Leonardo’s Techdirt Profile

equitystep

About Leonardo




Leonardo’s Comments comment rss

  • Apr 10th, 2014 @ 7:33am

    Comcast Analysis is Faulty and Very Much Inaccurate

    Folks, NYC landlords get revenue from TWV or VZ Fios when they let them in the building. To date you will find one or the other. Therefore although there may be dozens of fiber lines under the avenues, the last mile to the consumer in New York City is usually ONE PROVIDER. The part that is tragic for consumers like myself is TWC has raised broadband prices thye last 4 years from $40 to $60 (50% increase) and the coaxial cable in my apartment is greater than 20 years at least. It is insulting to an intelligent consumer paying $60 for 9mps broadband connection when my friend in Mexico City pays $70 for a 300mps broadband connection. My freinds the U.S. economy depends on broadband and this type of last mile manipulation does not help the country.

  • Apr 3rd, 2014 @ 5:56am

    Broadcasters do not innovate and do not compete.

    NAB president Gordon Smith states before Congress: "Today, broadcasters compete with wireless companies, pay-TV providers and over-the-top services for eyeballs and advertising."

    Last I checked, retransmission fees are a corporate subsidy granted by Congress which needs to be eliminated so that this statement could be truthful. The broadcasters were given the over the air spectrum by Congress to provide Americans with Universal Access to their content (FREE) and quite frankly, the broadcasters have decided not to innovate and provide Universal Access in order to protect their retransmission fees and payTV model which certainlt is not free markets.

  • May 15th, 2013 @ 5:46am

    Chris Morran's congestion analysis is FLAWED

    Most of the spectrum the wireless carriers have is configured as FDD, at a time when voice was paramount, the requirement that the capacity for uplink and downlink be equal made sense. Most of the capacity constraints today are video which is primarily on the down link. What that means if a carrier has 40MHz of LTE spectrum, reality is only 20MHz is available for the downlink. Sprint is the only carrier advocating TDD which is dynamic allocation, uplink or downlink where the capacity demand occurs at the cell site. This is why there are data caps- the network is limited in flexibility because of FDD.

  • Feb 12th, 2013 @ 5:51am

    NFL stadiums subsidized by Tax Payer's Dollars

    Add insult to injury, factor in the number of NFL stadiums that have received government/municipal financing and tax breaks, then perhaps your story would be more comprehensive.

  • Oct 10th, 2012 @ 5:26am

    Huawei CANNOT BE TRUSTED

    The post by Mike Masnick is extraordinarily naive.

    LTE is entirely IP. You can test all you want and find nothing today.

    The one thing tests will not find is what future software migrations and upgrades may bring or trigger. No testing in the world can find this. Logistically impossible to implement testing insitu.

    The fundamental question is can you trust a China company with your Core? Answer: NO.

    Most of the Tier-1 carriers have significant government enterprise business and the risk of installing Huawei "Cores" is like giving the Navy's Carrier Nimitz to China and asking China to provide maintenance and other logistical services.

  • Nov 3rd, 2011 @ 12:14pm

    Re: Re: iTunes is Vampire

    Nonetheless if I do not take Apple's deal of 30% plus their requirement that small artists need to go to an outside "aggregator" which takes another 30%-40%, so I have new business partners that are taking 70% of the upside, yes even if I do not take that deal, Apple's deal is a VAMPIRE deal and you do agree since you say just do not take the deal!

  • Nov 3rd, 2011 @ 6:26am

    (untitled comment)

    Peter willl be most happay when China hackers copy his code and sell "Happy Birds" to gloabl consumers underming his brand strategy and paying Peter zippo.

    Peter will be most happy then!

  • Nov 3rd, 2011 @ 6:23am

    iTunes is Vampire

    30% for Apple is too much commissions for an artist to have their songs uploaded and downloaded off the platform.

    And Apple says you have to go to an "aggregator" which then takes another 30%-40% so now an artist is down to 30%.

    Both Apple and "aggregator" do not pay for any of the upfront costs on music production or promotional materials like video, so its a "riskless opportunistic" transaction.

    Realistically the 30% should be shared between Apple and any "aggegrators" they impose for simply uploading digital files to their platform.

    Else there is a case for Applle being a Vampire!