Yet another topic I wish I could peruse ... have you considered a textual version of these so that those of us that are deaf can participate?
"Most technology experts agree that Defendants could and should be doing more to stop ISIS from using its social network."
Really? Give real, workable examples of HOW to do this, please?
That is not a false impersonation.
What, exactly, is "falsely impersonating"?
If "impersonate" is to "pretend to be (another person)", wouldn't "falsely impersonating" mean that you're pretending to be yourself? or, maybe, NOT impersonating someone else?
Now, if that had read "falsly personating", it would be a different matter.
"Of course, that is an average across all of Google's search results"
Does that mean that this value includes searches that have nothing to do with news?
(If it wasn't obvious in my screed above....)
Those that complain that the price of cable tv is too high and/or the bundling is awful (both of which I agree with) and/or that to get the same content from streaming services is also expensive .... maybe you need to sit down with your family and really figure out how YOU "value" that content.
If the cost is less than, or equal to, your value assessment, why are you complaining? If it's not ... why are you subscribing?
I "cut the cord" many years ago.
I had Netflix for nearly two years (Canadian flavor), until I ran out of shows that were remotely interesting (that happened a few years ago as well), at which time I canceled that too.
I don't download content (legal or illegal).
Our cable company calls up about once a month to tell me what a great value their "introductory offer" of 200 channels for $50 is ($75 after the hidden charges are added in); it's difficult to get them to tell you what the price is when the introductory offer ends, but, frankly, it doesn't really matter anyway.
What they don't seem to understand is that, from the "consumers" end, THEY don't set the "value". We, the consumers, do.
How many hours of labour (used to earn the money you have to pay) are you willing to trade for a bit of entertainment? THAT is YOUR real "value". And for me, the answer is (for what is offered) maybe up to $15 (INCLUDING the hidden crap). I just don't value their service much.
Yes, it can cost them quite a lot to produce those shows; but you know what? that's NOT MY PROBLEM. It's theirs! If they can't (or won't) price it in a range that meets MY values, they simply don't get a sale at all.
I have a lot of DVDs and even a lot of old VHS tapes (of shows you can't even get on DVDs) if I want to watch something. I also have lots and lots of books. I have my photography to pursue, and I write software in my spare time. I don't NEED TV service at all. Quite honestly, I don't even miss it - I have enough other things to occupy my time (like reading TechDirt comments).
In order to not look incompetent, they need to find a scapegoat. Reality need not enter the equation - they simply need someone to pile charges on so that it LOOKS like they can actually do their jobs.
They can seize the vehicle, sell it at auction and (after collecting the payment), seize it AGAIN! They could sell the same vehicles dozens of times.
and here I thought I finally had a good, socially acceptable excuse to get rid of that annoying voicemail! That would just leave me looking for a good reason to get rid of that almost-as-annoying "call waiting" that I never asked for and don't want.
The game, at least, is (or, more correctly, WAS) certainly "trigger happy"
They're getting so good at this cracking DRM ... I'm waiting for the day that the crack is released BEFORE the game is.
I think that the real purpose here is to condition children to accept "on the spot" searches that are actually illegal ... then, when they are adults, they won't question the authority of LEO's to continue to search at will without warrants or probable cause. Same with excessive surveillance in schools; get 'em used to it young and they won't question it as adults.
Pretty much what I came here to say.... maybe next time I can beat you to it?
If 18 million people are misidentified and (presuming) the correct person is identified as well, that's an accuracy rate of 0.00000000055%
Welcome to "Big Data". (SEE False positive paradox)
So, really, this tells innovators to not bother .. because someone ELSE is just going to come along with a patent (probably old, unheard-of and vague) and take it all away from you.
I "cut the cord" for cable TV 4-5 years ago. Last summer, the cable company here talked me into a trial where I basically got TV service for free - and in 6 months, I actually turned it on 3 times. Twice for less than 15 minutes each (after which the commercials drove me to turn it back off) and once for half an hour.
Fact is, not only do I not miss it, I generally don't even think about it. I have other things to do with my time.
I did have Netflix for a couple years, but the Canadian catalog is so limited that I let that go too.
A point that seems to often be missed is you don't HAVE to have TV service (or equivalent) at all.
Another point that is usually missed is that the online subscriptions like Netflix DON'T HAVE COMMERCIALS (that said, there HAVE been commercials that I really liked, such as the old "Mac vs PC" series), can be watched when I want, where I want and on the devices I choose. So, even if the total cost was the same, it's still an improvement (RtB).
As for the cost of internet ... I was paying for that all along anyway, so it's not "fair" to "add" that cost in again.
This has got to be the most honest response from an Alphabet agency I've ever seen:
"We aren't going to answer ... because we don't want to and there is nothing you can do about it"
Re:
Exactly. I do mostly CADD work for my job, but each of the projects has to be verified on-site - so I "print" to pdf, put that one a tablet (that has a stylus), go on-site to make notes, then come back to my PC to update everything. They are simply for different kinds of tasks.