Leigh Beadon’s Techdirt Profile

leigh

About Leigh BeadonTechdirt Insider

Leigh Beadon, formerly Marcus Carab, now a full-time member of the Techdirt team.

Located in Toronto, Ontario.

http://twitter.com/MarcusCarab
http://soundcloud.com/marcus-carab

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/leigh-beadon/18/23a/5a2



Posted on Techdirt - 28 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the quotables dept

This week, officials in Nice reacted in the worst way possible by threatening to sue people sharing photos of the fashion police doing their anti-burka duty. Some of the conversation turned to refugees, and Uriel-238 won most insightful comment of the week by getting serious about things:

We decided that proper and reasonable treatment of refugees was important after the Napoleonic wars, and the standards for such treatment remain enshrined as a testament to humanity in the Geneva and Hague conventions.

Hospitality and fair treatment of refugees is not a duty that one nation owes to another nation, it's a duty that each of us, as individuals who benefit from national laws and identity, owe to all other individuals, considering that but for the grace of God (or your luck and fortune) you could also be outlawed by your own state and pushed out of its borders... or just executed and cremated in a mass oven.

Of course, thanks to George W. Bush's administration the Geneva Convention doesn't mean as much as it once did, and we will have to relearn why we created and ratified it in the first place.

So you can choose to vote against allowing refugees into your borders. You can choose to deny others sanctuary when their own have turned against them and the trains are getting packed and the ovens are on day and night.

But when fortune turns around, and it happens to you, or your grandchildren or your descendants down the line, when they become the persecuted, when the death camps are cooking once again, you had best hope that the people controlling those borders are kinder, more empathetic or more honorable than you are.

In second place, we've got an anonymous response to the airport stampede caused by applause mistaken for gunshots:

I guess this proves that despite 15 years of focus and nearly unlimited funding, the war on terror has not achieved its goal: the public in general is still terrified.

Arguably more so today than 15 years ago.

I'm aware that terrorists are still active, and yes, unfortunately they do at times succeed in attacking airports and other public areas. But I think too much (if not all) effort in that war on terror was focused on making a show of trying to find and stop the next terrorist (mission impossible), and not enough in reassuring the public.

When I'm scared, I don't want you to tear apart my bedroom and try to find the monster! I want you to acknowledge my fear, reassure me, and help me put things into context and perspective. I want to be informed in an open and rational way about the danger, without exaggerations or hidden agendas, so I can cope with it in my own way.

Instead, what the 'security theater' has done is actually reinforce the fears of the public beyond reason: Lots of noise. No perspective. No context. No open and transparent communication.

And I'm worried there may very well be a hidden agenda...

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with a comment from Derek Kerton calling the Copyright Alliance out on its at-best incomplete explanation of the purpose of copyright:

Incorrect

"copyright law is predicated on the theory that creators are incentivized to create new works by the prospect of reaping the economic fruits of their creative labor, which in turn benefits the public by increasing the number of creative works available for their enjoyment"

The objective is not so that the works are "available for our enjoyment", but rather that such works will eventually be fully ours, aka, Public Domain.

They act like the mid-state is the end game. It is not.

Next, after the EFF criticized Microsoft's lack of meaningful response to Windows 10 privacy concerns and one commenter accused them of relying on "second-hand knowledge", JMT wondered what other sort of knowledge they'd be able to have:

Which is kinda the whole point, since the first hand knowledge is being jealously guarded. When you mess with people's privacy but won't be up front about exactly what you're doing, expect to be called on it.

Over on the funny side, we start out on our post about Slate's really bad advice about running your own e-mail server, where we also pointed out that the comments were full of IT experts saying it was a bad idea. That One Guy won first place for funny by suggesting Slate solve this problem by jumping on a hot blogging trend:

Well, only one way to respond to that: Shut down the comments and claim that they're doing so because they care so much about their readers that they want to dump them elsewhere.

For second place, we return to the refugee debate, where sorrykb delivered a smackdown to any argument that boils down to everything being the refugees' fault:

Yeah. Stupid refugees should have been born into a wealthy stable country. What were they thinking.

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with a comment from Mark Wing discussing self-driving car fears that go beyond the trolley problem:

The real danger of automated cars is that they'll get hacked by Russians and drive you straight to a GOP rally.

And finally, after one anonymous commenter recently asked what happens to a lawyer who is found guilty of fraud perpetrated upon the court, another offered a perfect response:

He gets a job in Congress.

That's all for this week, folks!

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 27 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

This Week In Techdirt History: August 21st - 27th

from the earth-tremors dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2011, the mainstream press was waking up en masse to the fact that the patent system was terribly broken, with even the Wall Street Journal joining the fray. The patent system was, of course, getting in the way of health care, and attempts to convince Silicon Valley that software patents are great were unsurprisingly unsuccessful. Amidst all this the most notable patent battle going on was, of course, the one between Oracle and Google — and this was the week that we got our first whiff of the side-fight over API copyrights that would end up becoming so important.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2006, we had several early discussions about things that would grow to become major subjects of concern. There was the fact that content takedown laws were sneaking censorship into the traditionally censorship-proof internet; there was the RIAA following in DirecTV's footsteps and starting to automate the process of sending out mass copyright shakedown letters; and perhaps most perniciously, there was the quiet fallout of a Supreme Court ruling that told courts not to rush to issue injunctions over patent infringement: companies began exploiting the now-well-known "ITC Loophole" to route around the courts and ban a competitor's imports. Meanwhile, we all waited to see who would buy YouTube, and the platform's recent MySpace-esque branded offerings led us to incorrectly speculate that News Corp. might be the answer.

Fifteen Years Ago

This week in 2001, Windows XP was beginning its takeover of the PC scene. Bluetooth was all the trendy rage, but some were declaring it dead on arrival while others defended it — not that the world's wireless visionaries really had any idea what to expect (except, perhaps, more wi-fi security breaches). Oh, and remember when computers only came with one little branded sticker on the outside, proudly declaring the Intel processor and nothing else? That all started to change this week when IBM adopted the same strategy and opened the floodgates.

One-Hundred And Twenty-Eight Years Ago

Adding machines have a history that dates back to the 17th century, but they didn't really become useful and popular until the late 1800s. One of the two main trailblazers was the machine patented by William Seward Burroughs on August 25th, 1888. His company would go on to become what we know today as Unisys — and his grandson would become an author who helped define the beat generation.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 27 August 2016 @ 9:00am

Techdirt Gear: Copying Is Not Theft

from the t-shirts-and-more dept

Limited Time Offer:
Support Techdirt & get a Copying Is Not Theft t-shirt, hoodie or mug!

Yesterday, we launched our latest Techdirt gear design: Copying Is Not Theft, available on a variety of products. Men's and women's t-shirts are $20, hoodies are only $35, stickers are $4, and this time we've added v-necks and long-sleeve tees for $22 and mugs for $14. Help spread the word that whatever people think about copying and piracy, you won't swallow a false equivalency like "copying is theft".

Still not sold? Well, perhaps these computer-generated composites of photogenic people wearing the shirt can convince you:

Something cool must be going on over to the left.

Seriously, whatever's happening to the left must be just spellbinding.

WHAT IS GOING ON OVER THERE?

Also, after being challenged on Twitter, we decided it only makes sense to offer up the design for free as a vector SVG and a high-res PNG, just in case you want to steal copy it.

The Copying Is Not Theft gear is only available until Monday, September 5th so hurry up and order yours today!

12 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 26 August 2016 @ 12:58pm

Copying Is Not Theft! A New T-Shirt From Techdirt

from the false-equivalency dept

Limited Time Offer:
Support Techdirt & get a Copying Is Not Theft t-shirt, hoodie or mug!

We've said it a million times, even as the copyright industries continue to ignore it: copying is not theft. When you steal something, you take it away from someone else; when you copy something, the original is unharmed and nobody is deprived. We know most people here at Techdirt understand that message, and now you can shout it out with our new Copying Is Not Theft t-shirt and hoodie.

In addition to our usual offering of men's and women's t-shirts for $20 and hoodies for $35, we're trying out some new products for this design. There are long-sleeve t-shirts and men's and women's v-necks for $22, and mugs for $14 (plus, like last time, stickers!) If any of these options prove popular we'll strive to offer them with other designs in the future, so vote with your wallet.

One more thing: in the spirit of copying, we're also making the artwork available as a vector SVG and a high-res PNG, just in case you want to print out a poster, make your own gear, remix it somehow, or anything else like that.

The Copying Is Not Theft gear is only available until Monday, September 5th so hurry up and order yours today!

27 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 23 August 2016 @ 1:00pm

Techdirt Podcast Episode 87: An Interview With Kim Dotcom's Lawyer

from the from-the-front-lines dept

Ira Rothken is a lawyer on the front lines of many major legal battles relating to copyright and piracy, including defending Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom and, most recently, taking up the defense of Kickass Torrents operator Artem Vaulin. This week, Ira joins us on the podcast to discuss the ins and outs of these and other cases where the entertainment industry has come down hard on consumers and innovators.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

11 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 21 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the insecurity dept

This week there was a lot of reaction to the DNC's creation of a Cybersecurity Board that doesn't include a single cybersecurity expert, and both our first place comments (as well as a couple editor's choices) came in response to that post. On the insightful side, the top comment came from an anonymous commenter who asserts some personal experience in the DNC's failure to consider the right candidates:

Yes, there are. I'm one of them. (30+ years experience at multiple Fortune 500 companies and several major universities. Spent the last eight years building and defending a medical database system that grew from 10's of gigabytes to half a petabyte. And so on.) I applied for the open security expert position at the DNC and heard nothing back. Not even a "no thank you". Nothing.

And with all due respect to these folks: now is not the time to craft policy. That's a lengthy and careful debate. Now is the time to deploy systems that are as secure as possible given time constraints -- noting that there's an election in three months and that something that solves 90% of the problems for 90 days is better than something that solves 99% of the problems but won't be operational until 2018.

In second place on the insightful side we've got another anonymous comment, this time in response to the fact that there may be a third Oracle/Google copyright trial over the Java API:

At this point, why would anyone use Java or Oracle for any project?

Seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start with a comment from John Fenderson, who brought up an excellent semantic point that explains Comcast's "Premium" offerings:

You're just reading the wrong definition. "Premium" meaning "high quality" is the third definition in my dictionary. The first is "An amount paid over and above the regular price".

I think Comcast is going with the first.

Next, we head back to the DNC's Cybersecurity Board, where CanadianByChoice suggested the lack of expertise was by design:

This was the only way they could be reasonably certain that the Advisory Board would give the advice they want to hear.

Over on the funny side, Blaine took first place with his own encouraging message for the DNC:

I'm sure they can do it.

The politicians just need to politician harder!

For second place, we head to our post about the news that PayPal blocked a payment simply because the memo included the word "Cuba", which made one anonymous commenter wonder who suffered the most:

Cuba Gooding Jr. must HATE PayPal.

I mean, way more than the average person does.

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out on our post about DirecTV's latest dirty dealings, where YakkoWarner knew the real solution was all that wonderful consumer choice:

Yeah, they'd be much better off signing up with one of their many competi-- um....

Finally, we return one last time to the DNC's Cybersecurity Board, where one final anonymous commenter saw the silver lining in a cybersecurity board with no cybersecurity:

Well, perhaps its better this way. It leads to a more transparent government body...

That's all for this week, folks!

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 20 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

This Week In Techdirt History: August 14th - 20th

from the time-passes dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2011, the MPAA got hilariously and incoherently angry about a GigaOm post pointing out that file sharing continues to grow. After we criticized their response, they came back yet again with a string of empty "sharing is theft" arguments — and TorrentFreak couldn't help but notice that some of the criticisms applied to similar things the MPAA itself had said not long before.

Meanwhile, police were busy hating photographers — both those that film the police themselves and those that take snapshots of things with, uh, no aesthetic value... apparently. Some people were defending the UK's attempts to fight riots by shutting down social media, as UK cops got in on the act by shutting down a social-media-organized... water gun fight. All the while, new research showed that trying to stop protests with internet censorship just creates more protests.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2006, the RIAA was oh-so-friendly when it decided to delay one of its lawsuits by 60 days. Why? The target of the lawsuit died, and the agency wanted his family to have some time to grieve before they were deposed. After this got a bunch of (negative) attention, they actually had the gall to use the phrase "abundance of sensitivity" when they caved and dropped the lawsuit outright. Hollywood was continuing to drive file sharing further underground, there was a copyright fight over copy protection on VHS tapes, and Jack Thompson was demanding a pre-release copy of the new game Bully so he could pre-emptively freak out about it (even more than he already had).

Fifteen Years Ago

This week in 2001, a group of judges who recently objected to monitoring software on their computers were rebuffed, a group of Mac-loving students rebelled against their school's choice to go PC, and a Thai newspaper started flipping out about the generalized (and mostly made-up) dangers of computers in general. Though pop-ups were already a target of general hatred, the notion of full-length TV-style video ads on websites was a novel and questionable one (with the hatred already clearly visible on the horizon). And one company was out there bizarrely trying to help people copyright their DNA to protect against unwanted cloning.

One-Hundred And Thirty-One Years Ago

When we talk about patent history here on Techdirt, we're usually pretty focused on the US, but this week we can mark an important date for Japan's system. On August 14th, 1885, Japan granted its first seven official patents under the well-named Patent Monopoly Act. Number 1 was for anticorrosive paint, and numbers 2-4 were for tea processing machines.

1 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 20 August 2016 @ 9:00am

Awesome Stuff: A Recycling 3D Pen

from the repurposed-plastic dept

Three years ago, the 3Doodler pen became a huge hit on Kickstarter, and for a brief period it seemed like these handheld 3D printing tools might be the next big gadget. But after that initial rush, they never fully took off, and not everyone was satisfied with the performance of the pen itself. Nevertheless, the idea is a compelling one, so for this week's Awesome Stuff we're taking a look at an interesting new offering with an important twist: the Renegade pen.

So what's the key innovation that makes the Renegade interesting? Simple: instead of feeding off of normal 3D printer filament, it prints by recycling the material from any old plastic bottle.

Normal 3D printing is a slow, precise process — most pieces are thoroughly designed and tested in digital form, and iterated as little as possible in printed physical form. But 3D drawing with a freehand pen is a much looser exercise: it's only fun if you can experiment and mess around, and that burns through a whole lot of filament. The Renegade comes with a special cutting tool that lets you quickly and easily cut any bottle into long strips of plastic that feed into the pen, replacing expensive filament and diverting some garbage to a more useful purpose. It can also work with plastic shopping bags and other odds and ends like plastic file folders.

The creators have a working prototype, but of course it remains to be seen just how satisfying and fun it will be to use once it's actually in your hands — 3D pens probably still have a little ways to go before they are truly viable as a general-use tool or toy. But if you're interested in the technology and want a chance to try it out, the Renegade might just be the smartest and most cost effective way to do so.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 16 August 2016 @ 1:00pm

Techdirt Podcast Episode 86: Have Platforms Killed The Open Internet By Replacing Protocols?

from the open,-close dept

The internet is built on a solid foundation of open protocols: TCP/IP, HTTP and SMTP especially, plus more modern entrants like RSS and BitTorrent. But even those aren't so new anymore, and it seems like the era of the open protocol might be coming to an end, supplanted by the drive to create proprietary closed platforms. This week, we discuss whether the open protocol is dead, and what that means for the future of the open internet.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

7 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 14 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the incumbent-panic dept

This week, the Association of American Publishers started complaining about Sci-Hub and tossing around stock concerns about "intellectual property". Mason Wheeler won first place for insightful by honing in on the difference between IP and copyright:

Intellectual property is not the point of copyright; it's the mechanism of copyright, the means it uses to accomplish its purpose, which is to encourage people to create useful things and bring them to the public domain.

When a mechanism starts doing things that run counter to its purpose, we declare it "broken" and either throw it out or take it to a specialist to repair it.

Meanwhile, we were expressing concerns about the rise of discussion around the supposed "value gap" in online music services, and TheResidentSkeptic won second place for insightful with a redefinition of the term:

The "Value Gap" they need to be concerned about is the one between what they value their content at and what consumers value it at.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, first we've got one more response to that post, this time from aerinai focusing on the specific ridiculousness of complaining about a choice in platforms:

What I don't understand is, if YouTube is not valuable to them, then they have the choice to not put their music on YouTube. ContentID gives them the freedom to restrict OTHERS from doing the same with their content... So how can you yell "This service is not making me enough money! Its not even worth it to have our content on here!" and yet simultaneously still keep your music on it.... If they want better terms, start their own site and pay others what they think is an appropriate rate... but that takes work, so nahhhhh.....

And yet another industry was getting mad this week — the newspaper industry was complaining about John Oliver's failure to solve all their problems. That Anonymous Coward experienced some deja vu:

Gee an out of touch industry that ignored things were changing, and expect others to fix their problems... Where have I seen this before??

Over on the funny side, the first place comment comes in response to the EFF's call for a truth-in-labelling law for products with DRM. The idea has some merit, however Inwoods couldn't help but be immediately suspicious of one of the examples offered in justification:

"Adam J installed Microsoft’s Groove"

Bullshit. No one in the history of the internet has ever done that.

In second place, we've got another response to the fight between newspapers and John Oliver, this time from an anonymous commenter who joined the many people confused by Tribune's recent rebranding:

tronc? Isn't that what you give to a dead horse so it doesn't feel anything when you flog it?

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with one final response to that post from an anonymous commenter who saw the whole thing as something of a death rattle:

You know when an industry is in trouble when they want comedians to give them business strategies.

Finally, we head to the amazingly-not-over fight about the infamous monkey selfie. After a primatologist defended the the supposed copyright on the grounds that Macaques are super smart, Gumnos wondered if turnabout was fair play:

Does the opposite apply?

“Your honor, these representatives for {PETA,big media} are really, really dumb, so we move to declare their copyrights as void…”

That's all for this week, folks!

Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 13 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

This Week In Techdirt History: August 7th - 13th

from the slightly-shorter-than-usual-edition dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2011, London was caught in widespread rioting, and naturally some officials were quick to place the blame squarely on... BlackBerry, since messaging and Twitter were being used to incite and organize rioters. One MP went as far as to call on BlackBerry to shut down its messenger service (as if that would help), and then Prime Minister David Cameron decided it might be good to ban suspected rioters from social media. They sure did handle it well, huh?

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2006, Sony was continuing its proud tradition of utterly failing when it comes to DRM, this time deciding to delay the launch of the audio/video download store for the PSP because they couldn't implement the copy protection in time. All the customer backlash against bad DRM seemed to be prompting other DRM-pushers to start changing their story. And then of course there was the battleground for the next generation of DRM media: the fight to replace DVDs with a new emerging standard was just heating up (and would evolve into the Blu-ray/HD-DVD wars, and eventually today's Blu-ray supremacy).

Fifteen Years Ago

Five years before that in 2001, copy protected CDs were a relatively new idea and it was still unclear how pervasive and protected they were. Meanwhile, the DOJ was starting to investigate the online music services that the recording industry set up (in the wake of said industry's destruction of several independent online music companies). We also saw a decision that would change the face of two giant brands: a judge told the World Wrestling Federation that it had to stop using "WWF", and hand wwf.com over to the World Wildlife Fund.

Seventy-Two Years Ago

Some of the earliest computers were put to work in World War Two, and among the most famous is IBM's Automatic Sequence Controlled Calculator — better known as the Harvard Mark I, after it was officially presented to the university on August 24th, 1944. It was described as having "brought Babbage’s principles of the Analytical Engine almost to full realization, while adding important new features."

Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 13 August 2016 @ 9:00am

Awesome Stuff: Time Is Running Out For Two Techdirt T-Shirts!

from the tick-tock dept

Normally we only have one t-shirt available at a time, but thanks to a big order that rebooted one of our Teespring campaigns, this weekend there are two to choose from! First, there's our new Vote2016() t-shirt, which is only available until Monday night:

Then there's also our highly popular Takedown t-shirt, which is available only until tomorrow night:

As usual, in addition to men's and women's t-shirts for $20, we've got hoodies at the low price of $35. For the Vote2016() design, you can also pick up a high-quality sticker! After these campaigns end, we can't be sure when they'll relaunch — so hurry up and grab your Vote2016() t-shirt or your Takedown t-shirt (or both!)

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt Podcast - 9 August 2016 @ 1:04pm

Techdirt Podcast Episode 85: Is Your Algorithm Racist?

from the and-what-can-be-done-about-it? dept

Algorithms have become a powerful force in the world, but for all the impressive good they do, they sometimes show some worrying tendencies. Algorithms that discriminate are a problem that nobody's found a solution for yet. This week, we discuss why some algorithms appear to be racist, and whether there's anything that can be done about it.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

11 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 7 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the say-it-again dept

This week, we noted how the stupid ban on Olympic tweets was harming athletes, and expressed hope that someone would fight back against the IOC. Jason won most insightful comment of the week by suggesting things go a step further:

Or, while we're dreaming, how about hoping we just give the IOC what it really seems to want, and no one talk, post, tweet, watch, or think about the Olympics anywhere, ever?

In second place for insightful, we have michael with a personal-experience response to the surprising study showing internet trolls are even worse when they aren't anonymous:

I also thought trolls hid behind anonymity. But then I joined NextDoor, which is like Facebook for your neighborhood or community.

The open racism, confrontational attitudes, and flagrant trolling by neighbors I'd never met (and I live in a pretty close-knit community) and whose name and address are prominently displayed on the site was shocking.

Turns out it's not the anonymity; it's just that some people are assholes.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with another response to the Olympics' various stupid and questionable bans, where Whoever pointed out some of the legal intricacies:

Treaty is quite explicit, and limited.

In second place on the funny side,

The Nairobi treaty defines trademark protection for the Olympics. The interesting thing about this treaty and its implementation under US law is that it is limited to a small number of marks, and many that the USOC or the IOC claim people cannot use are simply not included in the treaty and law. For example "Rio" is not protected:

2. Which Olympic trademarks are protected in the United States?

The Olympic trademarks protected by U.S. statute (36 U.S.C. § 220506(c)) include the name “UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE”; the symbol of the IOC, consisting of five interlocking rings; the words “Olympic,” “Olympiad” and “Citius Altius Fortius,” and also the words “Paralympic,” “Paralympiad,” “Pan-American” and “America Espirito Sport Fraternite,” or any combination of these words; the emblem of the United States Olympic Committee, consisting of an escutcheon having a blue chief and vertically extending red and white bars on the base with five interlocking rings displayed on the chief; and the symbols of the International Paralympic Committee and the Pan-American Sports Organization, consisting of a torch surrounded by concentric rings.
http://www.inta.org/TrademarkBasics/FactSheets/Pages/ProtectionofOlympicTrademarks.aspx
https:/ /www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/220506

Next, we've got an anonymous response to the fact that even the RIAA's usual defenders were pointing out that it's lying about YouTube piracy:

Yet more evidence that piracy is merely the excuse that the legacy content industries uses to attack those that allow publishing without going through them, by trying to make a legal case against them. They cannot attack the individual self publishing content creators, as they are too numerous, but they can attack those who facilitate self publishing.

That same post is the source of our first place winner on the funny side. After one commenter showed up making broad and bizarre assertions about "regulation", another anonymous commenter couldn't resist mimicking his jumbled and repetitive approach:

Let me see if I understand what you're saying.
Regulation regulates regulations, but regulations are relegated to regulating the regulators. So, if we want to regulate the regulation of regulators, we have to put regulations into place that will regulate regulating regulations?
Do I have that right?

In second place on the funny side, we've got an analogy from MDT in response to the Manhattan DA's latest demands for encryption backdoors-but-we-won't-call-them-that:

We are not saying that every safe should have a second door on it. We are only asking for every safe manufactured to have a fixed combination that is given to the police for use when we need it. We will absolutely guard this police combination that opens all safes, and we will not allow criminals to have it. We will make it illegal for anyone other than police to use it, which will make it secure and safe and ensure no one but the 'good guys' can use that bypass combination code.

For editor's choice on the funny side, we've got another analogy for the DA, this time from an anonymous commenter and much more straightforward:

We're not saying we want 1+1 to = 3, but does it always have to = 2? I'm sure the smart mathematicians could come up with something if they really wanted to.

Finally, we head to our post about one Minnesota carpet cleaning company that did fight back against the Olympics, where we noted that the IOC had overstepped its legal boundaries, and Ryunosuke suggested a more appropriate phrasing:

and by "overstepped their legal boundaries" you meant pole hurdled, triple jumped, and pole vaulted over it, right?

That's all for this week, folks!

8 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 6 August 2016 @ 12:00pm

This Week In Techdirt History: July 31st - August 6th

from the the-more-things-change dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2011, we saw the surprising ruling that MegaUpload could be guilty of direct infringement in a lawsuit brought by Perfect 10. Another court shut down online movie rental site Zediva, establishing the bizarre fact that the length of the cable apparently makes a difference when it comes to infringement. On the flipside, in another Perfect 10 case, we got the excellent and important ruling that copyright infringement doesn't automatically mean irreparable harm.

In the UK, the copyright world was in flux following the Hargreaves Report, with the UK Business Secretary stepping up to back many of its recommendations and even go beyond them. Soon, the UK announced surprisingly good copyright plans based on the report — though it didn't address ridiculous copyright term lengths. At the same time, BPI was using a ruling against Newzbin2 to push for much broader copyright censorship powers, while the UK's pioneering copyright trolls were facing sanctions.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2006, inspired by the success of YouTube, the big media companies were racing to crowd the market for video sharing platforms with their own official offerings, creating a huge mess. MSN was actually a leader in the online video space, but it wasn't clear if that really mattered. DVRs were sort of changing how much TV people watch, and digital filming was changing how actors act.

Also this week in 2006: Norway was considering banning iTunes, Germany was trying to stop software resale, and a Minnesota ban on selling video games to minors was declared unconstitutional; the music industry was ironically starting to see CDs as a threat while also trying to sell people music on DVDs for some reason; and, following a semi-victory in the Grokster decision, the RIAA officially commenced its legal action against Limewire.

Fifteen Years Ago

This week in 2001, the music labels were excited about their new digital music plans even though it was easy to predict that they wouldn't work out that well. Of course, popular piracy alternatives had big problems too, such as KaZaa installing browser-hijacking adware as a business model and leading to an awareness of the plague of "parasite-ware". DVRs were already changing people's viewing habits back in 2001, and one company was already working on a 3D television — except it turned out to be a complete hoax.

Three-Hundred And Thirteen Years Ago

We often talk about free speech and satire around here at Techdirt, so this week let's look back at an iconic moment in the history of those concepts. It was on July 31st, 1703 that novelist and pamphleteer Daniel Defoe (of Robinson Crusoe fame) was arrested and put in the pillory for distributing a satirical pamphlet, on charges of seditious libel. Legend has it the people pelted him not with fruits but with flowers — but the truth of this is shaky at best.

Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 6 August 2016 @ 9:00am

Awesome Stuff: Don't Miss Our New Vote2016() T-Shirt

from the syntax-politics dept

Limited time offer: Support Techdirt and get a Vote2016() t-shirt or hoodie!

Yesterday, we launched our latest t-shirt/hoodie on Teespring: a common sentiment about the 2016 election expressed in code:

It's only available until Monday, August 15th so be sure to order yours soon! T-shirts are $20, hoodies are only $35, and this time we've also added a sticker option for $4. Support Techdirt and get your Vote2016() gear today!

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 2 August 2016 @ 1:00pm

Techdirt Podcast Episode 84: Is It The 'Pokemon' Or The 'Go' That Matters?

from the killer-app-or-one-hit-wonder? dept

Pokémon Go is an undeniable phenomenon, and the first mass-appeal hit from the world of augmented reality — a technology people have been expecting would transform gaming for years. That leaves a big question, though: is its popularity a sign of the future for AR, or is the game an isolated phenomenon that owes more to the popularity of its brand? This week, we discuss what we can learn from Pokémon Go, and whether we can truly learn anything at all.

Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 31 July 2016 @ 12:00pm

Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the vax-attacks dept

This week, Yahoo was facing accusations that it wasn't entirely honest about its ability to recover communications that it claimed were deleted. That Anonymous Coward won first place for insightful by expanding on the problems with the situation:

Parallel construction should never be acceptable. To violate any alleged protections citizens have, and then build a fantasy way to explain how they obtained it to hide the actual source seems to be an affront to Justice.

But then we let court officers lie with no downside, Judges refuse to shame prosecutors who violate the law in order to secure a conviction against someone they knew was innocent, they throw out all the rules to get the bad guy and when caught they dismiss cases rather than admit what they are doing is wrong.

This isn't how the legal system is supposed to work, and its looking like the rot has spread to far for us to save it. No bandaid is going to fix this, we need to cut out the bad parts to save the system.

Meanwhile, after we made the point that the content of the leaked DNC emails is relevant and important regardless of whether or not it was Russians who obtained them, one anonymous commenter won second place for insightful by agreeing wholeheartedly:

I've been yelling this article's point at my computer screen all weekend. If the DNC hadn't done nefarious shit and communicated about it over an insecure medium, there'd be nothing for whoever, Russian-sponsored or otherwise, to hack and release! This is shooting the messenger - the same way Edward Snowden was blamed for endangering Americans when it was the illegal and nefarious actions by the government that he exposed that had done that.

I don't care if the email leaks came from Satan himself. If the content is factual, it's relevant.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start with another aspect of the DNC email hack: the claims by the party that Wikileaks is full of malware. Mcinsand pulled out the political dictionary:

translation

Apparently, 'malware' is a new term for inconvenient truths.

Next, we've got a response to the defamation threats from an anti-vax film distributor trying to squash criticism, which will be the source of both of our top winners on the funny side. But before that, PaulT offered an excellent summary of anti-vax psychology, and why it's not all just about pure stupidity:

There's 2 things at play here. One is ignorance, of course. The other thing is the thing that's harder to deal with, and the thing that these anti-vaxxers are deliberately altering for the worse - perception.

In my parents' era, it was easy to see the benefits of vaccines, and the dangers on not having them. Smallpox was real, measles was killing people and most knew people who had suffered and been disabled by polio (my uncle's right arm was useless from a young age from the disease). Meanwhile autism was a relatively new diagnosis and wasn't properly understood.

Fast forward to today - smallpox is dead, destroyed by vaccination. Nobody really knows anyone who's suffered with diseases like polio, while things like measles have been weakened so that it's often lumped in with less dangerous diseases. Measles is an inconvenience in the minds of parents who haven't been exposed to the scarring, blindness and death a strain can cause. However, they are well aware of autism and most likely know people who have been diagnosed somewhere on the spectrum.

This is why anti-vaxxer propaganda is so dangerous. It preys on the fears of parents who are scared their child might be autistic, but are ignorant of the very real dangers that come with lower levels of vaccination. The biggest problem is that even discredited frauds like Wakefield and outdated talking points like mercury in vaccines can somehow convince some people better than verifiable science.

But enough of the dry analysis — first place for funny goes to Vidiot, who illustrated the backfire that comes with frivolous defamation threats like these:

Like a Warner Bros. cartoon

Lesson number one: When you load up the defamation cannon, you can probably expect that the biggest explosion won't be coming out of the front end.

In second place, we've got Dale Evans, who saw right through our ploy:

PR firm propaganda, paid for by Big Pharma $$$

Nice propaganda effort, this article, web page, and the fake comments included. Shows you what Big Pharma profits $$$$ can purchase in the way of public relations firm services. Pretty convincing. Very God-less and immoral. These PR firms should be shut down and their staff sent to prison!

For editor's choice on the funny side, we head to the news that Russia's state internet censor accidentally blocked its own security certificate authority and took down its own website, where we have two quick-and-dirty jokes in response. First, it's Berenerd wondering what the problem is:

Seems like its working as it should, blocking those bad propaganda sites

And last but not least, it's Lord Lidl of Cheem (lord who of where?) with a slightly tortured but still amusing twist on a classic:

In Soviet Russia, site ban bans ban.

That's all for this week, folks!

22 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 30 July 2016 @ 12:00pm

This Week In Techdirt History: July 24th - 30th

from the changes dept

Five Years Ago

This week in 2011, we saw a variety of studies and other sources pushing back against the common "wisdom" on copyright and piracy. People were beginning to point to the signs that weaker copyright can encourage cultural output, that piracy can actually increase the quality of content, that pirates are the best consumers, and that file sharing is good for artists.

Of course, on the flipside, we saw the idea/expression dichotomy gutted when a judge allowed a photographer to sue Rihanna. PayPal agreed to help cut sites off at the behest of the IFPI, a UK court ordered a telecom to block sites at Hollywood's behest, and the music industry was pushing for infringement red flags in Google search results.

Ten Years Ago

This week in 2006, Kazaa began walking down the Napster road of going straight (and becoming irrelevant). Meanwhile Metallica, author of Napster's destruction, was finally accepting that fans want music online, and entering the iTunes store. TorrentSpy was trying to fend off Hollywood, the RIAA was dropping cases over the fact that an IP address is not a person, the industry was cracking down on karaoke bars, and amidst so much dastardly piracy, the Pirates of the Caribbean sequel was still thriving. YouTube was changing the way people interact with television, and gimmicky technology was changing the way people interact with a game of Monopoly.

Fifteen Years Ago

This week in 2001, still fresh off the heels of Napster's destruction, it was bizarre to see Metallica's website boasting about their love of "sharing" music. Some people were predicting that all the Napster copycats cropping up in its wake would soon be dead thanks to more effective copyright schemes (and though many of the clones did die, music piracy lives on...) The folks in DC were apparently very happy with the DMCA despite its increasingly obvious problems, most notably last week's arrest of a hacker that went over so poorly Adobe started backing down. But perhaps the most noticeable way technology was changing the entertainment industry was naturally, from the inside out: a lot of cliche movie plots were rendered nonsensical by things like cellphones, and TV news and sports broadcasts were undergoing a drastic webification.

Seventy-Six Years Ago

There's a lot of talk about Mickey Mouse in the copyright world, but this week we can celebrate a competing character who also evades the public domain thanks to copyright extension: Bugs Bunny, who was introduced in the short A Wild Hare on July 27, 1940. (The all-time classic Bugs short What's Opera, Doc? would have entered the public domain two years ago were it not for the 1976 Copyright Act.)

Leave a Comment..

Posted on Techdirt - 30 July 2016 @ 9:00am

Awesome Stuff: Not Much Time Left To Get A Takedown T-Shirt!

from the tick-tock dept

Last week, we launched our latest t-shirt (and hoodie!) on Teespring: the Takedown tee. Now the campaign is nearly at an end, so if you want one you've only got until Monday, August 1st at 8:00pm PT. Otherwise you'll have to wait for the campaign to restart, which could happen soon or it could take ages — so don't delay!

Men's and women's t-shirts are $20, hoodies are only $35, and everything's available in a variety of colors. Hurry up and get yours today!

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

More posts from Leigh Beadon >>