I had a friend get a ticket for flashing his high beams as a warning of a speed trap. They gave him a ticket for flashing his high beams at night.
He fought the ticket by mail by sending in a copy of the LA Times weather report showing sunset and sunset times on the day of the ticket to show that it was not at night. The police are just pissed and they use clearly bogus charges, that recipients never check or fight, just pay.
I would think it would be a good time for one of the following lawsuits: 1. Against the use of the ALPRs in general as a privacy violation; 2. Having someone get a ticket for using something that interferes with the ALPR so that there would be standing.
The supreme court ruled that using a GPS mounted on a car is invasion of privacy and the violation of the 4th amendment, this is not a far leap.
At least he didn't demand you remove the information under his right to be forgotten under EU law.
That worked so well for other people. I believe in one case that an Court ruled that while the original information must be removed, there is nothing that stops you from publishing about the request to be removed.
The quoted portion from Riley v. California is interesting. The minute by minute tracking of movement by monitoring a license plate which we are required to carry on our vehicles could be considered almost as invasive as location data of a device that we carry on our persons.
Internet Brands ("IB") knew about the pair doing this. We know they knew about this because IB sued (or countersued) the Wait brothers for not giving them notice of what what going on with Flanders and Callum (the rapists) before the purchase.
IB is hurt here by judicial estoppel, as it claims it was harmed by the failure to warn and now it is being sued for failure to warn.
I saw the historical documents about the prisoners of war in Stalag 13 who despite being prisoners, went out and committed acts of sabotage. If prisoners of war can go out and commit sabotage, why can't someone in prison commit crimes?
A settlement agreement is a settlement agreement. Unless, there is fraud in the inducement of the agreement, then it is over.
Typically in a settlement agreement, there are recitations that both side believe they are correct, but they are settling to avoid additional costs, AND that they waive all claims, known and unknown against each other.
Contact Hooters, Playboy, Penthouse, Playgirl for the applications of men/women who did not quite make it. Give them the same training that the TSA agents currently have (an hour?). Let them do the pat downs.
Never mind, the complaints might increase because the pad downs where not thorough enough.