No one's DARED. ROTFLMAO! Like you're that significant! They don't DARE come after me, cause I'll shred them in court. I'm an inch away from mounting a Constitutional challenge to that there law. Guffaw!
and your arguments evaporate. The law, as it stands in the United States, isn't about what should be, or what is right. It is about what is written and past interpretations of that meaning. Period.
If the law was about what is right, people that make millions wouldn't be paying less tax than me. And O.J. wouldn't have gotten away with it the first time. And about 100 convicts in my state wouldn't have been convicted (and later had their convictions overturned) because of prosecutorial misconduct.
There's only one answer: Get your own lobbyist.
P.S. The definition of an honest judge (substitute alderman)in Chicago is one that stays bribed.
You just don't get it. That's why there are hundreds of thousands of very well paid lawyers. They get paid to write the laws for the lobbyists so that they will have a job getting paid for prosecuting, defending and judging cases based on that law. If the law wasn't about semantics and technicalities, it'd be mathematics, not law.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by chinese.bookie.