The New Yorker is expressing a view that I hold to be extreme(ist). Extremist content isn't valuable content and doesn't hold any worth. Any content that doesn't hold 'worth' can be silenced without any issue or loss. Therefore the New Yorker can and should be silenced.
I agree. The worth of a paper should be determined by the party in power, and anyone expressing an alternate opinion, should be silenced. They should be jailed, their assets seized, and their children forbidden from ever holding a position in government.
Damn, that sounds like what our government does on a daily basis, to people who do not follow their carefully crafted narrative, or who fall out of favor.
I wonder if anyone working at newspapers worries about things like that?
This is a good thing, Just like China Clamping down on the Internet
What this means is that the EU is destined for failure. You regulate out competition and advancement, you regulate out the ability to compete. Let them be self defeating, let them create their own demise, let them be a leading indicator of what will come, so we in the US can adapt.
Matt Stone To Silicon Valley: Screw You Guys, I'm Going Hulu
Silicon Valley To Matt Stone: Enjoy the kool aid...
Please note: You contract does not cover, various forms of streaming not mentioned in the contract, licencing on VR platforms, BCI (Brain Computer Interfaces), Memory Implants, Personal Memory uploads, etc. It also includes licencing payment exceptions for, but not limited to, foreign nations, other worlds, in earth orbit, and 300 plus other loosely worded exceptions.