Wayne’s Techdirt Profile


About Wayne

Wayne’s Comments comment rss

  • Aug 5th, 2011 @ 7:01am


    A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client and you, Mr Wolk, are a fool.

    If you would like to sue me please do because I think you are a complete and total waste of space although thank god you decided to be a lawyer and not something useful or important that people actually need like an underarm deodorant sniff tester, or a bubble gum pre-chewer even those idiots from Westboro Baptist church have more value than you do. I don't understand how this guy can win an 89 million trial award and be this clueless. I mean does he really think anyone is all that concerned about being sued by him? Lawyers, Politicians and used car salesmen are all people that this world would be better off without. We can f**k up the world without their expert help.
  • Aug 2nd, 2011 @ 9:44am

    (untitled comment)

    darnit, somebody mentioned Jack Thompson before I could.
  • Jul 25th, 2011 @ 10:02am

    (untitled comment)

    This is just stupid. The Video games were the problem? Didn't he use the video games to train himself, what a laugh, to do what he had already decided? Wasn't he a religious extremist? I would say its not the video games that are the problem to be banned, I would say the Bible was the problem that caused him to be this way, so we should just ban bibles, then these idiots won't get their crazy ideas and use video games.
  • Dec 13th, 2010 @ 3:54pm

    (untitled comment)

    Damn it, do you realize what this means?

    my girlfriend is right and karma does really exist :)
  • Dec 10th, 2010 @ 12:46pm

    The latest response

    When I asked him to explain what was unthinking

    "You don't demonstrate any understanding about the issue? Links?"

    Did I miss something, or get something wrong? or am i just confused (admittedly my co-workers would say yes based on my general absent mindedness)
  • Dec 10th, 2010 @ 12:03pm

    I got a response

    his exact response

    "Sorry, I don't respond to the unthinking."

    of course not, you wouldn't want to have to try to explain the hypocrisy of your actions. coward
  • Dec 10th, 2010 @ 11:57am

    RE: F Sherman - email to him

    i have sent the following to him

    Now that you have updated your blog to show the correct link, maybe you can explain your actions in such a way as to show how your linking infringing material is not like stealing a corvette as you have previously written? Or is it only stealing when someone else does it? Come on, your such a big supporter of RightHaven filing lawsuits against everyone for exactly the same reason, I really would like you to write a blog post defending your action in posting a link to infringing material. Hypocrite.

    maybe a little antagonistic but considering his position on the subject i don't think I went overboard

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it