Law enforcement officers, on the other hand, are often treated as unimpeachably credible, even when their recollections of events are less than accurate
The one time that I served a jury they filled the courtroom beyond capacity and people were standing. The judge asked a couple questions at the start to start seeing who could be dismissed. After each question a couple people left. When he said that police officers would testify and said if anybody has a problem believing an officer's testimony they should not be on the jury, almost half of the people in the room stood up and left. In retrospect I think the judge may have had that statement a bit reversed.
What makes this interesting is that recently I have begun to rethink my use of techdirt as a way to quench my thirst for naughty pictures. I may be a bit premature in reconsidering the way I use techdirty.
(Also, I hope my choice of words here does not get you into any more trouble. I tried as best I could to make this the least saucy post possible.)
So, the state got stung by someone being overly aggressive with a copyright club, and the response is that they need more copyright clubs rather than less. Is there any question about bad things whose answer is not to increase the amount of bad things? Part of me wonders how the human race managed to take over the world, but this kind of reasoning is probably why. That whole "one way trip to Mars" thing is looking better every day. With my luck, once I got there someone would have copyrighted potato DNA and trade marked the word "air."
So in the same way I’d argue we legalize drugs, why not have a careful, legal pathway to break into a phone?
The logic seems to be that drugs are now illegal, but their use only impacts the person taking them. If we can change the law so that drugs are now legal and are about personal responsibility we can take enough drugs that we no longer care. About anything. Including logic or other people.
If I were a stock holder in Netflix I would not be too pleased to hear this dialog. It sounds like an explicit acknowledgement, that Netflix does not have a firm understanding of its customers. On the other hand, as a Netflix subscriber I am actually quite thrilled that Netflix does not have a complete understanding of who I am other than my viewing choices. I certainly wish google had the same outlook on its customers.
If ESPN is forced to disclose financial entanglements between what it broadcasts and the sports it covers then there would not be much time left for sports. ESPN has provided some good reporting, but it falls far short of the other broadcasting efforts. The success of ESPN is closely entwined with the sports it covers. They have a vested interest in making sports and players look good.
Since Rogers took over Hockey Night the show has been shedding viewers. It will soon move to only cable, and the combination of the falling popularity of Hockey Night and the move to a la carte pricing should make for an interesting combination. Rogers already streams hockey, so they are going to have to make a decision about the future.
Just noticed that this site automatically directs to an https URL. Perhaps I should be notifying Senator McConnell about this travesty. Is it any wonder that the terrorists who run this site are so adamant about keeping their encryption? If you have nothing to hide then you should be doing everything neckid, in your front yard in full view of your neighbors.
As I started to read the entry I was planning on posting a smart alec remark about how this might be the impetus to bring the process of maintaining the no-fly list one step closer to being a responsible activity. Then I got to the end about how some folks would rather just use the fact that it is not responsibly maintained as an excuse not to do anything. (And I mean not do anything.) Now I just want to rock back and forth and whimper. Government disfunction has become the norm to strive for and not just the expected result.
Sure, some of you are going to complain that it is not the government's purpose to play school marm and tell everybody where everybody has been. You negative nellies need to look on the positive side. This will create an immense incentive for people to use mass transit or to use bicycles for commuting. (And also to leave cell phones at home or have them tracked as well. And also learn how to wear hoodies around public cameras.) If this can lead to cities with better bike lanes and better bus systems then this is a win for everybody!
Also, I just like to know where everybody has been because I am a humongous busybody. But, that is another story....
One day some of these people are going to retire and spend a little time with their grandchildren. When that happens they are going to be shocked to watch the kids playing with tablets and playing around with apps, interactive websites, and videos on the web. I only wish I could be there when they dirty their diapers as they realize the advantages of spending more time with actual human beings when they were younger and in charge of a large corporation. Whatever ghouls are feeding them the information that the execs want to hear will be laughing as they go to their bank's website and count the money instead of watching their televisions.
In the context of sports this is not that different from broadcast television. If you try to watch a football game all you get is an endless loop of the two different commercials trying to sell the two different kinds of erectile dysfunction drugs. As far as I can tell the primary audience for football is aging men who are so senile that they need to be reminded to buy their boner pills every four minutes. Then again, these are the same people who like to spend their time on the beach lounging in a tub.