On the contrary, the rubes in suits had their own login to delete shit as they saw fit. So no, you are logic free on that bit.
I am curious what the state bar may think of this sort of bullshit.
I don't know man. My roomates 14 y/o was playing this last night and I caught a scene where the characters smokes pcp. I fully expect the boy to be on tour with Phish by tomorrow.
:)
The seem to solely exist for our amusement.
I concur. Techdirt had some teeth today.
Happy Thanksgiving folks!
Seriously Tim. After a full day of nothing but you my outlook on life is grim.
At least leave us with a turkey metaphor before you go lol..
I was particular amused with Ken's Post
"The complaint itself — which I have uploaded here — brings the crazy and brings it good and hard. It was penned by Roca Labs' latest attorney, one Johnny G. DeGirolamo, a 2009 law school graduate and 2011 bar admittee, whose website is www.inlawwetrust.com. No, really. His site offers a flattering headshot of a smiling advocate, and it was a very good choice to use that picture rather than, say, his booking photo."
http://openpasts.com/publicrecord/john-degirolamo/1598426033908
She is just pissed that chic is marginally more attractive lol..
And since when is an entirely over-sized ass a unique selling proposition. I think I missed that memo.
Geez you would think at this point they would understand that not being allowed to comment over there renders the place entirely useless.
Not that it isn't entirely useless in the first place.
"Continues to shift lawyers" was pretty gracious of you.
Its frankly just funny now. He is so entirely full of shit he is almost no longer a problem.
Fodder for the Daily Show is another animal.
that is all.
Or maybe dealing with you most closely resembles having to carry on a conversation with a scientologist.
"The other point, which is more debatable, is whether or not you believe that journalists are making it easier for people to engage in torture."
At first I thought that was a bit of stretch but 20 seconds later I arrived at "unfortunate side effect"
I would also posit that its largely a moot point. The position still assumes, in this case, that some transparency will somehow fix the issue. I seem to think otherwise. The US will still torture folks with impunity and not give a shit what people think.
I suspect my glass is half empty today lol..
Nigel
This should frankly be illegal. Its deceptive. Its a marketing practice.
N.
Shit. My shill radar just imploded.
"As for the notion that you're "paying twice", nothing could be further from the truth."
Not even going to go there.
N.
I have been lugging Thunderbird around for about 50 re installs. Its quite sound these days.
N.
I was largely being sarcastic but I appreciate the time you spent to properly iterate my point for me lol. I agree with you entirely.
I would posit, however, that this ploy of his still demonstrates a lack of understanding regarding some pretty simple shit :)
Re: Re: TIL
Indeed but where do you start? You would think big pharma would spiritually live at the top of that list but entertainment trade orgs are fighting the good fight to stay on top of my shit list.