Maybe they meant police killed and assaulted by people will now include giving cops dirty looks. They assaulted me with their eyes so I bashed their head in with my nightstick.
You have to be enslaved by it before you can read it
Some like myself will not care about it. As it in no way affects us or the things we do.
save that in this case they will be promoted and rewarded for furthering their rogue agency's cause in spite of the laws.
Who do you believe, your lying eyes and ears or your trusty government. "We are from the government we are here to help (mostly ourselves at your expense)"
There might be a way to code around that If you trust following instructions you randomly find online
Like operation "choke point" where the DoJ illegaly targeted porn actors by forcing businesses and banks to shut down any accounts with said porn industry in an attempt to make them go bankrupt.Nothing like have a police force decide who is moral and who is not then abusing their power to enforce their views on them.
the problem though comes from if you restrict guns from your citizens you need to restrict them from the cops, and just about everyone else. Allowing for exceptions makes such a gun ban pointless.As it is there are far fewer gun toting murderers than there are gun owners.Even if you banned guns from 99% of the population there would still be that disconnect.Personally I think we should focus on the mental health problem more than what weapon they happen to use for their murder sprees.Otherwise we might as well ban every other object that people use to murder. That would be stuff like cars, cutlery, heavy objects, etc.
That is the fun thing about revolutions the corrupt rules tend to go out the window. About the only good thing though, as there is enough to make people refuse to do them unless as a last resort.
I wonder if he assaulted them with his staring eyes as well.
Websites like this promote people to think for themselves. That's allowing the dangerous thought crimes to spread further.It's terrorism to operate a site like this.of course the obligatory note that it is sarcasm. Though I know people that actually think like this and I am ashamed to have them as friends
Considering there are American soldiers protecting opium drug fields in Afghanistan at the DEA's behest I doubt anything will come of this.
Sounds more like the question are you insane more than do you have game
I have seen people that would kill someone else's defenseless pet just because they can and know they can get away with it.
Be blindly loyal to your government. Refuse to believe anything you hear that portrays them in a negative light. Report anyone that tells you such things to the nearest thought police coordinator.Give up your rights because your government tells you, defending your rights equals terrorism. Become a slave because its the patriotic thing to do, etc.
Have to make the criminals that benefit from this crime happy otherwise they might retaliate against the democratic process and we cannot do that out of fear of course.Terrorism by any other name sounds like.
I would hold to the police ignoring crimes committed by police but prosecuting non cops that do the same crimes. Probably has a very high share of the blame.You earn respect, you do not demand it at the point of a gun
So you are basing your whole argument on what might be, but cannot be proven. But you claim that method of doing things in flawed when people do the same thing to counter your argument?
I suspect they are preparing for it.
Another news site I will never use again then. If I wanted to be told what to think without discussing it I would still watch the tv news
More comments from Padpaw >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Padpaw.
Submit a story now.