I agree. Yes, there are problems with the EU mainly around centralisation, regulation and bureaucracy; but on the whole of it the UK has gained more from EU membership than it has lost.
As Loz Kaye and the UK Pirate Party say: don't shut down Europe, reboot it. You can't change it if you are not in it.
What annoys me most is when ill informed people refer to UKIP as libertarian. They are not libertarian nor anywhere near and this proves it. UKIP are full of batshit crazy members like this. One of the core tenets of libertarianism is a strong belief in freedom of speech which this UKIP member has tried to undermine.
I would like to bring to the attention of the class, the story of Zoe Keating.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/24/zoe-keating-itunes-spotify-youtube-payouts
Here is a musician who is using all of the technology available to her (as well as her considerable talent) to make a nice living from her music. Not only that but she is open about how much she makes from each service.
It is always good to hear from musicians who see online services as opportunities rather than hindrances.
A rather large American insurance company who has tech support based in the UK and who makes extensive use of VPNs will be fucked.
Internet filters
Gagging law
People being jailed for things they say on Twitter
Nothing but rhetoric and hyperbole being used to justify all this
I am truly ashamed to be from the UK
Demands for transparency is probably just a move to stop it from passing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-phone-record-collection-does-little-to-prevent-terrorist-attacks-group-says/2014/01/12/8aa860aa-77dd-11e3-8963-b4b654bcc9b2_story.html?hpid=z3
An analysis by New America Foundation into 225 terrorist cases since 9/11 determines that surveillance had no discernible impact on preventing terror attacks.
You need an NHS. Pity our government are intent on selling ours off bit by bit.
Obama is the perfect example of a style over substance President. He talks a big game but cannot or will not back it up with action. Even Obamacare, which is a step in the right direction (albeit a very small one) is a watered down version of what it could have been and what Americans need. His constant pandering to corporations is not what democracy is about.
Rep King seems like the ultimate troll.
A data retention law together with existing NSA surveillance could very well see the end of many American tech companies. At least companies were able to keep no logs and then, when the authorities request data, say "sorry we don't keep that data".
Bring in a data retention law and that stops and privacy/security minded people go offshore.
It sends exactly the right message to potential whistle blowers.
We need more whistle blowers to make the public aware of the crimes of governments and private companies. Whistle blowers should be given all the legal protection they deserve.
I still feel sorry for the guy as he has faced quite a lot of vitriol on social media for this. However, I don't blame Google, I blame the people too stupid to know the difference between him and the Lost Prophets singer.
The human race really is pathetic.
I was more talking about what is accomplished by parents choosing to use that category themselves. I can see it being used by religious types to force their bigotry and hatred onto their children.
The ISP's are only doing this in response to the government's "do it yourselves or we will legislate" campaign. They are doing it so they can go to government and show them evidence of what an expensive failure this blocking is.
On another related note, if you read the description of the BT parental control categories, this one is particularly worrying.
"Sex Education will block sites where the main purpose is to provide information on subjects such as respect for a partner, abortion, gay and lesbian lifestyle, contraceptives, sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy."
I fail to see what good would be served to block that kind of information.
That made me giggle
Would tax payers consent to paying for a course in what the Internet is and how it works for this guy?
This is what happens when you have people passing judgement on Internet related issues who have no understanding of how the Internet works.
This ruling sets a very dangerous precedent that has wide ranging implications for blogs, discussion forums, social media etc.