'Dubious' Copyright Claim That Took Down Drone Footage Of Football Stadium Not All That Dubious, But Still Isn't The Optimal Solution

from the rights-holder-bot-claims-upteenth-victim dept

Bogus YouTube takedowns? We’ve seen our share of those. So, when this arrived in the Techdirt submission box from one of our readers, I wasn’t very surprised.

Over the past several weeks, an unidentified quadcopter owner has been flying over Kyle Field at Texas A&M shooting videos of the stadium as it undergoes massive renovations. Texas A&M University forced youtube to block the quadcopter videos over a copyright claim. The claim is (at best) dubious. The videos are posted for free, the school is a state school, and all shots are of outdoor objects. Perhaps the school believes that A&M logos located on and around the stadium are somehow subject to copyright. (via this link)

That could very well be. Entities often issue bogus takedown notices and cease and desists, often becoming the real “morons in a hurry” by conflating copyright and trademark in their hurry to flex their ownership. Even if the logos were protected, they would be covered under trademark law, rather than copyright. That’s not to say YouTube videos can’t be taken down for trademark violations, but it would be a rather unusual situation.

The video that no longer exists states clearly that it has been removed due to a “copyright claim by Texas A&M University.” If Texas A&M was that assertive about its logos or making some bogus claim about owning the airspace over the stadium, it certainly would have at least tried to remove another video posted by the same account containing the same sort of footage. But it didn’t.

And there’s where we find our first indication that this takedown has nothing to do with trademark or A&M’s physical property. In the comments, this exchange takes place.


If you can’t see or read the screenshot it says the following:

Commenter: Should have had music provide by the Fight’n Texas Aggie Band.

Matt Burger (account owner): Look at the first video/photo slideshow. Right in your wheelhouse

This suggests the background music in the first (now removed) video may have featured Texas A&M’s creations. A tweet by Matt Burger (creator of the drone footage) seems to confirm this.


If you can’t see this, it says:

When editing it’s hard to choose. Pick the song that sounds like a 90’s montage, or the well known song that will violate copyright. #grind

So, it would appear that Texas A&M’s copyright claim was all about the music and had nothing to do with what the drone recorded. While it would have been a bit kinder of A&M to simply have the soundtrack muted rather than kill the video entirely, that’s entirely decided by presets on the college’s end of the YouTube world, something that isn’t going to be applied on a case-by-case basis. Goodbye, Burger’s drone footage. And, like so many other cases involving both YouTube and other IP owners, goodbye fair use. That’s what happens when algorithms do all the thinking.

This takedown wasn’t abusive but it’s still a long way from the most desirable outcome. Texas A&M shutting down a video taken by an incredibly loyal fan isn’t really a win for anybody.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: texas a&m

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “'Dubious' Copyright Claim That Took Down Drone Footage Of Football Stadium Not All That Dubious, But Still Isn't The Optimal Solution”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
14 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

“This takedown wasn’t abusive but it’s still a long way from the most desirable outcome. Texas A&M shutting down a video taken by an incredibly loyal fan isn’t really a win for anybody.”

He admits himself it’s not a story. It wasn’t an abusive take down. Cushing just wanted to attack the school.

pixelpusher220 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

uh, no. It’s pointing out how this was a ‘valid’ copyright claim…something you’d want TD to do I’m guessing. It’s also showing that the ‘hammer’ approach isn’t the optimal solution to these issues.

As for not being abusive, I’d disagree with Tim…it is abusive, which is how the DMCA was written. It’s just ‘legally’ abusive.

The Wanderer (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

From my reading of the story, it looks like the school (or their representatives) did write the song, or at least had the copyright assigned to them by whoever did.

(Of course, to completely verify that would require knowing what the original music of the original video was, so that its copyright ownership can be tracked down – and AFAIK that’s not mentioned in this article or any of its links.)

You might disagree about whether it should be possible for someone other than the original creator (songwriter) to own the copyright to the song, but the fact is that under current US law it is possible.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...