It's kind of funny how obvious your hand-waving is. I suppose the obviousness stems from either your inability to read the article and quoted sections or your inability to actually argue any specific points. Which is it? I'm curious.
more the fact that I'm not a trained lawyer and the simple fact that however its cut, if you post even 1 non infringing content on any site and the government takes that site down they have effectively silenced free speech (least according to me and my own completely untrained legal background)
though in this day and age, proving civil rights would be meaningless since the government would just label me a terrorist and lock me up for 100 years after I start complaining about them taking my rights away!
well whats the threshold for unprotected to protected speech? if as you put it that the courts will allow for some protected speech to be silenced when does it become a civil rights violation? I'd say if I put up a video denouncing the government for taking down website domains and then they take it down then, my own personal civil rights ALONG with the rights of the website owner have been violated since the government have by their own action PREVENTED ME from speeking
thank you for the many years that you have been a wonderful country. I'm gonna miss you and all the good times we spent. since you've left I've gotten terrified of your replacement. he grabs my privates in public places and sticks his tongue out whenever I complain. I'm gonna miss you USA. thanks for all the good times