In the interest of the citizens, the taxpayers, you need to reform how you do business.
It would be fare more efficient on taxpayer resources to issue one, and only one ruling that the government can get anything it wants, any time it wants, from anyone it wants, and for any reason whatsoever, real, imagined or spontaneously invented at the moment of need. Without any recourse, due process, or oversight. (Hint: take a lesson from Hollywood on this.)
Other tyrant fascist dictator police states have figured out this efficiency long ago. Why are you dragging your feet. Act like a FISA court ought to act. That's the entire reason the FISA court was established -- not that anyone would admit that.
The system can have TWO (or more) passwords. The real one and zero or more Fake passwords.
You use the real password in every day use.
You give the fascist tyrant police state dictators one of the fake ones. When the fake one is entered, all that you can see are a few apps, uninteresting contacts (grocer, dog groomer, hospital, etc) and uninteresting data.
Another fake password could be configured by the user so that upon first use, it destroys the real data and the real password.
If pressured you could give the fascist tyrant police state dictators more than one fake password.
If they got actual cybersecurity, then they would only be ripping it out again once Comey and others get their way of removing all encryption and cybersecurity from the US part of the internet.
Adding real cybersecurity to the DNC now might undermine both parties' objective of taking away everyone else's cybersecurity.
Maybe the price, maybe mostly already paid in loss of top people, is not so high as to warrant getting actual cybersecurity. Just look like you're outraged and trying to do something about it. Appoint a board full of know nothing politicians.