"suggesting that President Clinton committed a criminal act. It's a new low for you, which is incredible."
Suggesting President Clinton HASN'T committed a criminal act requires such an amazing level of hiding under a rock that I'm beginning to wonder if you people haven't discovered some form of dimension hopping. Take a look at the USA criminal code, then find me a person who has not broken some law.
I might just be giving them far too much credit, but I can personally see why they would not come out and say they flat out never would sue. That is basically just giving a blanket license to every patent they own to everyone in the world.
I do think they probably should have stepped up though and maybe said something along the lines of flat out they will never attack an open source group. That way they still can prevent someone, like say Apple, from just using tons of googles patients without licenses.
So... unless I am understanding this wrong. The only signature that matters on the transfer of the copyright is the one of the old owner. So, Didn't they basically just say that Allen Cooper just had ownership of a ton of porn just fall in his lap?
How about that for stolen identity. Find that no they didn't clean out your bank, in fact they gave you a lot of stuff.
"So you think the mere offer to take control over a piece of property is the same thing as having already taken control over it?"
Well, I think it is a bold faced lie to say you had no control over something after it has been offered to you. Basically following your logic, government can take something without warrant and then just play a massive shell game saying "Oh, we don't really have it, Fred down in storage does"
Trolls like that can be kind of annoying, but wow, how stupid do you have to be to go after a troll like that? Live tweeting your search for the troll seems like good way to hasten departure from this world.
Think of how it would go for the troll if he just sat and waited for this boxer to come pounding down the door. He could shoot the guy and easily claim self defense using the boxers own tweets as proof.
"Stating that it cannot be played offline because the simulations are too heavy for a PC is complete bullshit."
Well that should come across as obvious bull shit to anyone who knows about computers. Is EA really saying they are going to setup super computers to run their game for everyone? That is insane path to take. They have to then maintain lots of very powerful servers.
This game is doomed just because of the cost to EA of running all that. In a few years they will pull the plug on servers due to high cost of running them.
Yeah, sad thing is it seems like the US is trying to set a speed record on that cycle. We came from nothing to most powerful nation in the world in an amazingly short span of time and are spiraling down just as fast.
Is it just me that looks at this a realized that they have also doomed the game already? You see, what happens in a few years when they get tired of paying the cost of running these servers? EA turns off the servers and now the game is gone.
That alone is enough to stop me from buying. I have games from the 80s that I still play. In fact I think I have the original sim city somewhere and I can still play it if I feel like it. This new one? You can only play for as long as EA feels like letting you......
" I have yet to see anyone (other than our trolls and the usual maximalists in the industry) arguing that it's fair to extradite him"
What I find really sad is that from what I know of Kim Dotcom, I would bet he really has broken laws he should stand accountable for.
Having said that though, I do not think he should be extradited because the DOJ can't present a solid case and instead have botched up just about everything they could. They have used excessive force, tried to destroy evidence, and even tried preventing him from having legal counsel. So they managed to go after what should have been easy case, and managed to make Kim look like a saint next to how screwed up the DOJ is.