Until I heard Rachel Maddow's show on the NRA Obama's Kids ad (it was really about trolling), I had no context for comments like this. And they would piss me off. Which is exactly what Yee wants. And to rally like minded people to his cause or show someone that he stands for something.
Guess SCOTUS telling him to STFU isn't enough. Maybe holding lawmakers in contempt (e.g. tossing them into jail for a week, a month or maybe a year) might be a solution. It worked for the the terrorists at Gitmo, right?
I'm bordering on trolling here myself but I have a problem with lawmakers infringing on what I can do legally in my own home on my own time. Belmont when after smoking in condos and apartments (which I don't do but reserve the right for anyone to smoke in their own home).
Now he wants to come after video games? You'll have to pry the keyboard out of my cold dead fingers, Senator Yee.
While she may get away with her actions in this case, justifying and outright lying about them to the public. In private, her family and her conscience ultimately will judge her for what she did. If she has no conscience, then, as a true sociopath, she's perfectly positioned to become the next governor of Massachusetts. My only hope is that people of that state have a long memory for such things and her opponent will hammer home the "she drove a 24 boy to suicide" over and over and over.
While she may never see the consequences of her actions, time may judge her more harshly than if she was actually removed from office and stripped of her law license.
Sign the Whitehouse Petition to remove this prosecutor
BoingBoing has a link to a petition submitted to Whitehouse.gov to remove this prosecutor from her job. I think the more people that sign it, the more the Whitehouse will have to look at the problem.
If the petition process was enough to get Obama to say "We're not going to build a Death Star. Get over it." Maybe getting them to review this person's position in the Justice Department (a misnomer if ever I've heard one).
I'd like to see a group of 10 different ACLU attorneys, all of different ethnicities and ages, go walking in this area with remotely uploading video uplinks. When asked to show their papers by the various officers, they can go through the dialog "What's your probable cause." and refuse to produce them. Videos would then be used for litegation against the arresting officers, police chief, and mayor. That city is going to be bankrupt from all the litigation very quickly.
And by threatening MPs, the next step is for all the Board members of BPI can be pulled into local police stations and questioned about ALL their activities around this threatening behavior. Police interrogation and the information used to assemble a case against BPI for the UK equivalent of racketeering. Love to see these guys behind bars.
In the end, big companies make their own rules. If someone hiring does the wrong thing in California, there may be legal consequences for failing to hire because you declined to give access to your social media. But it requires the lawyers become involved.
While it's not required to get various forms of Trust and Durable Power of Attorney documents notarized, Wells Fargo requires all documents be notarized. Don't like it, bank somewhere else. Or sue.
A reporter for a local paper sat on the bleachers of the local high school and accessed an OPEN mount point on the schools file server via an open WiFi network. He didn't modify any files but he was able to open and read stuff that shouldn't have been publicly available. Then he wrote about it for the paper. The school district's IT department was in a dither about the lack of security but don't know if the City attorney tried to go after this guy. This was in Palo Alto, the heart of the Silicon Valley.
If open WiFi networks aren't wiretapping, then the DA had no case. But that didn't stop them from trying to make one.
Up until seeing this post, I hadn't considered using Kickstart or other crowdfunding to do something other than offer a way to see a project that might not otherwise happen. I've funded two things so far--a gay-themed superhero comic book (and seen the pages the author and artist has posted over the last months) and a coming-out film (it didn't make it's goal so the film didn't happen and my card wasn't charged $20). In both cases, I was funding something I wanted to see happen.
If it something to "invest" in, where I expect a monetary return for my money, that's another matter. I see crowd funding as a dicey proposition for that--rife with fraud and possible criminality as well as an opportunity to make money faster. It's not what I would do with my money in order to grow it.
I'd rather spend $$$ to keep the Castro Theater in SF showing the nightly eclectic Queer-friendly fare rather than it turn into another souless cineplex for the yuppies that are invading the neighborhood. They growl at the same sex couples holding hands and get all bent out of shape when those same couples tell them to 'F*ing breeders. This was _our_ neighborhood before you were even born. Take your 2-cup baby stroller and go live in the Marina."
The 2 guys in a garage who ported OpenOffice to MacOS have found that new users have become the bane of their existence. These people are upset that they have to pay $10/year for support of a 'free product'. It's gotten so bad that the developers have stopped fixing bugs because they're spending all their time answer tech support calls from users.
So, they shut down the payment system and let the current crop of people go without help. Only if you've bought support in the last year will they allow you to pay for another year for support and then answer your questions.
This seems just the reverse of what the original article is saying. But this is pissing off a LOT of people in the Macintosh news groups. You can't even post to the NeoOffice forums and emails from non-subscribers are bounced back. Their excuse is that they aren't a company and are doing this 'because they want to'. They took a free-software package (OpenOffice), forked it, changed the copyright to another form (it's legal), and now users are left twisting in the wind. The last time a developer did this (Brian Clark, 'author' of Thoth, a MacOS news reader), users either held their nose or told him to bite the big one.
Someone needs to drop a house on these guys who are doing this to NeoOffice.
I stumbled across Sam Tsui (recent Yale grad) who's a "Youtube phenomenon". He and his music producer led me to other Youtube artists who subscribe to. The video for this summer's hit CALL ME MAYBE was mentioned by one of the Glee actors. The ending became the plot for quite a few fanfic stories.
The idea that you need a recording contract to get your music out there is, I think, no longer true. Those struggling artists need $$$ to tour and actually give live concerts. Kickstarter, maybe? That's why I buy covers from them in iTunes--they get more $ from the sale than any commercial album.
Time for the record and movie industry to stop with their rectocranially impacted business model. They're selling buggy whips and don't even smell the gasoline.
An aunt was a 'lifetime' subscriber to the New Yorker until she died at 89. That subscription lasted 70+ years. Someone else down the block was a lifetime subscriber of The Reader's Digest (they were from the Midwest--not their fault) and had a similar run.
I'd love to see the early customers band together to launch a class action lawsuit against these clowns. No one really wins in those things except the lawyers, but if it makes the company keep their promises, great. Otherwise, they deserve to go out of business.
Why aren't Colbert and John Steward looking to move
If the distributor isn't doing their job by making their content available, why aren't Colbert and John Stewart's attorneys now screaming at Viacom to get their head outta their collective anni? If that's not part of their contracts, it sure ought to be. "Keep your corporate hands offa my show or you loose the right to distribute it. Where _I_ want it distributed."
I recently had a story on a fanfiction site taken down without explanation. I wrote a number of times asking why only to be ignored. Finally, I emailed a copy of the story and they objected to my use of the word "Bitch" in the title and the song lyrics I had in the story. I researched Fair Use and the advise from the US Copyright office said "when in doubt, get permission". If you can't, then don't use it. The use-case for Fair Use would require a judge and jury to decide, according to this site. This from
Once the internet uploading phone app appears, which would stream directly to the cloud, confiscating the phone will be the least of the police's problems. A court order to take down the video (as "evidence") would soon follow.
What I think is needed here is skilled observers. This would make a great 1st year associate's job. Go around filming police, staying out of their way, getting arrested, phone impounded, 'resisting arrest' and 'inciting' while being arrested to compound the arresting officer's offenses, and ultimately fighting the entire thing in court, filing damages against the city, police chief, and officers involved. Cities would settle. Marginal cops would be off the streets guarding the malls of America, and these law firms would make a ton of money.
When this all comes to trial if some DA decides to prosecute, I'm sure the ranger will be called to the stand to explain why she tazed the suspect. And to explain why, when asked, "Can I go now?" she said yes.
If the judge throws this out of court, I would not be surprised.
If the DA charges this guy and not accept a plea, I would not be surprised.
If this park ranger continues tasing people with impunity, I would not be surprised.
If the UK will extradite one of their citizens to the US for doing something that's legal in the UK but illegal in the US, then I see the reverse happening. Meeting the grounds for libel and defamation in the UK is a lot easier, so suing a US citizen in a UK court for such might be interesting. Same for other crimes.
A disaster that caused a gas pipeline to explode killing 8 people in SF has been found to be caused by various illegal and the company diverted funds collected from rate payers to pay themselves. Suppose some QC in the UK decides to prosecute the CEO and Board of the gas company various criminal charges because a UK citizen died in the explosion. Doubt the US courts would extradite these 1%-ers to the UK for trial. So Interpol sends some people to 'extradite them' with extreme prejudice. I can see this as a LAW & ORDER-UK episode in the near future.
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
I did a little victory dance when an owner of a property that illegally went into foreclosure sued the bank that did the robosigning. He won a judgement against them and made every attempt to contact them for funds. So he showed up at their offices with a moving van, court order, and sheriff's deputies. It took the bank president 5 minutes to make out a cashier's check for the amount of the settlement plus the cost of the van, court costs and the sheriff's time. It made the papers and was on the AP.
I'd love to see this happen with Righthaven's CEO. The asset of Righthaven hauled away in a van along with their cars and the contents of their house.
If the DA files on this case, I'd go after them for prosecutorial misconduct. I hope the family court judge sanctions them. And the kid's mom should contact the ACLU. I wonder what strategy they'd use to go after the school district and specifically this clueless administrator.