Dave’s Techdirt Profile

permanent4

About Dave




Dave’s Comments comment rss

  • Apr 27th, 2015 @ 3:27pm

    Mike could use an anger translator.

    Forget the blog post, Mike. You need to make a video of yourself talking about TPP with an anger translator behind you. It would be YouTube GOLD, I tell you...

  • Apr 21st, 2015 @ 8:57am

    Verizon will lose this one.

    Guys, if Verizon is violating a contractual agreement, then they're violating a contractual agreement. Verizon can pull this stunt on individual customers who can't afford to fight back, but against Disney? They'll lose.

    Whatever new TV paradigm Verizon is trying to create here, worthwhile or otherwise, is irrelevant. This is going to come down to contract law, and if the contract specifically states that Verizon cannot offer ESPN in a separate sports tier, Disney will force Verizon to honor the contract -- something Verizon probably does to enough of its wireless customers to deserve that.

    In the meantime, ESPN has lost 6 million customers in the last 4 years. No matter -- they can still demand the terms they want, including that 6.5% annual carriage fee increase, because they have 20 of the top 21 highest-rated cable TV broadcasts of all time. (I believe the Kentucky-Wisconsin college basketball semifinal on TBS a few weeks ago cracked ESPN's complete hold on the top 20.) They won't really feel the pinch unless they lose another 20 million subs within the next five years or so, and even then, they can probably remain profitable and let sweetheart carriage deals with Sling TV and Apple TV pick up the slack.

  • Apr 8th, 2015 @ 8:48am

    Re: Why now?

    Disney is not a huge fan of Comcast getting more control over the TV space, because Comcast can use that control to keep ESPN's ever-growing carriage fees in check. There's a reason Disney was first to strike a deal with Dish Network to put channels on Sling TV, which happened within weeks of Comcast announcing it was buying out Time Warner Cable.

    So it's entirely possible that at least one giant media company is getting something it wants out of all this.

  • Apr 6th, 2015 @ 10:14am

    (untitled comment)

    This story would have been funnier if he had posed for a photo with Martha Stewart. That said, I doubt the result would have been that much different.

  • Mar 13th, 2015 @ 2:14pm

    Re: Get your headlines here

    ...and John Fogerty sues himself.

  • Mar 10th, 2015 @ 1:57pm

    Roundly trounced?

    Roku cracked 10 million in total units sold last September. Apple is up to 25 million Apple TV units sold, and more than half of those are the current 3rd-gen model. I would hardly call that "roundly trounced".

    Plus, Netflix + Hulu Plus + HBO Now + AirPlay will be compelling enough for plenty of people over the next 3 months. (Might be a different case come the holidays, though.)

  • Mar 10th, 2015 @ 1:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 90 days

    Ha! I also have both devices. It's not so far fetched to have more than one set-top box or streaming stick anymore, given that they don't cost much and can serve different purposes.

  • Mar 10th, 2015 @ 1:41pm

    Re:

    The people interested in GoT and nothing else will probably continue pirating. HBO is counting on that group being very, very small -- especially given the sheer number of shows (True Detective, The Wire, Treme, Boardwalk Empire, etc.) that many will likely find binge-worthy. That's HBO Now's value proposal.

    And it's only a hassle to sign up and then cancel if you're dealing with a cable company. It wasn't nearly as bad when I did it with DishWorld and Hulu Plus.

  • Mar 10th, 2015 @ 1:16pm

    Re: Re: Re: 90 days

    It's also a blatant supply chain-emptying move by Tim Cook. He's trying to clear out Apple TVs, possibly to introduce a new product later this year. That said, it's a move that seems likely to work out for Apple.

  • Mar 10th, 2015 @ 1:12pm

    Not entirely sure I buy this argument.

    I feel a strange urge to play devil's advocate on this one -- which I know is usually a bad idea on this site, but follow me on this...

    Yes, people who just want to watch Game of Thrones and either refuse to pay or don't want to watch any other HBO shows will continue seeding torrents. That's not going away.

    But...

    1.) Apple TV has already sold 25 million Apple TV units to date, and based loosely on the sales figures listed on Wikipedia, more than half those units appear to be the 3rd-generation model, which has not been jailbroken. That's a pretty big installed base, and lowering the price on Apple TV ensures that base will grow. (It's a blatant supply chain-emptying move by Tim Cook, yes, but most potential buyers won't care that much.)

    2.) Having more than one set-top box connected to a TV isn't so far-fetched these days. I have both an Apple TV and a Roku 3. They do have some different uses -- the Roku has Amazon Prime, Sling TV, and DIAL streaming, while the Apple TV has a superior podcast interface and AirPlay for certain iPad apps I like to use. I used to have a Chromecast as well. Given how cheap all these STBs and streaming sticks are now, it's not so odd for cord-cutters to buy and use more than one.

    3.) HBO Now's value proposal goes beyond GoT. Think of all those other HBO series and movies that people might not have seen yet -- The Wire, True Detective, Veep, Treme, Boardwalk Empire, etc. That's a lot of binge-watching for not that much money. Sure, you can pirate all of them, but for $15/month, you can stream the whole kit and caboodle and not have to look at those soul-sucking porn ads. (Or maybe I'm the only guy who's grown weary of computer-animated tits. You tell me.) Netflix streaming traffic overtook torrent traffic FOUR YEARS AGO. That proved people will pay for convenience. This is what HBO Now is offering, and it *will* be compelling to many who only use torrents because HBO hadn't otherwise made it convenient. Does Apple exclusivity lessen that convenience for a few months? Sure, but the installed Apple TV base and the relatively low cost of entry *will* attract customers.

    4.) This is a long play for HBO, and for its parent company, Time Warner, which licensed its Turner Broadcasting channels to Sling TV. By Labor Day, *all* those channels will be available on a *lot* of STBs and streaming sticks. Apple exclusivity is just a temporary move to help keep Comcast off its back for a while.

    Also, apropos of nothing:

    5.) At least one market research group (Parks Associates) has predicted that as many as 7 million people will get rid of cable TV once HBO Now becomes available. I don't think it will be quite that high all at once, but let's revisit that figure a year from now and see how close they got.

    6.) None of this takes into account HBO Go password-sharing, which is also likely to rise with the premier of GoT season 5 -- especially if cable companies still try to offer customers 3 months of free HBO. That might already be putting a dent in piracy without anyone examining it too closely. It's certainly a reason why HBO Now exists in any form. If the market wasn't there, HBO wouldn't bother.

  • Jan 27th, 2015 @ 4:58am

    About these better products...

    Would these be the same products from which artists are pulling their music, because they claim a million streams only nets them a few hundred bucks?

    The same products that Taylor Swift claims is devaluing her art?

    The same products that Thom Yorke, who made a mint on a BitTorrent release, called "the last desperate fart of a dying corpse" and a new tool for major label gatekeeping?

    Just checking.

  • Jan 12th, 2015 @ 12:56pm

    Re: Re: Re: Other Law Enforcement Truth

    Would more peach signs mean fewer Apple logos everywhere?

  • Jan 8th, 2015 @ 9:37am

    Sling TV (right now) is great for basketball fans.

    ESPN and TNT show a ton of NBA games, including most of the playoffs. ESPN also shows a lot of college basketball, and TBS/TNT will air a huge chunk of the NCAA Tournament, including the Final this year. So if you like hoops but hate your cable company, this might work. (And there have been studies showing basketball fans skew younger than other sports, so this falls in line with Dish's target market here.)

    If you're a hockey fan, forget it. There's no way Dish and Comcast come to terms here, especially if Charlie Ergen gets on Capitol Hill and starts screaming about data caps being uncompetitive.

    Here's a guide to help you figure out if Sling TV is right for you:

    http://www.whatyoupayforsports.com/2015/01/is-sling-tv-right-for-you-a-guide-for-potential-cord- cutters/

  • Dec 8th, 2014 @ 5:51am

    It needs to be said...

    Brett Glass is full of crap.

    After I got on Twitter and bemoaned the lack of competition among ISPs in my city, he told me I was misguided, because there was plenty of competition provided by WISPs out there. Never mind the fact that:

    1. A bit of Googling failed to uncover an WISPs in the Raleigh-Durham area, and
    2. I live in an apartment, so even if a WISP existed, I couldn't put up an antenna to use it.

    So what, I'm supposed to move into a house in another city to conform to Brett Glass' little Wyoming fantasy world? Right. When I challenged him to find a WISP, any WISP, here in the Triangle, he offered no help and just told me I was delusional and there was no hope for me.

    Brett Glass has no clue what the vast majority of consumers have to go through in this country with their internet access. I blocked him on Twitter. You should, too.

  • Nov 22nd, 2014 @ 10:24am

    (untitled comment)

    I've been using BeyondPod for Android, mostly because it works with Chromecast, although sometimes I find myself defaulting to the Roku when I'm at home.

    Of course, you can check out my music podcast on the web, SoundCloud, AND Stitcher...

    http://daveslounge,com/

  • May 29th, 2014 @ 2:43pm

    Another possibility

    Now that ESPN is valued at more than one-third of the entire Walt Disney Company, Disney is simply focusing fewer resources on copyright protection and more resources on simply keeping the cable bundle intact, so that they can continue to collect $70/year from people who don't care about sports but gotta have their Mad Men fix.

  • Mar 5th, 2014 @ 6:27pm

    This deal could be a strike at Comcast.

    Consider this:

    1.) The Comcast-NBCU merger practically prevents NBC from withholding its programming from other services, but even if it didn't, if Dish wants to settle on similar terms with NBC, Comcast can't afford to be viewed as a holdout. Any appearance that Comcast abusing their market position could convince regulators to block the buyout of TWC.

    2.) Should Dish get this IPTV service off the ground, Charlie Ergen could go in front of the press (and Congress) and claim that Comcast's data caps are anti-competitive, because they prevent Comcast Internet customers from using Dish. That could force Comcast to concede on data caps to get the TWC acquisition through.

    3.) In terms of the marketplace, Dish has a long-term partnership with Frontier Communications to be the TV portion of their "triple play" package, but Frontier can't offer that package to apartment dwellers who can't put up a satellite dish. If Dish gets this IPTV service working, that changes, and those renters who hate Comcast and TWC can have a legit alternative for TV service.

    I don't know about you, but I'm okay with losing Auto-hop if it means either putting the kibosh on data caps, blocking the Comcast-TWC merger, or costing either of them a large number of customers.

  • Sep 11th, 2013 @ 12:48pm

    Hang on a minute...

    Just because the guy who wrote YMCA decides that he doesn't want whoever the Village People are now to perform the song anymore, the whole concept of a song's copyright reverting back to the creator is suddenly a "dumb idea"?

    I don't buy that. Think about all the songs that the major labels currently "own" that they're practically hoarding in a vault somewhere and not promoting at all. Musicians have far more avenues for promoting their compositions in 2013 than they did in 1978. Why shouldn't those musicians take those songs back and do something new with them? Why should the labels be allowed to keep those songs locked up in perpetuity?

    One guy who doesn't get the concept does not invalidate the concept. Give the art back to the artists.

  • Aug 22nd, 2013 @ 9:51am

    (untitled comment)

    Yeah, and they sure look like heels in the process.

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    I'll show myself out.

  • May 14th, 2013 @ 2:22pm

    Well, actually...

    I've done a bit of number-crunching on the impact cord cutting might have on ESPN.

    http://www.whatyoupayforsports.com/2013/04/could-espn-weather-a-growth-in-cord-cutting/

    tl;dr : Because their current deal with cable & satellite carriers calls for a 6.5% carriage fee increase every year, ESPN's annual carriage fee income will continue to increase between now and 2020 -- unless the annual number of cord cutters increases by 50%, year over year. And that rate of cord cutting seems rather unlikely at the moment.

    Also, if ESPN became a premium channel, the network would need 40.7 million subscribers at $14.95/month, or 30.5 million subscribers at $19.95/month, to make as much as it makes now in annual carriage fees -- about $7.3 billion -- from ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, and ESPNEWS. And it probably couldn't get away with selling $3.3 billion in ads if it went premium.

    So yeah, big media really isn't going to change until we all stop giving it so much money.

More comments from Dave >>