Actually, in the spirit of copyright law, they would need to uphold duplicates from the same source(copyright holder) and remove/disqualify duplicate or similar responses from individuals who could not reasonably prove that their response had not been influenced by said source.
You can see this when you log in to your computer using one password, check your email with another, and connect to facebook with yet a different password.
I use the same password for my computer as I do my email, bank account, AD domain at work, usenet, obscure and questionable hacking forums, random sites that I create an account to make one post with etc..
Those morons aren't likely to destroy us all directly, but rather indirectly by way of interference and distraction.
Solving the world's problems, or at least that which we naturally define as "problems" is far more likely to bring about destruction, as messed up as that is. See: Overpopulation.
The City of Seattle, including any officers, agents and employees thereof, are hereby permanently enjoined from disclosing, in response to any request under the Washington PRA, or otherwise, the… information that it has received from the FBI, absent the express authorization to do so by the FBI…
Doesn't this put the voluntary, unsolicited disclosure of the information outside the scope of the ruling?
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by biorpg.
Re: Re: Removing duplicates in e-text is easy
Actually, in the spirit of copyright law, they would need to uphold duplicates from the same source(copyright holder) and remove/disqualify duplicate or similar responses from individuals who could not reasonably prove that their response had not been influenced by said source.
Re: Conflating Authorization and Authentication
Re:
Those morons aren't likely to destroy us all directly, but rather indirectly by way of interference and distraction.
Solving the world's problems, or at least that which we naturally define as "problems" is far more likely to bring about destruction, as messed up as that is. See: Overpopulation.
Doesn't this put the voluntary, unsolicited disclosure of the information outside the scope of the ruling?