People like you make me sick. Pure cowardice, just rolling over like a chicken shit when authority looks in your direction.
It's okay in your book for government to hunt people down, murder them, jail them for years without trial and that is rational, but it's not rational for a citizen to seek liberty in response to a government breaking the law by ignoring the constitution?
The founding fathers started a revolution for less. Consider that historical fact Mr. Rational.
Tell me, at which point will you be willing to fight for the safety of your child? Apparently you are fine with government taking them away without question. You suck as a parent!
The trouble with this idea is not really the idea.. This *could* be done just fine. Depending on the implementation, many of the problems that cause the current copyright system to be such a net drain *could* be fixed. The lack of accountability on the copyright holder, the ridiculous "damages" that can be awarded, the jurisdiction shopping.. The trouble is because we know the state of regulatory capture in this area, you can kindof predict that the details are going to make things worse instead of better
It's not the number that is important but the content.
Nice flimsy rationalization. (And yes, I know that InfoWars claims that it's more than that.)
and tells members of law enforcement to stop enforcing law
Deferred action. How dare Obama do what Reagan and Bush I had previously done, and what Bush II had called for.
Not to be confused with full immigration amnesty, which Reagan did for 3.2 million illegal immigrants. (Remember his "Shining House on the Hill" speech about opening the borders to all?) And which the Republican platform committee made part of the Republican platform in 2004. Or which GOP conservatives pushed for around the same time (via the AgJOBS bill).
Heck, even more recent Republicans like Ted Cruz, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin and Rick Perry are on record calling for deferments and amnesties.
As always, IOKIYAR. (It's OK If You're A Republican)
“Fair use” should be reoriented toward its original meaning.
Agreed! Bring back fair use! People are still getting roped into paying for copying stuff for Educational Purposes... Education Purposes for goodness sake! Transformative is hardly supposed to be the *only* way something can be fair use! It is very clear from the text that being transformative was only supposed to be one of many super vague, highly subjective and most importantly un-restrictive ways something can be considered fair use.