Remember that as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Wyden is given far more information and access than the public and even the rest of Congress, so he already knows a lot more than we do, but he has classification restrictions and non-disclosure agreements that he has to follow.
Therefore, sometimes all he can do is drop hints to point us (that are paying attention anyway) in the right direction. Just because he's not being more aggressive, doesn’t mean he's playing it soft, he may not have a choice in the matter. After all, if he breaks those rules, then he looses his position & access (and possibly even goes to jail)... Then nobody is there to try and shine a light into those dark little corners that the intelligence community likes to hide in.
Big Brother Cheezit doubleplusgood leaderwise.
Unproceed malreported thoughtcrime.
Bonus points for the Monty Python and the Holy Grail reference!
Considering that the sign started out belonging to a sugar company and then 'White Stag', the whole thing seems ridiculous... (and I live in Portland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Stag_sign
There is a reason that I (and others) refer to the MPAA & RIAA (and other similarly idiotic industry associations) collectively as 'The MAFIAA', and it's due in part to bullshit like this!
It's not the definition of malware that's at issue it's the definition of DRM.
Malware: software that is intended to damage or disable computers and computer systems.
DRM is software that is intended to (unnecessarily) disable features on your computer. Therfore DRM = Malware.
"Department of Ironic Pluralized, Stylized & Handy Initialisms and Terminology."
Dammit, I'm at work, making me laugh so hard I cry is causing my co-workers to look at me funny...
LOL
D.I.P.S.H.I.T.
ROFLMAO
...
I can't stop laughing...
Not every answer is The Second Amendment, however this IS one of the primary purposes of The Second Amendment (to prevent tyranny).
The Supreme Court explained (In D.C. vs. Heller) that in order to keep the nation free (?security of a free state?), then the people need arms (ie. Guns {even lots of guns and/or big guns with lots of ammo}) to defend themselves.Any Questions?
The Court states that the Founders noted "that history showed that the way tyrants had eliminated a militia consisting of all the able bodied men was not by banning the militia but simply by taking away the people?s arms, enabling a select militia or standing army to suppress political opponents".
At the time of the Constitution's ratification, there was real fear that government could become oppressive: ?during the 1788 ratification debates, the fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through a standing army or select militia (eg. The National Guard) was pervasive". The response to that concern was to codify the individual citizens' right to arms in the Constitution.
TL;DR
/facepalm
South Carolina needs to impeach that moron! Epic Fail...
Hey Moron...
1) Those are 6,198 comments (at the time I am writing this) not posts, you idiot. Although I am sure he is equally proud of his 321 posts (as in Articles Written).In conclusion: OotB, please grow a brain (and gain sapience), or leave.
2) He STILL uses (and is, I imagine, proud of) the name "Dark Helmet"
3) I doubt he wants to erase anything; he, unlike you, shows signs of intelligence in his writing.
... metal versions of (and apparently inspired by) Whiskey Stones
FYI
It appears that http://pterodactyl.me is defunct.