the saddest part of this civil asset forfeiture system is the fact there needs to be a law telling the cops this. it should have been explicitly known you had to be convicted before the property could be seized, but then again lawyers are involved.
this man's behavior isn't any different than a lot of peoples behavior today. he has the "all about me syndrome", a disease caused by the fact that your mommy and daddy filled you with the belief that your special and deserve things.
when you institutionalize the corruption so far as to allow the officials to declare them on their taxes. the line between public servant and serial criminal blur so far as to become as meaningless.
i think this will kill google's want to be on the good side of the MPAA. this is what finally shows google it's time to go to war. and luckily google has more money
you want to fix the problem? you make them all charge the same prices. one hospital might charge 500 dollars for an x-ray and another 1500. the first step is forcing mandatory prices they can't charge more than.
his parents need to sue the heck out of the school for suppressing his religion. now i know the kid probably isn't a "literal" satanist but the school can't prove that and i'm tired of some middle management idiot doing shit like this.
some of what he says is hyperbole the same why i say i'm the only sane man in family. is my family insane? no they are just selfish narcissist's constantly engaging in foolishness.
but some of his claims are in fact troubling showing he may be at least mentally unstable and paranoid. we can only hope this turns out for the best of the citizens and not the law enforcement agencies
the ncaa is going to be screwed. this is a first amendment case, the ncaa's case boils a contract matter. free speech has historically been chained under contracts. that's why celebs with huge endorsement deals have morality clauses and the courts have ruled them legal. and the courts have also penalized people for acting in bad faith or illegal business behaviors in employment contracts.
the question is that he's been using the logo for ten years and disney has never once attempted to sue or claim he's infringing their IP. i think that might be a huge question come to trial, if everyone chips in on his legal fees do you think we could have the court decide that disney loses their trademarks involved in this because they didn't protect them.
well, well Mr. Recording Industry Exec "It's Not Censorship To Block Sits You Don't Like, that's like saying, if someone steals every penny you have then it's not theft because your rich.
the court is just going to have to admit that they can not remove any request involving the erasing of criminal or civil charges. honestly the court should have known the sheer amount of criminals who would try to use this to wipe their crimes from the internet.
does this mean the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can't be a charity because it uses proprietary software from Microsoft which is a for profit entity? do all charity's get exempted from not profit status if a for profit entity uses the charity's name or logo on promotional materials to drum up business by pointing out how much of a "philanthropist" the corporation is.
why is the old guard so deadset, knowing they have maybe ten years left before the entire old guard is ushered out for the generations after 1980 have to do everything they can to screw up the government bureaucracy just like they did with the economy/jobs/environment/law/copyright system/ insert anything you can think of/
wikipedia should just make it so that in the TOS for signing up you have to disclose your job in PR and then if you don't they have the legal right to make you pay them 500,000 dollars and you agree to binding arbitration and give up all rights to seek redress in a jurisdiction that you live in.
the police more than likely had the permission of the homeowner who paid for the wifi. a criminal should never be allowed to claim evidence was improperly collected from OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY. if someone breaks into my home and the police investigates finding fingerprints which eventually find the thief. the thief has no right to contest the arrest on the grounds that taking his fingerprints from my home violated his rights.
the criminal should have never had a leg to stand on simply because the wifi was not his and therefore he didn't have the legal right to deny the police to run the "moocherhunter" software. if you access other peoples wifi or home without permission and leave behind evidence they can use against you then expect that it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.
On the post: New Mexico Passes Law Saying Law Enforcement Can't Steal Your Property Without A Criminal Conviction
On the post: FCC Moves To Give Internet Video Startups The Same Protections As Cable Companies
On the post: Deposed Revenge Porn Jester Craig Brittain Tries To DMCA Censor Popehat, Adam Steinbaugh... And The FTC
On the post: Lawmaker Who Said Snowden Committed Treason, Now On The Other Side Of Metadata Surveillance
"karma's a witch, who turns against her friends faster than her enemies."
On the post: How Seizing Assets Leads To More Surveillance... And Then More Seized Assets... And Then More Surveillance... And Then...
On the post: Film Academy Sues Family Of Oscar Winner For Selling Trophy On Ebay
On the post: Leaked Emails Reveal MPAA Plans To Pay Elected Officials To Attack Google
On the post: DailyDirt: Healthcare Nightmares
On the post: Student Facing Terroristic Threat Charges After Decorating High School Bathroom With Laughable 'Satanic' Graffiti
On the post: Here's Hoping Judge Ignores The Nutty Plaintiff With An Important Case On NSA Surveillance Of Business Records
but some of his claims are in fact troubling showing he may be at least mentally unstable and paranoid. we can only hope this turns out for the best of the citizens and not the law enforcement agencies
On the post: FCC Considering Extending Cable Rules To Internet Players Like Aereo (Though Probably Too Late For Aereo)
On the post: Court Ruling: The NFL Isn't Violating Player's Publicity Rights By Selling Videos Of Historical Game Footage
On the post: Aussie Teenager Fearful For His Life After Newspaper Misidentifies Him As A Terrorist With Wrong Facebook Photo
Re:
On the post: Disney Officially Seeks To Block Deadmau5's Trademark Claim
On the post: How AT&T's Own Legal Fights Show It's Lying In Claiming Broadband Reclassification Would Create Collateral Damage
On the post: Recording Industry Exec Says It's Not Censorship To Block Sites He Doesn't Like
On the post: Another Right To Be Forgotten Request Backfires Completely
On the post: IRS Rejects Non-Profit Status For Open Source Organization, Because Private Companies Might Use The Software
why is the old guard so deadset, knowing they have maybe ten years left before the entire old guard is ushered out for the generations after 1980 have to do everything they can to screw up the government bureaucracy just like they did with the economy/jobs/environment/law/copyright system/ insert anything you can think of/
On the post: Group Of Major PR Firms Pledge To Play Nice On Wikipedia
teach them to screw around with the site.
On the post: Appeals Court Says Using Open WiFi May Be A Crime
the police more than likely had the permission of the homeowner who paid for the wifi. a criminal should never be allowed to claim evidence was improperly collected from OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY. if someone breaks into my home and the police investigates finding fingerprints which eventually find the thief. the thief has no right to contest the arrest on the grounds that taking his fingerprints from my home violated his rights.
the criminal should have never had a leg to stand on simply because the wifi was not his and therefore he didn't have the legal right to deny the police to run the "moocherhunter" software. if you access other peoples wifi or home without permission and leave behind evidence they can use against you then expect that it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.
Next >>