Pissed Consumer is also asking courts to take a closer look at some suspicious libel lawsuits that have resulted in delisting of its content -- lawsuits that follow the same M.O. as the ones spotted by Levy.
So we may learn of more pissed off judges and other companies such as Profile Defenders.
Righthaven. Prenda. Profile Defenders. Popcorn is starting to get old. Pretzles in a bag are gratification without waiting for it to pop.
I'm sure Comey would assure us that the FBI would never use the data to undermine people's rights. The data would only be used for purely statistical purposes. In order to better understand what eyeballs to put warrants in front of. The FBI wants to protect everyone's first amendment right to agree with the FBI.
Suppose a police officer claims he / she was raped. The defendant could prove that it's not a rape because it only took 30 seconds instead of 10 minutes, because the defendant cannot hold it longer than 30 seconds. This argument is supported by the very words the police use in court. So it should be equally persuasive. A violation that takes a short time is not a violation.
Consider the people who think it is so horrible that Colin Kaepernick won't stand during the national anthem.
What form of protest would those people like? Would they like it better if he were out burning cars and breaking the windows of businesses as a form of protest?
In fact, what these people want is a form of protest that is totally invisible so that they don't have to be offended by it.
You can have free speech as long as it is impossible for anyone to hear it -- even if they want to. You can exercise your free speech in a location that is out of range of seeing and hearing to other people.
Isn't the purpose of a protest to be able to draw attention to some perceived injustice? Don't we all want to be made aware of injustice, before it happens to us?
First they came for the InstaFaceTwit users, but I was silent because I did not use InstaFaceTwit. Etc.
criminalizes illegal protests aimed at causing economic damage
You mean causing economic damage such as Trump publicly saying that the NY Times is failing. Saying this can have an effect on its stock price, whether true or not. But its worse when this is said just to punish a news organization, whatever you might think of them, for exercising their rights. Maybe Trump should have consequences for this type of behavior? But, then I suppose he could just pardon himself.
I didn't say it WAS a copyright infringement. It is a copyright issue. The kind of topic TD covers. And whether or not it is an infringement, it isn't any more or less so based on which candidate is doing it.
Point 5: you feel that 9.8 m/s^2 force holding you to the ground don't you? That's proof of the rocket's acceleration. If you're complaining about the infinite stack, I would point out that an infinite length can have one end to it. So there could be one tortoise that is the start of an infinite stack. According to Miksch's Law, if a string has one end, then it has another end. I conjecture that it's the number of tortoises in between the two ends that is infinite. QED. :-)
Point 6: what other source of power, according to YOUR theory could maintain the rocket's thrust for such a long time? Not puny chemical rockets. Not even nuclear (nook-you-lar) power.
It is important to have all of this well thought out. If you're not trying to make public policy, or sell something, then why would anyone need junk science?