BUT, to get any money from this TAX they would have to prove that their articles are backed up by facts and failing that are unbiased. 90% of the tax would go to paying 3rd parties doing fact checking. This tax would not be paid for by tax payers but by ISPs and any service that shares the articles. If the Article is found to be lacking of real facts, then the Media company will not get any money and will have to pay a fine each time equal to the tax charged to ISPs for at least a year for every offense. They would also have to not sue companies like google for linking their articles. Also, any Linking page owner who pays the tax, those who follow the link can not be stopped by paywalls.
Like any other service or good that is regulated, the cost will just be pushed to the consumer...
On a serious note, I am waiting for them to take down all the Brothel websites, escort websites, etc as they are promoting the same damned thing. Oh wait, Politicians use THOSE services so those are ok.
Where I love you Mike (maybe not in THAT way) but seriously, this is status quo for the Trump camp. Name 1 person in the Trump camp that is going to be good for Joe Q Public that will foot their bills for the next 4 years?
So they see this picture as an insult to them rather than seeing that a kid in high school sees the police in this way. So they attack the kid rather than the problem that this kid so clearly sees happening.