Most cashiers will happily use their code for your purchases. They get the 'points', you get the discount and the tracking company gets fairly confused.
Or just enter Jenny's phone number. (xxx)-867-5309 If it isn't registered in every area code already I'd be very surprised.
In my case, I had it tied to my phone number, then didn't use them for 3-4 years. Viola, my number has been reassigned to someone else so I just enter what used to be my phone number and give whoever has it the 'points'.
I'm assuming asking her husband "Honey, why did I get fined $800 dollars for our computer?"
wasn't an action she considered ? Seriously if I got fined 800 for something about my computer, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that if I make no changes or don't verify that changes were made to rectify the problem...it would likely happen again.
Yes she doesn't understand the technology, but clearly the husband did and she was fully able to ask him about the issue.
I've been amazed that Parallel Construction hasn't become a bigger issue. That there is *any* hint of extra-judicial shenanigans going on would seem, on it's face, to introduce 'reasonable doubt' to *any* court proceeding.
If it's happened once, it's happened every single time because it's impossible to prove it didn't happen.
How this isn't being handled as a 'the entire system is rigged' concept, even in the main stream press boggles my mind.
I'd happily appreciate someone explaining me off this cliff I seem to be on :)
And there are plenty of laws against video recording someone in private situations without their knowledge.
Unfortunately 'revenge' porn rarely is recording someone's sexual activities without their knowledge. The parties involved almost always know and agree to the creation of the video/pictures...at the time.
It's distributing that video later after the parties have split up that makes it revenge porn. It has nothing to do with the recording of the activities itself.
you're assuming people are only running red lights because of short yellow light times. I've got news for you, people are running them because they don't want to stop and wait 2 minutes, not because the lights are short. So increasing the yellow light times won't change that behavior.
reducing T-bone accidents IS an actual safety interest. Properly training people to react to the system would be the correct method for people slamming on their brakes.
if a 3rd party, such as you're friend or anyone/any company who doesn't have an agreement to 'not disclose', does indeed disclose, then yes you have no 4th amendment recourse.
The BIG difference here is the courts ordering the release of the 3rd party held information. That's not 'choosing' to disclose and as such you should be able to fully employ your 4th amendment rights.
Re: There is a distinction between the address an the content
I agree. Either the host is actively playing into his lack technical details, or the host is equally as stupid.
It's the difference between the address on a letter and the contents of the letter itself. (with the obvious exception that in a URL's case you can then go get the content if you wish)
Without the specific details of the program, it would likely be collecting the textual URL so they'd know which articles you visited on a site like TechDirt. For more dynamic/scripted sites it might be a bit harder to reconstruct the content that the subject actually saw from the URL and any other header data you might collect.