I do think there is a portion of them that are like that yes much like there are incredibly chauvinist women (yes, you read right). But I don't think we should let this very loud minority invalidate the whole, justified cause.
I'd be promptly fired if I had an accuracy rate like that. The problem is that the police and the courts suffer absolutely no loss from the dogs being very unreliable. With that in mind it's easy to say that a 10% accuracy rate is enough...
Re: It seems sexual because I as a human being am pretty sexually biased.
I actually think that suggestive things are actually what makes sex so great. I mean, obviously the act itself is awesome but what leads to it and/or suggests it is also amazing.
Other than that I do think we need more things like that paint focused on women in general. I personally don't know what would be a suggestive alternative to a girl savoring an ice cream in a sensual way but with a guy so that's a job for the creative girls out there. But it would be interesting to see a more even playing field there.
You are treting it as murder because you believe in the concept of a soul. Scientifically this cannot be proven. Yet. So we are not talking about murder. You can and should discuss how to allow it without causing suffering but you cannot make it illegal. Ie: allow it before a nervous system is in place. Besides, even illegal, there will be people doing it. Better make it legal and avoid the clandestine butchers we see when it's outlawed.
Make them have the last standard. For their household. As for their staffers have they share 4 mbit with the same number an average household has. Ie: every 4 staffers get 4 mbit. Do it with their mobile connections too. I'd bet this would change pretty quickly.
I like my things dumb. I mean, we are striving to save every single minute of our time by automating a bunch of things (a tea kettle, really) and we are forgetting to live. Who ever brewed their own tea/coffee know that brewing is part of the experience.
We should be looking for having more free time to spend yes. But we are doing it wrong.
It's an addiction. The ineffectiveness can be hid under cases produced via fishing expeditions. Considering how they care not with any civil rights at all we'll see plenty of innocent people thrown under the bus to justify their budget.
They are tissues. Period. The meat that comes out cannot live separated from the mother. It is not an independent life. So yes, they are tissues. You may have your religious views but they do not combine with a secular Government. You should yes do like me and try to dissuade those wanting to try an abortion (I'm Cathoilic) but you DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON OTHERS. Maybe we should make the prayer at noon turned to Mecca a law, yes?
It is amusing that a law is allowed to live with most of its core objectives slashed out. Still, THANK GOD this happened. Section 230 is instrumental in protecting innovation. If you want proof it is that important see the MAFIAA complaining about it...
And unlike many people you seem to be unable to understand that Zuckeberg's idea is bad because it will both provide a fake, censored version of the internet for the Indians AND put a major monopoly in Facebook's hands.
India is perhaps one of the most backward counties when it comes to human rights and equality. It's really a good idea to follow their models and choices, right Karl?
Let me Godwin it once again: The 3rd Reich was an absolute disaster in terms of Human Rights and yet had pretty good animal protection laws. Maybe we should ignore that and keep letting animals be abused, you know, because Hitler was bad? Then again, this is your lack of ability to see nuances showing yet again.
Re: "No one needs that much, no one will ever use it!"
That. Besides, they forget that nowadays you are not only watching netflix OR surfing the net, using social networks OR playing games. I'm often doing all three at the same time (if you consider skype and the likes as social network anyway). So 25 mbit may be a bit too low for a household with more than one person. And the 3mbit limit is simply laughable when you consider people upload their generated content to youtube and the likes very often. And often with incredibly high resolutions.
Even if you ignore all that, who is he to tell me what I need? What if I just want high speeds to load things blazing fast and don't wait for a download?