy into it.
May he rot in whatever hell he believes in.
Blockquote Defendants’ unauthorized access of a protected computer has caused damage and is continuing to cause damage to Southwest, including loss arising from the cost of responding to and investigating Defendants’ unauthorized access, which has amounted in an aggregated loss of at least $5,000 during a one-year period.
If the site only launched November (2 months ago), how can they have a one-year aggregated loss?
Also, how is this any different that TripIt Pro, that checks for lower fares?
As a cancer survivor (Stage 3 colorectal), currently in chemo, these 'natruopaths' prey on people's vulnerability and steal money from them. I've been through radiation and 2x surgeries, I'm on my way to being able to live the rest of my natural (pun intended) life. Sadly, I fear many of the victims will not.
To be fair to Apple, many (most? all?) of their customers act like drug addicts at every hardware release.
I was gonna guess Arby's, but that works! :thumbsup:
As may be. I was not referring to the TOS, but to ADT's response on Twitter.
Tim specifically calls out ADT's explanation/apology (and linked to the tweet with the graphic) then did a blockquote of that explanation/apology. The blockquote does not correctly quote what ADT said. It's minor, I know, but what's in Tim's article is not correct.
In the last blockquote, it references 'ADT.com'. However, the actual explanation/apology references 'myADT.com'.
“His first tweet to me was that he was a defense attorney and worked with mentally challenged people,” explained Kweli.
Well, JLVD is representing himself, so the math checks out!
""net neutrality" should apple to edge companies"
Is 'apple' a new verb, or should that be 'apply'? ;-)
This looks like a simple (ha!) CYA by United.
How many times, in the past, has a SDCC traveler claimed that priceless comics were stolen from their checked luggage? I don't know, but I'm a cynic that believes the number is large enough, and the dollar amounts large enough, for United to BAN comics from checked luggage themselves. The added twist, is that United is blaming TSA for it instead of saying "we're tired of paying out for (likely) false loss claims."
Day One
So, they must have done a speed-read of The Constitution, right? Right?!