Not if they colluded.
Koby, you seem hung up on the word "collusion" when the word "conspire" would do admirably; but then there needs to be a reason to conspire and at least two parties willing to do so.
They picked the fruit of the poisoned tree.
That legal metaphor applies to admission of evidence in court and relates to the 4th, not to news materials and the 1st.
"It's not that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, it's that the left hand doesn't know there are other hands."
--attributed to a great many people
Reminds me a bit of Jordache Enterprises Inc. v Hogg Wyld Ltd. (which made Lardashe designer jeans). It did not go well for the plaintiff.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-09-16-fi-5318-story.html
(more like mandarin-in-chief, not as big as a tangerine) Federal pardons won't help with the state bar and judiciary.
"Yes, sir. Please give me your contact information and I'll forward it to the Subpoena Compliance Officer. It may take a few days for them to respond since they haven't been hired yet."
If it was an HOA, they wouldn't have a prayer. Well, no. HOA's are not immune from the Constitution, no matter how much they may think they are. And including unconstitutional clauses in a contract does not make them enforceable.
If it was an HOA, they wouldn't have a prayer. Well, no. HOA's are not immune from the Constitution, no matter how much they may think they are. And including unconstitutional clauses in a contract does not make them enforceable.
Conservatives cry-
Less government regulation (unless we thought of it)!
Let people do whatever they want (unless we don't like it)!
SCOTUS is the biggest enemy of the BillofRights and still waffling even in this decision. A unanimous decision with multiple concurrences doesn't sound like much of a waffle, here. Please point us to the waffles (page/section would be handy).
Unfortunately, IIRC a SCOTUS decision a couple of years ago ("broken tail light") said they don't (currently) need to know the laws they say they're enforcing. That also needs to change.
contained only innocuous texts with defendant’s family and cat pictures
One DLL used to handle extracted video content hasn't been updated since 2012, ignoring more than 100 patches that have been made available since then.
Another article identifies that as ffmpeg, so it's really likely there's an LGPL/GPL violation there. Makes me wonder about how much other open-source code might be in there.
I wonder if Nunes can stomach the response, wouldn't be surprised if he tries to horn in on it.
Isn't Hansmeier still in bankruptcy (or has that been discharged)? If I'm not mistaken, court orders move to the head of the line for payment from the estate.
It would be sensible for google to provide a notification every hour that they're "changing the algorithms". Of course, what's announced today and what's implemented in four weeks may vary.
No, democrats hold 20th century traditional soviet values You have an extra comma in there.
I really wish people wouldn't use "disappear" as an active verb. That's like calling a question an "ask".
Which, of course, would run straight into Legend Brewing (although the latter being in Richmond Virginia, USA, they probably won't care).
Re: Crowd exceptionalism
Or shouting Theater at a crowded fire.