Anon E. Mous’s Techdirt Profile


About Anon E. Mous

Anon E. Mous’s Comments comment rss

  • Aug 18th, 2016 @ 5:13am

    (untitled comment)

    One has to wonder if when purchasing a Stingray from Harris Corp that a non disclosure agreement is always part of the sales agreement no matter what.

    So if the RCMP and other Law Enforcement agencies in Canada are using Stingray devices in investigations, why is it that no defense counsel or media have never heard of their use in any cases?

    I would suffice to guess that if Canadian Law Enforcement agencies are using Stingray's in criminal investigations that the use of Stingray is not being disclosed to defense counsel.

    There have a ton of cases in the U.S. where Law Enforcement agencies have not disclosed the use of a Stingray, and the reasoning was it was never disclosed until found out.

    IMHO it would safe to assume that if Canadian Law Enforcement agencies are using Stingray devices that they as well are not disclosing that fact or have convinced Judges to seal the record of a Stingray being used.

    The fact that no Canadian criminal trial lawyers associations have come out publicly about a Stingray being used in an investigation where charges are brought forth leads me to believe that defense lawyers know of a Stingray's use, or they have no clue because it isnt being disclosed.

    When searching Canadian media sites to see if reporters are digging deeper into the use of Stingray device by Canadian law enforcement agencies, there really isnt any reporting of this going on only what has been reported by motherboard and Techdirt and re blurbed by some Canadian media.

    Maybe the media up in the great white north doesnt like to ruffle the feathers of Law Enforcement too much

  • Aug 12th, 2016 @ 11:56am

    (untitled comment)

    Somewhere in a corner office at the FBI James Comey's eyes are welling up with tears of joy that his message on how backdoors are needed is finally coming to fruition

  • Aug 12th, 2016 @ 9:28am


    All that was missing from the above reply was the signature of someone from the MPAA

  • Aug 8th, 2016 @ 7:52pm

    Re: "I got a candy bar yesterday, you owe me a candy bar today."

    I agree.

    The RIAA and MPAA whose membership include a lot of music and film industries biggest companies still want the days of old when they controlled how, when, where, what format and what you payed to get the media from the end destination, thus they controlled the monies before they got distributed out after deductions for various accounting, production, distribution and advertising and of course if there was anything left over giving whoever their pittance.

    Now that artists and film makers have a say and can put out their own albums thru various methods of release and even cut the studios and labels out of the equation troubles the RIAA and MPAA as they see their take of the pie become less and they have less control where an artist, band or film is not under their thumb.

    Honestly Google and every other company that sells dvd or MP3's, cd's, or media for download or to stream online could give the RIAA/MPAA 99 cent out of every dollar and they would still scream it isn't enough and how they are being cheated.

    The RIAA/MPAA with their studio's and Labels as clients have said the same thing time and time again. When casette and casette records came out they said it would be the death of music labels and artists and they needed a levy to survive.

    When VHS and Beta recorders came out the same refrain was screamed again at how it would be the death of the industry and a levy was needed.

    When CD's and DVD's came out and the record able media methods were once again purported to be the death knell of their industries... unless a levy was added

    Over and over again we have seen the same mantra over and over again from the RIAA/MPAA crying out the same complaints.

    No matter how much Google, Youtube, Apple increase either the MPAA or RIAA aligned clients a better percentage it will never be enough and it will only placate them till the next time they fell they deserve even more.

    They do not give a shit about the consumer and are uninterested in what the consumer will pay or in what way the consumer can get the media they desire.

    It has always been this way for the MPAA/RIAA and its clients, it always will be and wont change. The consumer will always be the one held hostage to the whims of the clients of the RIAA /MPAA and they could care less what the consumer see's as fair and convenient

  • Aug 2nd, 2016 @ 5:22pm

    (untitled comment)

    So basically the FBI wanted to get the courts approval and the court would not grant it's approval, so the FBI just ignored the courts directive and just did it anyway.

    Nice to know the FBI doesnt believe it needs to follow the laws it was sworn to uphold and are governed by.

  • Jul 9th, 2016 @ 4:10am

    (untitled comment)

    Isn't it convenient that the FBI wrapped up their investigation of Clinton and decided "nothing to see here" before this DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision came out.

    One has to wonder if there was pressure applied thru the USDOJ to the FBI to make sure there "investigation" of HRC was completed before the DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision came down, thus the republicans and media along with Trump couldn't point to the Appeals court decision and say "a-ha"

    Could this be just strange timing? Sure. Could it be avoiding Stepping on a landmine by asserting some political might with the help of the White House so as not to threaten the democrat nominee for POTUS? You'll have to decide that one yourself, but the optics sure does make an interesting point of debate.

  • Jul 7th, 2016 @ 5:14pm

    Re: Conspiracy!

    Your bang on. I Agree and the conspiracy will rage on because of the tactics that Federal Law Agencies like the FBI are using to keep information out of reach of other agencies, the media and citizens.

  • Jul 5th, 2016 @ 11:53pm

    (untitled comment)

    There are things that bother me about the DEA and the original court that heard the case first. The DEA knew there were defenses but yet still filed for a got a warrant for a search.

    Then you have the court which it knows that the DEA has a ton of defenses in the warrant and their case and knows by law that the results of that search should be excluded due to the defenses in the original warrant application.

    The fact that the court knew that the evidence gathered as a result of the warrant should be tossed as a matter of law, decides to ignore that to help the DEA keep their case alive.

    The Judge is supposed to be unbiased and the defendants and plaintiff are to be treated equally and have their evidence evaluated by the laws on which it was obtained. The problem is too many Judges and courts seem to be more than willing to skip the being impartial part and do their best to help secure a conviction against an accused person.

    If the prosecution is unable to make their case according to the law, then that should be that. To have Judges take their impartiality out of the equation to help a case along is a travesty under the rules of court, the constitution and the rights afforded to an accused person.

    It's sad to see how much some court Judges have lost their ability to be impartial and fair and rule according to the law and not the fringes of it. It is why I say if your an accused you are no longer innocent until proven guilty but are guilty until you can prove your innocence and these days the deck is getting stacked more and more against an accused

  • Jun 29th, 2016 @ 1:04am

    (untitled comment)

    I doubt anyone is shocked at this revelation. The U.S. and various special interest groups and their lobbyists have instituted protectionist tariffs, duties and bills to thwart their trading partners and when the decision come down from the WTO panel usually against the U.S. only then do they back down, this is more than a common theme it has been happening for years and years.

    I find it rather amusing that the U.S. is bitching about the WTO Panels rulings when they were part of the process that brought in NAFTA AND other trade agreements.

    The U.S. agreed as did the other countries who signed the agreement to the dispute mechanism way back when, but when the U.S is found to be in violation of the trade agreement they dont like the rules all of a sudden and the way the disputes are adjudicated.

    Maybe if the U.S. didn't let lobbyists and special interest groups throw gobs of money at the members of senators and congress as a means to protectionism of those groups profits to stifle the competition the U.S. wouldnt be crying about how many times they have violated those trade agreements rules and got smacked on the hand by the WTO panel.

    I can only wait to see how TPP is going to go, it is going to be some of the same B.S. and we are alll going to get screwed because of it being forced down are throats

  • Jun 10th, 2016 @ 2:28pm

    (untitled comment)

    John Steele and Paul Hansmeier ought to be the forefront of every law school's ethic's class on "when to know you have crossed the line"

    The lure of easy cash settlement and the addiction to them is one of the major factors of what brought Prenda law down. These guys were so greedy they even started to cut the studios who were there clients out of the picture and make their own films, their own film entities just so they wouldn't have to give a cut of the settlements to those previous studios and this way they could keep 100% of the settlements

    Even after all the hot water these two have been in they still pled stupid and kept using the "we didn't do nuffin" line when the evidence proved otherwise.

    Steele and Hansmeier still haven't learned anything and are still addicted to the easy settlement cash that they are doing the ADA troll lawsuits, and ask Hansmeier how well that is going for him?

    Dont know, well allow me to fill you in Hansmeier has been so busy with his filings in Minnesota and pissing off small business so much that those small businesses have gone to the media and the city and state legislators to cry fowl over these drive by ADA lawsuits that the state legislator passed some law that would severally restrict how an ADA claim in a lawsuit is played out, now Hans cant just ask for cash to go away.

    Hansmeier must now give the defendant time to make good on the decencies that are alleged in the lawsuit. So that angle is sewering for his litigation.

    Stelle is also in the ADA lawsuit game in Illnois, and guess who is rumored to be working with him...Mark Lutz Yes that same Mark Lutz who is the CEO mastermind businessman behind AF Holdings etc etc etc.

    I guess Lutz got tired of all that hectic corporate business and decided to settle for being one of Steele's underlings shaking -er negotiating settlements, or whatever else he does for Steele.

    I hope the Feds slap these Guys with RICO and wire and Mail fraud, but time will tell. Lord knows they deserve everything they get

  • Jun 10th, 2016 @ 7:40am

    (untitled comment)

    So NYT readership is down, ad sales are down, so how do you find other sources of revenue, ah good old copyright.

    I wonder how long they think that will last if they are going to charge rates like that and play the heavy hand. This ought to go well.

  • Jun 9th, 2016 @ 4:10pm

    (untitled comment)

    Remember when the police duties were to uphold the law and stop crimes from being committed, and help citizens when needed.

    It would seem nowadays that while that still appears to be their directive that various agencies in the Law Enforcement sector have turned their duties of enforcement into revenue generation.

    These days we have photo radar and red light cameras which are alleged to be for enforcement of the laws they fall under but most people see as revenue generation under the guise of enforcement.

    There are quotas for officers to write so many traffic tickets per month (even though most Police agencies deny this, but has been stated as such by some officers) and with those monetary fines it adds up for the department.

    In the city where I live when photo radar was first introduced it made 3 million a year, the next year it made 7 million a year as they bought more photo radar equipped vehicles and they have continued to do so. In 2015 my city police department collected 45 million from photo radar... yes you read that right 45 million.

    People and even politicians have been complaining in my city to the mayor and it's council members that the police departments use of photo radar is not being use as a deterrent as meant, but as a revenue generation tool. The Police and our city Traffic safety office are very elusive about how and why they were able to generate 45 million from photo radar.

    The media in my city had picked up on this and had found out that the powers that be and the police decided to lower the threshold of how many kilometers over the posted speed limit you had to be going over before you got a ticket.

    The city traffic safety office and the police will not confirm or deny what that threshold is and will not confirm what the media is reporting it as.

    The Police and traffic safety office have also been fighting against the call from citizens and council members to put more signs of what the posted speed limit is some areas where the speed goes from 60 to say 50 because they say it is not needed and drivers should know this already.

    every year there are more and more red light and photo radar cameras going up at high traffic locations through out the city. ( and of course while the police and traffic safety office wont say it most of the public know that if you have 45000 cars going thru that particular intersection at rush hour times you are going to catch a percentage speeding and they know this and are playing the odds)

    It seems more and more that law enforcement agencies are concerned with revenue generation under the guise of enforcement, and asset forfeiture seems to be the new "it" thing to achieve that goal.

    The slippery slope and tactics law enforcement is employing these days seems to be of the we do what we want mantra and your rights be damned innocent or not.

    Law Enforcement wonders why there is a major shift in the perception the people have about them nowadays and how they are under such scrutiny by the public and press, maybe it's the shit like this that they do by seizing some citizens money when no crime has been committed is just one more reason why

  • Jun 9th, 2016 @ 3:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Just dont be carrying your chickens when the annual police association Bar-B-Que is upcoming on the claendar

  • Jun 9th, 2016 @ 3:33pm

    Re: Re:

    If the wife see the profits in the bank, she'll take care of it for me before I can go and spend

  • Jun 9th, 2016 @ 9:19am

    (untitled comment)

    The more stories of asset forfeiture come to the forefront, the more horrified I am at the abuse of power that is taking place all across the country.

    There is no you are innocent until you are proven guilty with the forfeiture of your funds.

    Many folks carry cash when travelling on the road of if they are going to make a purchase outright or a down payment ( which a lot of people still do when going to buy goods such as vehicles, recreational vehicles, Furniture, Electronics etc) because some times the seller doesn't want a cheque or a bank draft due to fraudsters making those various forgeries and some times you can get a better deal with cash.

    It was bad enough that anyone who had cash and got stopped and said they had cash was suspected of drug dealing or money laundering or whatever else the cop that pulled you over thought was appropriate to liberate you money now they can do it and take your funds because you have a prepaid debit or credit card??? Like WTF

    This is more than an abuse of police power but this is an abuse of due process and of a persons constitutional rights. Just because I carry cash or a pre paid card does not mean I am doing it for nefarious purposes.

    I have had upwards of 35k in cash on me and it wasnt for illegal purposes but it is because I got to a lot of vehicle and equipment auctions and buy vehicles, tools, equipment that I will then sell for a profit (hopefully).

    I carry that kind of cash because I know if I am buying cars trucks SUV or what not that at an auction and depending how many I buy and for what price that I can pay the price for the vehicle, the auctioneers fee and the taxes and then take it home that very day or get it paid for and come pick it up later and thus dont have to worry about any storage fees charged by the auction facility.

    So because I have that kind of cash does it mean I am a criminal or doing something nefarious, no it doesnt, but somehow I doubt the cops would care even if I had proof.

    The more I hear about asset forfeiture of peoples cash the more I liken it to copyright trolling and patent trolling who look for victims and then shake them down for settlements, to me this has ring to it like asset forfeiture in that some people are not going to fight it and those who do get offered a percentage of their money back and the cops etc keep the rest.

    I find it even more astonishing that this company that makes this device is taking 7.7% of what the cops seize and that state and federal agencies think this is all A-OK that people are being robbed by roadside bandits disguised as law enforcement... oh wait IT IS law enforcement!

    It is shady shit like this that just heaps more distrust of law enforcement and government who are supposed to be looking out for it's citizens, not running roughshod over their rights and stealing from them.

    When I was young we were always taught that the police officer is your friend and they are their to help you, but these days it seems while that it is getting to be more and more of dont trust the police officer and what you do and say for fear of where it may lead you in your interactions with them.

  • Jun 7th, 2016 @ 1:06pm

    (untitled comment)

    Well this ought to do wonders for trying to enlist future clients. Rather than admit their error they decided to double down and throw in a bunch of shit to make it look scary.

    All that is missing from the is the red floppy hair, the over sized shoes and the red nose to put on their representative that will no doubt be delivering a subpoena any minute now.

  • Jun 6th, 2016 @ 5:14pm

    (untitled comment)

    The real sad thing is that a persons rights as laid out in the constitution seem to not mean a thing and do not matter at all to the Government, the US DOJ or Law Enforcement.

    It is the same with the rights an accused has when they have been charged with a criminal offense. It is no longer you are innocent until proven guilty, now it is more you are guilty unless you can prove your innocence, and these days that is starting to be a very uphill battle.

    There is way to much collusion between prosecutors, law enforcement and judges and when it comes to following the letter of the law most judges seem to give the government , prosecutes and law enforcement a wide birth in which to operate.

    An accused nowadays faces an uphill battle with forces that conceal, lie, mislead and fail to be forth right in disclosure to the defense counsel and the accused in way of due process.

    I believe if the forefathers could see how the constitution and the rights enshrined in it are being trampled over and discard like gum on a shoe, they'd be pissed and would be of mind at a travesty that is taking place.

    The Goverment now seeks to win at all costs, whether the playing field is fair matters not, as long as they get the win that is all the care about.

    What a mess they have made of the one thing Americans have always had pride in.

  • Jun 3rd, 2016 @ 1:10pm

    (untitled comment)

    I wonder if the owners of Prestigious Pets ever thought "Paul Levy, I wonder who that is" and did a google search.

    It would seem this ham fisted attempt to bully these folks into submission and get cash out of the deal is going to go over about as well as Kleargear attempt to do the same a while back.

    Well this wont be a cheap lesson to learn that these clauses usually never stand up when in court and that Paul Levy doesn't usually lose them either and gets costs awarded to him.

  • May 26th, 2016 @ 1:05pm


    I believe Lutz is working with Steele in Illinois in the ADA lawsuit game that Steele has going on there. What's that old saying Birds Of A Feather...

  • May 26th, 2016 @ 11:47am

    (untitled comment)

    What will be interesting is if this will fit the statues of RICO and if it does which one of the two remaining Prenda gang will be tripping over themselves to try and strike a deal.

    We all know CEO mastermind of AF Holdings and related shell companies Mark Lutz (formerly Johns Steele's paralegal and process server) will cave in five minutes of questioning and beg to be a witness, and after his brilliant performance when questioned by the Florida Judge in the Sunlust that went over like a led balloon and it didn't help that Steele was trying to whisper the answers to Lutz who was being questioned by the Judge, until the Judge noticed that and then started questioning Steele on what he was doing and who he was.

    So Lutz would roll the easiest. Now Gibbs who Steele and Hansmeier tried to get to take the blame and then pressure to take the hit before Judge Wright in his court room would make a very powerful witness for the DOJ as Gibbs would have inside knowledge as to how the trolling scheme for settlements worked.

    I am sure Steele and Hansmeier may be wishing that they did not try to throw Gibbs under the bus. I wouldnt at all be surprised to see if Steele and Hansmeier tried to put the blame Duffy's way since he has passed on and there would be no rebuttal from that end.

    Everyone knows Steele and Hansmeier reaped the profits from their trolling collective and the greed became so much that they started to loathe having to give the pron producers who were their clients when they started this their cut from the settlements, so they decided to be their own porn creators, leakers, monitoring firm, and law firm with the goal of keeping as near as 100% of the profits of their scheme to themselves.

    How the mighty have fallen. Hansmeier bankruptcy getting converted due to falsehoods on his original chapter filing. Now his Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuit settlement scheme is about to come to a crashing halt due to the state of Minnesota enacting legislation to prevent the drive by ADA lawsuits and their abuse of the Americans with Disabilities act in Minnesota which incidentally was brought to the forefront because of Paul Hansmeier filing so many lawsuits and looking for settlements.

    The Irony that Hansmeier and his greed is bringing his ADA lawsuits settlement came crashing down around him is way more than just and just too damn funny, you reap what you sow Paul.

    So Steele must be on his desk peeing his pants at what has transpired with Hansmeier and knowing he is on the trolley tracks and people in Illinois are starting to make noise over the ADA suits Steele is filing there and not only that but the ADA abuse and lawsuit generation scheme is gaining notoriety all over the USA as people are complaining to the politicians about the issue.

    Its been a long time coming and the Prenda gang deserves what they get, I hope they have many many sleepless night ahead of them as they have cause many for a lot of their victims.

    The bell tolls for Hansmeier and Steele, it will be interesting to see what happens when the music stops playing and their are no chairs left. The race will be on to cut a deal. Who will fold first I wonder.

More comments from Anon E. Mous >>